Preliminary safety assessment of C–8 xylitol monoester and xylitol phosphate esters

International Journal of Cosmetic Science - Tập 38 Số 1 - Trang 41-51 - 2016
Jefferson E. Silveira1, Maria Claudia Pereda2, Cecília Nogueira2, Gustavo de Campos Dieamant1, Camila Kappke Cesar2, K. M. Assanome3, M. S. Silva1, Cristiane Okuda Torello1, Mary L.S. Queiroz1, Samara Eberlin1
1Department of Pharmacology/Hemocenter, Faculty of Medical Science, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Campinas, SP, Brazil.
2Research and Development Department Chemyunion Química Ltda Sorocaba SP Brazil
3State University of Campinas (Unicamp) Department of Pharmacology/ Hemocenter, Faculty of Medical Science Campinas SP Brazil

Tóm tắt

SynopsisObjectivesMost of the cosmetic compounds with preservative properties available in the market pose some risks concerning safety, such as the possibility of causing sensitization. Due to the fact that there are few options, the proper development of new molecules with this purpose is needed. Xylitol is a natural sugar, and the antimicrobial properties of xylitol‐derived compounds have already been described in the literature. C‐8 xylitol monoester and xylitol phosphate esters may be useful for the development of skincare products. As an initial screen for safety of chemicals, the combination of in silico methods and in vitro testing can aid in prioritizing resources in toxicological investigations while reducing the ethical and monetary costs that are related to animal and human testing. This study was designed to evaluate the safety of C‐8 xylitol monoester and xylitol phosphate esters regarding carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, skin and eye irritation/corrosion and sensitization through alternative methods.MethodsFor the initial safety assessment, quantitative structure‐activity relationship methodology was used. The prediction of the parameters carcinogenicity/mutagenicity, skin and eye irritation/corrosion and sensitization was generated from the chemical structure. The analysis also comprised physical–chemical properties, Cramer rules, threshold of toxicological concern and Michael reaction. In silico results of candidate molecules were compared to 19 compounds with preservative properties that are available in the market. Additionally, in vitro tests (Ames test for mutagenicity, cytotoxicity and phototoxicity tests and hen's egg test – chorioallantoic membrane for irritation) were performed to complement the evaluation.ResultsIn silico evaluation of both molecules presented no structural alerts related to eye and skin irritation, corrosion and sensitization, but some alerts for micronucleus and carcinogenicity were detected. However, by comparison, C‐8 xylitol monoester, xylitol phosphate esters showed similar or better results than the compounds available in the market. Concerning experimental data, phototoxicity and mutagenicity results were negative. As expected for compounds with preservative activity, xylitol‐derived substances presented positive result in cytotoxicity test. In hen's egg test, both molecules were irritants.ConclusionOur results suggested that xylitol‐derived compounds appear to be suitable candidates for preservative systems in cosmetics.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1467-2494.1997.tb00192.x

10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01952.x

10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01501.x

10.4315/0362-028X-63.8.1113

10.1177/0192623312466459

10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.03.011

10.1016/j.nano.2009.12.002

10.1046/j.1467-2494.2002.00139.x

10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02319.x

10.1007/s00284-009-9531-7

10.1111/j.1468-2494.2009.00492.x

10.1128/AEM.53.3.505-508.1987

10.1128/AAC.45.1.166-169.2001

10.1093/jac/41.5.563

10.1128/AAC.39.8.1820

10.1159/000261011

10.1159/000260829

Ferreira A.S., 2009, In vivo xylitol primary dermal irritation and phototoxicity evaluation, Lat. Am. J. Pharm., 28, 192

10.1111/j.1468-2494.2010.00633.x

Papageorgiou S., 2010, New alternatives to cosmetics preservation, J. Cosmet. Sci., 61, 107

10.1093/toxsci/kfs095

OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4: Health Effects Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test 471 (1997).

Umbuzeiro G.A. Vargas V.M.F. Felzenszawalb I. Henriques J.A.P.andVaranda E.Orientações básicas de execução de Testes de Mutagenicidade para proteção da saúde humana e do meio ambiente. Teste de mutação reversa com Salmonella typhimurium. SBMCTA Série Documentos N.1 (2004).

ECVAM DB‐ALM: MTT assay. Protocol 17. 1‐5 (1990).

OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Draft Proposal for a New Guideline.In Vitro3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test. 432 (2002).

Holzhütter H.G., 1997, A general measure of in vitro phototoxicity derived from pairs of dose‐response curves and its use for predicting the in vivo phototoxicity of chemicals, ATLA, 25, 445

Liebsch M.andSpielmann H.INVITTOX Protocol 78: 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Assay. ECVAM DB‐ALM. (1998)

10.1016/0278-6915(85)90030-4

10.1016/0165-1218(87)90014-0

10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.06.001

Goossens A., 2011, Contact‐allergic reactions to cosmetics, J. Allergy (Cairo), 2011, 467071

10.1093/toxsci/48.2.218

Vogel R., 2009, Alternatives to the use of animals in safety testing as required by the EU‐Cosmetics Directive 2009, ALTEX, 26, 223, 10.14573/altex.2009.3.223

10.1038/460208a

10.2174/138620710790596736

10.1111/j.1346-8138.2012.01551.x

10.1016/j.tiv.2011.04.026

10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01001.x

10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01640.x

10.1016/j.taap.2009.12.007