Postdigital Learning for a Changing Higher Education
Tóm tắt
This article draws upon the authors’ previous work on the opportunities and challenges learners face as they move into, through, and out of transitional learning spaces. The authors argue that equipping students to locate themselves with/in the tensions of learning is imperative, especially in postdigital learning environments. Teaching in ways that enable students to acknowledge their ‘will to learn’ and to understand that liminal learning can prompt distress and disjunction or the ability to think differently is discussed. This article begins by examining the relationship between the postdigital and the liminal, offers an Integrated Model of Transitional Learning Spaces, and presents different types of disjunctions. It then explores how learners navigate the liminal and concludes by arguing for a need to focus on postdigital learning and liminal learning in a changing higher education landscape.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469.
Ball, J. P. (2022). Stop, Ask, Explore: Learn to Navigate Change in Times of Uncertainty. London: Kogan Page.
Barnett, R. (2014). Conditions of flexibility. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/conditions-flexibility-securing-more-responsive-higher-education-system. Accessed 28 April 2022.
Barnett, R. (2004). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Research and Development, 23(3), 247–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.642841.
Barnett, R. (2007). A Will to Learn: Being a Student in an Age of Uncertainty. Maidenhead and New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Chang, E. C., & DeSimone, S. L. (2001). The influence of hope on appraisals, coping, and dysphoria: A test of hope theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20(2), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.20.2.117.22262.
Cockburn, C. (1998). The Space Between Us. Negotiating Gender and National Identities in Conflict. London: Zed Books.
Corner, J. (1999). Introduction: Mapping meaning. In D. Cosgrove (Ed.), Mappings (pp. 1–23). London: Reaktion Books.
Cramer, F. (2015). What is ‘post-digital’? In D. M. Berry & M. Dieter (Eds.), Postdigital aesthetics: Art, computation and design (pp. 12–26). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137437204_2.
Daignault, J. (1983). Curriculum and action-research: An artistic activity in a perverse way. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 5(3), 4–28.
Daignault, J. (1992). Traces of work from different places. In W. Pinar & W. Reynolds (Eds.), Understanding curriculum as phenomenological and deconstructed text (pp. 195–215). New York: Teachers College Press.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
Entwistle, N. (2008). Threshold concepts and transformative ways of thinking in research into higher education. In R. Land, J. H. F. Meyer, & J. Smith (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 21–35). Rotterdam: Sense.
Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for Understanding at University: Deep Approaches and Distinctive Ways of Thinking. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Entwistle, N., & Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709902320634528.
Field, J. (2012). Transitions in lifelong learning: Public issues, private troubles, liminal identities. Studies for the Learning Society, 2(2-3), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10240-012-0001-6.
Fredholm, A., Henningsohn, L., Savin-Baden, M., & Silén, C. (2020). The practice of thresholds: autonomy in clinical education explored through variation theory and the threshold concepts framework. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1567486.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwarzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
Graves, R., Wang, D., & Hogan, M. C. (2011). Ecotone. In C. J. Cleveland (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Earth.
Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-Lopez, P., & Tejeda, C. (1999). Rethinking diversity: Hybridity and hybrid language practices in the third space. Mind, Culture, and Activity: An International Journal, 6(4), 286–303.
Huth, J. E. (2013). The Lost Art of Finding our Way. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jaspers, K. (1953). The Origin and Goal of History. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.
Kiley, M., & Wisker, G. (2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(4), 431–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360903067930.
Land, R., Rattray, J., & Vivian, P. (2014). Learning in the liminal space: A semiotic approach to threshold concepts. Higher Education, 67, 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9705-x.
Lather, P. (2006). Paradigm proliferation as a good thing to think with: teaching research in education as a wild profusion. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500450144.
Lopez, S. J. (2013). Making hope happen: Create the future you want for yourself and others. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2015). Psychological capital and beyond. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1984). Approaches to Learning. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
Meyer, J. H. F., & Land, R. (2006). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: issues of liminality. In J. H. F. Meyer & R. Land (Eds.), Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge Falmer.
Negroponte, N. (1998). Beyond digital. Wired, January 12. http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/6.12/negroponte.html. Accessed 7 March 2022.
Pepperell, R., & Punt, M. (2000). The postdigital membrane: Imagination, technology and desire. Bristol: Intellect Books.
Perkins, D. (1999). The Many Faces of Constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6–11.
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of Intellectual and Ethical Development During the College Years: A Scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience in Higher Education. Maidenhead and New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Rasmussen, H. N., O’Byrne, K. K., Vandamente, M., & Cole, B. P. (2017). Hope and physical health. In M. W. Gallagher & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Hope (pp. 159–168). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rossitto, C., & Eklundh, K. S. (2007). Managing work at several places: a case of project work in a nomadic group of students. In W. P. Brinkman, D. H. Ham, & B. L. W. Wong (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th European conference on cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore! (pp. 45–51). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1362550.1362562.
Ryberg, T., Davidsen, J., Bernhard, J., & Larsen, M. C. (2021). Ecotones: a conceptual contribution to postdigital thinking. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(2), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00213-5.
Ryle, G. (1947). The Concept of Mind. London: Penguin.
Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective. Some common- sense conceptions. Report 76. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg, Department of Education.
Savin-Baden, M. (2021). What are Postdigital Humans? In M. Savin-Baden (Ed.), Postdigital Humans: Transitions, Transformations and Transcendence (pp. 3–15).Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65592-1_1.
Savin-Baden, M. (2008). Learning Spaces. Creating Opportunities for Knowledge Creation in Academic Life. Maidenhead and New York: McGraw Hill.
Slater, F. M. (2016). Ecotones, ecoclines and eco-perturbations: The aquatic flora and fauna of S’Albufera Natural Park, Mallorca: A contribution and review. Mediterranean Journal of Biosciences, 1(3), 120–127.
Snyder, C. R., Shorey, H. S., Cheavens, J., Pulvers, K. M., Adams III, V. H., & Wiklund, C. (2002). Hope and academic success in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.820.
Stanton, A. L., Danoff‐burg, S., & Huggins, M. E. (2002). The first year after breast cancer diagnosis: Hope and coping strategies as predictors of adjustment. Psycho‐Oncology: Journal of the Psychological, Social and Behavioral Dimensions of Cancer, 11(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.574.
Taffel, S. (2016). Perspectives on the postdigital: Beyond rhetorics of progress and novelty. Convergence, 22(3), 324–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1354856514567827
Turner, V. (1995). The Ritual Process: Structure and Antistructure. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Ungar, M. (2019). Change Your World: The Science of Resilience and the True Path to Success. Toronto: Sutherland House.
Wardak, D., Vallis, C., & Bryant, P. (2022). #OurPlace2020: Blurring Boundaries of Learning Spaces. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00264-2.
Wimpenny, K., Beelen. J., & King, V. (2020). Academic development to support the internationalization of the curriculum (IoC): a qualitative research synthesis. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1691559.