Practice guidelines and clinical governance: do the means match with the ends? A quality appraisal of local practice guidelines

Emerald - Tập 8 Số 4 - Trang 312-317 - 2003
ElenaBerti1, RobertoGrilli2
1Elena Berti is Head of Department of Clinical Governance at Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale, Bologna, Italy.
2Roberto Grilli is Medical Doctor‐Junior Researcher, both at Agenzia Sanitaria Regionale, Bologna, Italy.

Tóm tắt

The quality of 39 guidelines developed locally was assessed, using a standardised instrument addressing five quality domains (scope and purpose, stakeholders involvement, rigour of development, applicability and clarity). For each of them a domain‐specific quality score (ranging from 0 to 100) was estimated. Overall, local guidelines scored particularly low on rigour (mean: 5.1; sd: 12.1) and applicability (mean: 16.9; sd: 12.9). Scores for other domains were only slightly better. This study suggests that local guidelines do not assure neither scientific validity of the recommendations nor attention to their adoption in clinical practice. Without substantial changes in their local use, practice guidelines will not be of any benefit in supporting the implementation of clinical governance.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

(The) AGREE Collaboration (2003), “Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project”, Quality and Safety in Health Care, Vol. 12, February, pp. 18‐23.

AGREE Collaborative Group (2001), “Guideline development in Europe”, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 16, pp. 1039‐49.

Choudhry, N.K., Stelfox, H.T. and Detsky, A.S. (2002), “Relationships between authors of clinical practice guidelines and the pharmaceutical industry”, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol 287 No. 5, pp. 612‐17.

Graham, I.D., Beardall, S., Carter, A.O., Glennie, J., Hebert, P.C., Tetroe, J.M., McAlister, F.A., Visentin, S. and Anderson, G.M. (2001), “What is the quality of drug therapy clinical practice guidelines in Canada?”, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Vol. 165 No. 2, pp. 157‐63.

Grilli, R., Magrini, N., Penna, A., Mura, G. and Liberati, A. (2000), “Practice guidelines developed by specialty societies: the need for a critical appraisal”, Lancet, Vol. 355 No. 9198, pp. 103‐6.

Grimshaw, J. and Russell, I. (1993), “Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines. I: developing scientifically valid guidelines”, Quality in Health Care, Vol. 2 No. 4, pp. 243‐8.

Miller, J. and Petrie, J. (2001), “Development of practice guidelines”, Lancet, Vol. 355 No. 9198, pp. 82‐3.

Secretary of State for Health (1998), A First‐Class Service, Department of Health, London.

Shaneyfelt, T.M., Mayo‐Smith, M.F. and Rothwangl, J. (1999), “Are guidelines following guidelines? The methodological quality of clinical practice guidelines in the peer‐reviewed medical literature”, Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 281 No. 20, pp. 1900‐5.