Predicting the reliability of an additively-manufactured metal part for the third Sandia fracture challenge by accounting for random material defects
Tóm tắt
We describe an approach to predict failure in a complex, additively-manufactured stainless steel part as defined by the third Sandia Fracture Challenge. A viscoplastic internal state variable constitutive model was calibrated to fit experimental tension curves in order to capture plasticity, necking, and damage evolution leading to failure. Defects such as gas porosity and lack of fusion voids were represented by overlaying a synthetic porosity distribution onto the finite element mesh and computing the elementwise ratio between pore volume and element volume to initialize the damage internal state variables. These void volume fraction values were then used in a damage formulation accounting for growth of these existing voids, while new voids were allowed to nucleate based on a nucleation rule. Blind predictions of failure are compared to experimental results. The comparisons indicate that crack initiation and propagation were correctly predicted, and that an initial porosity field superimposed as higher initial damage may provide a path forward for capturing material strength uncertainty. The latter conclusion was supported by predicted crack face tortuosity beyond the usual mesh sensitivity and variability in predicted strain to failure; however, it bears further inquiry and a more conclusive result is pending compressive testing of challenge-built coupons to de-convolute materials behavior from the geometric influence of significant porosity.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bammann DJ, Aifantis EC (1987) A model for finite-deformation plasticity. Acta Mech 69(1–4):97–117
Bammann DJ, Chiesa ML, Johnson GC (1995) A state variable model for temperature and strain rate dependent metals. In: Constitutive laws: theory, experiments and numerical implementation, Barcelona, pp 84–97
Boyce BL et al (2014) The sandia fracture challenge: blind round robin predictions of ductile tearing. Int J Fract 186(1–2):5–68
Boyce BL et al (2016) The second sandia fracture challenge: predictions of ductile failure under quasi-static and moderate-rate dynamic loading. Int J Fract 198(1–2):5–100
Brown AA, Bammann DJ (2012) Validation of a model for static and dynamic recrystallization in metals. Int J Plast 32–33:17–35
Cocks ACF, Ashby MF (1980) Intergranular fracture during power-law creep under multiaxial stresses. Met Sci 14(8–9):395–402
Cubit Development Team (2017) Cubit Geometry and Mesh Generation Toolkit 15.3 User Documentation
Emery JM, Field RV, Foulk JW, Karlson KN, Grigoriu MD (2015) Predicting laser weld reliability with stochastic reduced-order models: predicting laser weld reliability. Int J Numer Methods Eng 103(12):914–936
Frazier WE (2014) Metal additive manufacturing: a review. J Mater Eng Perform 23(6):1917–1928
Grigoriu M (2002) Stochastic calculus: applications in science and engineering. Birkhäuser, Boston
Horstemeyer MF, Gokhale AM (1999) A void-crack nucleation model for ductile metals. Int J Solids Struct 36(33):5029–5055
Johnson NL, Kotz S, Balakrishnan N (1995) Continuous univariate distributions 2 2. Wiley, New York
Johnson KL et al (2018) Simulation and experimental comparison of the thermo-mechanical history and 3D microstructure evolution of 304L stainless steel tubes manufactured using LENS. Comput Mech 61(5):559–574
Karlson KN, Foulk JW, Brown AA, Veilleux MG (2016) Sandia fracture challenge 2: Sandia California’s modeling approach. Int J Fract 198(1–2):179–195
Kramer SLB et al (2019) The third sandia fracture challenge: predictions of ductile fracture in additively manufactured metal. Int J Fract. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-019-00361-1
Madison JD et al (2018) Corroborating tomographic defect metrics with mechanical response in an additively manufactured precipitation-hardened stainless steel. Presented at the 44th Annual Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, p 020009
Needleman A, Tvergaard V (1994) Mesh effects in the analysis of dynamic ductile crack growth. Eng Fract Mech 47(1):75–91
Noell PJ, Carroll JD, Boyce BL (2018) The mechanisms of ductile rupture. Acta Mater 161:83–98
Parimi LL, Ravi GA, Clark D, Attallah MM (2014) Microstructural and texture development in direct laser fabricated IN718. Mater Charact 89:102–111
Rodgers TM, Bishop JE, Madison JD (2018) Direct numerical simulation of mechanical response in synthetic additively manufactured microstructures. Model Simul Mater Sci Eng 26(5):055010
SIERRA Solid Mechanics Team, Sierra/SolidMechanics 4.50 User Guide, SAND2018-10673. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque
Sterling AJ, Torries B, Shamsaei N, Thompson SM, Seely DW (2016) Fatigue behavior and failure mechanisms of direct laser deposited Ti-6Al-4 V. Mater Sci Eng A 655:100–112