Post Dural Puncture Headache following Combined Spinal Epidural or Epidural Anaesthesia in Obstetric Patients

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care - Tập 29 Số 6 - Trang 595-599 - 2001
Marc Van de Velde1,2, An Teunkens1,2, M. Hanssens3,2, F.A. Van Assche3,2, Eugène Vandermeersch1,2
1Department of Anaesthesiology
2Departments of Anaesthesiology, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
3Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Tóm tắt

A retrospective review of obstetric anaesthesia charts was performed for all parturients receiving regional anaesthesia over a 22-month period. The incidence of headache, post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and various other complications of regional anaesthesia that had been prospectively assessed were noted, as was the anaesthetic technique used (epidural or combined spinal epidural (CSE)). PDPH was rare (0.44%) and occurred with similar frequency in those managed with either epidural or CSE anaesthesia or analgesia. The pencil-point spinal needle gauge (27 or 29) did not influence the incidence of PDPH. Following a CSE technique, the epidural catheter more reliably produced effective analgesia/anaesthesia as compared with a standard epidural technique (1.49% versus 3.18% incidence of replaced catheters respectively). We conclude, based on the results of this retrospective review, that CSE is acceptable with respect to the occurrence of PDPH and that it is possible it is advantageous in relation to the correct placement of the epidural catheter.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92602-X

Van de Velde M., 1999, Acta Anaesth Belg, 50, 129

10.1097/00000542-199907000-00038

10.1016/S0196-0644(05)80416-0

10.1177/0310057X9802600115

10.1016/S1098-7339(06)80058-1

10.1097/00000542-199412000-00012

10.1213/00000539-199407000-00023

10.1111/j.1365-2044.1997.191-az0324.x

10.1007/BF03009601

Ross B.K., 1992, Reg Anesth, 17, 29

10.1093/bja/69.6.589

10.1093/bja/45.11.1147

10.1213/00000539-199409000-00022

Weakland H.J., 1994, CRNA, 5, 156

10.1111/j.1399-6576.1993.tb03793.x

10.1016/S0959-289X(99)80007-7

10.1054/ijoa.1999.0301

10.1016/S0959-289X(98)80042-3