Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Identification of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Results From the REDECT Trial

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) - Tập 31 Số 2 - Trang 187-194 - 2013
Chaitanya Divgi1, Robert G. Uzzo1, Constantine Gatsonis1, Roman Bartz1, Silke Treutner1, Jian Q. Yu1, Ying‐Bei Chen1, Jorge A. Carrasquillo1, Steven M. Larson1, Paul Bevan1, Paul Russo1
1Chaitanya R. Divgi, Columbia University; Jorge A. Carrasquillo, Steven Larson, and Paul Russo, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Robert G. Uzzo, Jian Qin Yu, and David Chen, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA; Constantine Gatsonis, Brown University, Providence, RI; Roman Bartz, Silke Treutner, and Paul Bevan, Wilex, Munich, Germany.

Tóm tắt

Purpose A clinical study to characterize renal masses with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was undertaken. Patients and Methods This was an open-label multicenter study of iodine-124 (124I) -girentuximab PET/CT in patients with renal masses who were scheduled for resection. PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) of the abdomen were performed 2 to 6 days after intravenous 124I-girentuximab administration and before resection of the renal mass(es). Images were interpreted centrally by three blinded readers for each imaging modality. Tumor histology was determined by a blinded central pathologist. The primary end points—average sensitivity and specificity for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)—were compared between the two modalities. Agreement between and within readers was assessed. Results 124I-girentuximab was well tolerated. In all, 195 patients had complete data sets (histopathologic diagnosis and PET/CT and CECT results) available. The average sensitivity was 86.2% (95% CI, 75.3% to 97.1%) for PET/CT and 75.5% (95% CI, 62.6% to 88.4%) for CECT (P = .023). The average specificity was 85.9% (95% CI, 69.4% to 99.9%) for PET/CT and 46.8% (95% CI, 18.8% to 74.7%) for CECT (P = .005). Inter-reader agreement was high (κ range, 0.87 to 0.92 for PET/CT; 0.67 to 0.76 for CECT), as was intrareader agreement (range, 87% to 100% for PET/CT; 73.7% to 91.3% for CECT). Conclusion This study represents (to the best of our knowledge) the first clinical validation of a molecular imaging biomarker for malignancy. 124I-girentuximab PET/CT can accurately and noninvasively identify ccRCC, with potential utility for designing best management approaches for patients with renal masses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.3322/caac.20121

10.1097/01.ju.0000096060.92397.ed

10.1056/NEJMcp0910041

Klatte T, 2007, Rev Urol, 9, 47

10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66077-6

10.1097/01.ju.0000148261.19532.2c

10.1200/JCO.2002.11.123

10.1097/00000478-200305000-00005

10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.016

10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.035

10.1016/j.jacr.2010.06.013

10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70803-8

10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.017

10.1002/cncr.24035

10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.021

Larson S, 2011, J Nucl Med, 52

10.1016/j.juro.2008.08.014

10.1021/mp100358f

10.1016/j.eururo.2010.03.015

10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70044-X

10.2214/ajr.178.6.1781499

JN Eble, G Sauter, JI Epstein , etal: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs 2004 Lyon, France IARC Press

10.1080/03610919508813243

10.2307/2529310

10.1016/j.urology.2006.04.011

10.1089/end.2006.9937

10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.013

10.1097/01.ju.0000095475.12515.5e

10.2214/AJR.06.0220

10.1097/01.ju.0000120147.51090.2b

10.1016/S0022-5347(05)68929-X

10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02641.x

10.1016/j.juro.2007.08.124

Herts BR, 1995, Semin Urol Oncol, 13, 254

10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.519

10.1016/j.juro.2007.03.131

10.1002/cncr.26369

10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.030

10.1177/1756287209105264

Povoski SP, Surg Innov

10.1200/JCO.2005.01.891

10.2967/jnumed.108.057174

10.1016/j.hoc.2011.04.005

10.2310/7290.2009.00033

10.1677/ERC-09-0078

10.1007/s10549-008-9953-0