Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory

Administrative Science Quarterly - Tập 50 Số 2 - Trang 167-199 - 2005
Tiziana Casciaro1, Mikołaj Jan Piskorski1
1Harvard University

Tóm tắt

Despite ubiquitous references to Pfeffer and Salancik's classic volume, The External Control of Organizations, resource dependence theory is more of an appealing metaphor than a foundation for testable empirical research. We argue that several ambiguities in the resource dependence model account in part for this and propose a reformulation of resource dependence theory that addresses these ambiguities, yields novel predictions and findings, and reconciles them with seemingly contradictory empirical evidence from past studies. We identify two distinct theoretical dimensions of resource dependence, power imbalance and mutual dependence, which in the original theory were combined in the construct of interdependence and yet have opposite effects on an organization's ability to reduce dependencies by absorbing sources of external constraint. Results from a study of interindustry mergers and acquisitions among U.S. public companies in the period 1985–2000 indicate that, while mutual dependence is a key driver of mergers and acquisitions, power imbalance acts as an obstacle to their formation. We conclude that our reformulation of the resource dependence model contributes to realizing the potential of resource dependency as a powerful explanation of interorganizational action.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/001979398103400204

Blau P. M., 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life

10.1086/227093

10.1016/B978-0-12-147150-7.50014-4

Burt R. S., 1983, Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy

Cohen J., 1983, Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2

10.1525/9780520311619

10.2307/2089716

10.1037/0022-3514.47.4.709

10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199711)18:10<787::AID-SMJ913>3.0.CO;2-R

10.1080/0022250X.1986.9990008

10.2307/256042

10.2307/2393252

10.1108/eb022802

10.1086/228311

10.2307/2393756

10.2307/2667030

Hardin J. W., 2003, Generalized Estimating Equations

10.2307/2393337

10.2307/2393810

Hegtvedt K. A., 1987, Advances in Group Processes, 4, 109

10.2307/2391787

Jensen M., 1987, The Merger Boom, 102

10.1177/01461672972310007

10.1016/0378-8733(88)90004-4

10.1093/sf/66.2.446

10.2307/2096408

10.2307/2390622

10.1086/227729

10.1086/229274

10.2307/2096288

Perrow C., 1970, Organizational Analysis: A Sociological View

10.2307/2393956

Pfeffer J., 1987, Intercorporate Relations: The Structural Analysis of Business, 25

10.1093/sf/55.3.775

10.2307/2391851

Pfeffer J., 1978, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective

Pfeffer J., 2003, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, 2

Piskorski M. J., 2004, “Power, brokerage and status: Creation of structural inequality in exchange networks”

Piskorski M. J., 2004, “When more power makes actors worse off: Turning a profit in the American economy”

10.2307/2392452

Selznick P., 1949, TVA and the Grass Roots

Simpson W., 2002, “Quadratic assignment procedure in Stata”

Thompson J. D., 1967, Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administration

10.2307/2096399

10.2307/2393808

10.2307/2094477

Williamson O. E., 1975, Markets and Hierarchies

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Administrative Science Quarterly

Tập 50 Số 2

167-199

Thông tin tác giả