Practical ethics for building learning analytics

British Journal of Educational Technology - Tập 50 Số 6 - Trang 2855-2870 - 2019
Kirsty Kitto, Simon Knight

Tóm tắt

AbstractArtificial intelligence and data analysis (AIDA) are increasingly entering the field of education. Within this context, the subfield of learning analytics (LA) has, since its inception, had a strong emphasis upon ethics, with numerous checklists and frameworks proposed to ensure that student privacy is respected and potential harms avoided. Here, we draw attention to some of the assumptions that underlie previous work in ethics for LA, which we frame as three tensions. These assumptions have the potential of leading to both the overcautious underuse of AIDA as administrators seek to avoid risk, or the unbridled misuse of AIDA as practitioners fail to adhere to frameworks that provide them with little guidance upon the problems that they face in building LA for institutional adoption. We use three edge cases to draw attention to these tensions, highlighting places where existing ethical frameworks fail to inform those building LA solutions. We propose a pilot open database that lists edge cases faced by LA system builders as a method for guiding ethicists working in the field towards places where support is needed to inform their practice. This would provide a middle space where technical builders of systems could more deeply interface with those concerned with policy, law and ethics and so work towards building LA that encourages human flourishing across a lifetime of learning. Practitioner NotesWhat is already known about this topic Applied ethics has a number of well‐established theoretical groundings that we can use to frame the actions of ethical agents, including, deontology, consequentialism and virtue ethics. Learning analytics has developed a number of checklists, frameworks and evaluation methodologies for supporting trusted and ethical development, but these are often not adhered to by practitioners. Laws like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) apply to fields like education, but the complexity of this field can make them difficult to apply. What this paper adds Evidence of tensions and gaps in existing ethical frameworks and checklists to support the ethical development and implementation of learning analytics. A set of three edge cases that demonstrate places where existing work on the ethics of AI in education has failed to provide guidance. A “practical ethics” conceptualisation that draws on virtue ethics to support practitioners in building learning analytics systems. Implications for practice and/or policy Those using AIDA in education should collect and share example edge cases to support development of practical ethics in the field. A multiplicity of ethical approaches are likely to be useful in understanding how to develop and implement learning analytics ethically in practical contexts.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alexander L., 2016, The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy

10.1145/129875.129885

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199604074.001.0001

Broad E., 2018, Made by humans: The AI Condition, 10.2307/jj.5371952

Caulfield M., 2016, We have personalization backwards

10.1016/j.clsr.2017.10.003

10.1145/2883851.2883893

Feldstein M., 2016, Personalized learning: What it really is and why it really matters, EDUCAUSE Review, 51, 24

Ferguson R., 2016, Learning analytics: Visions of the future

10.1145/3027385.3027396

10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5

10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.10.002

10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x

10.1145/3027385.3027436

10.1186/s12910-015-0072-2

10.1007/978-3-319-61043-6_12

10.1111/bjet.12862

10.1109/TLT.2009.9

Kay J., From data to personal user models for life‐long, life‐wide learners, British Journal of Educational Technology

10.1145/3170358.3170413

10.1145/2723576.2723627

10.4337/9781788972611.00023

10.14742/ajet.3607

10.1080/02602938.2018.1506909

Knight S., 2018, 13th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age. Making the Learning Sciences Count, 1783

10.1002/9781118721254

10.1145/3236024.3264833

10.18608/jla.2018.53.15

10.1111/bjet.12152

10.4159/harvard.9780674736061

10.1145/3027385.3027406

10.1007/s10758-017-9316-1

Scheffel M., 2017, The evaluation framework for learning analytics

Sellar S., 2017, The global education race: Taking the measure of PISA and international testing

Shibani A., 2017, 25th International Conference on Computers in Education, 306

10.1177/0002764213479366

10.1111/bjet.12846

van der Sloot B., 2014, Privacy as human flourishing: Could a shift towards virtue ethics strengthen privacy protection in the age of Big Data?, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 5, 230

10.1111/bjet.12849

World Economic Forum, 2016, The future of jobs: Employment, skills and workforce strategy for the fourth industrial revolution

Zuboff S., 2019, The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for the future at the new frontier of power

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

British Journal of Educational Technology

Tập 50 Số 6

2855-2870

Thông tin tác giả