Poroelastic model parameter identification using artificial neural networks: on the effects of heterogeneous porosity and solid matrix Poisson ratio
Tóm tắt
Predictive analysis of poroelastic materials typically require expensive and time-consuming multiscale and multiphysics approaches, which demand either several simplifications or costly experimental tests for model parameter identification.This problem motivates us to develop a more efficient approach to address complex problems with an acceptable computational cost. In particular, we employ artificial neural network (ANN) for reliable and fast computation of poroelastic model parameters. Based on the strong-form governing equations for the poroelastic problem derived from asymptotic homogenisation, the weighted residuals formulation of the cell problem is obtained. Approximate solution of the resulting linear variational boundary value problem is achieved by means of the finite element method. The advantages and downsides of macroscale properties identification via asymptotic homogenisation and the application of ANN to overcome parameter characterisation challenges caused by the costly solution of cell problems are presented. Numerical examples, in this study, include spatially dependent porosity and solid matrix Poisson ratio for a generic model problem, application in tumour modelling, and utilisation in soil mechanics context which demonstrate the feasibility of the presented framework.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Maurice AB (1941) General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12:155–164
Pride SR, Gangi AF, Morgan FD (1992) Deriving the equations of motion for porous isotropic media. J Acoust Soc Am 92(6):3278–3290
Pride SR, Berryman JG (1998) Connecting theory to experiment in poroelasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 46(4):719–747
James GB (2005) Comparison of upscaling methods in poroelasticity and its generalizations. J Eng Mech 131(9):928–936
Dehghani H, Penta R, Merodio J (2019) The role of porosity and solid matrix compressibility on the mechanical behavior of poroelastic tissues. Mater Res Exp 6(3):035404
Penta R, Gerisch A (2016) Investigation of the potential of asymptotic homogenization for elastic composites via a three-dimensional computational study. Comput Vis Sci 17:01
Hori M, Nemat-Nasser S (1999) On two micromechanics theories for determining micro-macro relations in heterogeneous solid. Mech Mater 31:667–682
Burridge R, Keller JB (1981) Poroelasticity equations derived from microstructure. J Acoust Soc Am 70(4):1140–1146
Penta R, Ambrosi D, Shipley RJ (2014) Effective governing equations for poroelastic growing media. Q J Mech Appl Math 67(1):69–91
Dehghani H (2019) Mechanical modeling of poroelastic and residually stressed hyperelastic materials and its application to biological tissues. Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad politécnica de Madrid
Dehghani H, Noll I, Penta R, Menzel A, Merodio J (2020) The role of microscale solid matrix compressibility on the mechanical behaviour of poroelastic materials. Eur J Mech A/Solids, p 103996
Bock FE, Aydin RC, Cyron CJ, Huber N, Kalidindi SR, Klusemann B (2019) A review of the application of machine learning and data mining approaches in continuum materials mechanics. Front Mater 6:110
Cherkassky V, Mulier FM (2007) Learning from data: concepts, theory, and methods. Wiley-IEEE Press, New York
Ramprasad R, Batra R, Pilania G, Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A, Kim C (2017) Machine learning in materials informatics: recent applications and prospects. npj Comput Mater 3(1):54
Rosenblatt F (1958) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65:386
Oishi A, Yagawa G (2017) Computational mechanics enhanced by deep learning. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 327:09
Kirchdoerfer T, Ortiz M (2016) Data-driven computational mechanics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 304:81–101
Teichert G, Garikipati K (2018) Machine learning materials physics: Surrogate optimization and multi-fidelity algorithms predict precipitate morphology in an alternative to phase field dynamics. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 344:10
Zdunek A, Rachowicz W (2018) A mixed finite element formulation for compressible finite hyperelasticity with two fibre family reinforcement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:11
Stainier L, Leygue A, Ortiz M (2019) Model-free data-driven methods in mechanics: material data identification and solvers. Comput Mech 64(2):381–393
Liu Z, Ct Wu, Koishi M (2018) A deep material network for multiscale topology learning and accelerated nonlinear modeling of heterogeneous materials. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 345:1138–1168
Zhang S, Yin S (2014) Determination of in situ stresses and elastic parameters from hydraulic fracturing tests by geomechanics modeling and soft computing. J Petrol Sci Eng 124:09
Su F, Larsson F, Runesson K (2011) Computational homogenization of coupled consolidation problems in micro-heterogeneous porous media. Int J Numer Meth Eng 88(11):1198–1218
Yang H, Tang S, Liu W (2019) Derivation of heterogeneous material laws via data-driven principal component expansions. Comput Mech 64:05
Liu Z, Ct Wu (2019) Exploring the 3d architectures of deep material network in data-driven multiscale mechanics. J Mech Phys Solids 127:03
Lähivaara T, Kärkkäinen L, Huttunen JMJ, Hesthaven JS (2018) Deep convolutional neural networks for estimating porous material parameters with ultrasound tomography. J Acoust Soc Am 143(2):1148–1158
Vasilyeva M, Tyrylgin A (2018) Machine learning for accelerating effective property prediction for poroelasticity problem in stochastic media. 10
Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780
Alnæs M, Blechta J, Hake J, Johansson A, Kehlet B, Logg A, Richardson C, Ring J, Rognes M, Wells G (2015) The fenics project version 1.5. 3, 01
Penta R, Gerisch A (2016) The asymptotic homogenization elasticity tensor properties for composites with material discontinuities. Continuum Mech Thermodyn 29:08
Taber LA (1995) Biomechanics of growth, remodeling, and morphogenesis. Appl Mech Rev 48(8):487–545
Schmidhuber J (2015) Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw 61:85–117
Parisi G, Kemker R, Part J, Kanan C, Wermter S (2018) Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: a review. Neural Netw 02
Itakura F, Saito S (1968) Analysis synthesis telephony based upon the maximum likelihood method. In The 6th international congress on acoustics, pp 280–292
Kingma D, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization., vol 12
Paszke A, Gross S, Chintala S, Chanan G, Yang E, DeVito Z, Lin Z, Desmaison A, Antiga L, Lerer A (2017) Automatic differentiation in pytorch
Nabovati A, Hinebaugh J, Bazylak A, Amon C (2014) Effect of porosity heterogeneity on the permeability and tortuosity of gas diffusion layers in polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells. J Power Sour 248:83–90
Nield DA, Bejan A (2017) Convection in porous media. Springer, Berlin
Lee K, Sills GC (1981) The consolidation of a soil stratum, including self-weight effects and large strains. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 5(4):405–428
Prabhakaran R, Pater H, Shaoul J (2017) Pore pressure effects on fracture net pressure and hydraulic fracture containment: insights from an empirical and simulation approach. J Petrol Sci Eng 157:07
Cuss R, Harrington J (2016) An experimental study of the potential for fault reactivation during changes in gas and pore-water pressure. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 53:41–55
Wu M, Frieboes H, Chaplain M, Mcdougall S, Cristini V, Lowengrub J (2014) The effect of interstitial pressure on therapeutic agent transport: coupling with the tumor blood and lymphatic vascular systems. J Theoret Biol 355:194–207
Rofstad E, Galappathi K, Mathiesen B (2014) Tumor interstitial fluid pressure–a link between tumor hypoxia, microvascular density, and lymph node metastasis. Neoplasia 16:586–594
Bae K, Park Y (2011) Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myths, realityand possibility. J Controll Release Off J Controlled Release Soc 153:198–205
Karagianni A, Karoutzos G, Ktena S, Vagenas N, Vlachopoulos I, Sabatakakis N, Koukis G (2017) Elastic properties of rocks. Bull Geol Soc Greece 43:1165
Rudnicki J, Rice J (2006) Effective normal stress alteration due to pore pressure changes induced by dynamic slip propagation on a plane between dissimilar materials. J Geophys Res 111:10
Sefidgar M, Soltani M, Raahemifar K, Bazmara H, Nayinian S, Bazargan M (2014) Effect of tumor shape, size, and tissue transport properties on drug delivery to solid tumors. J Biol Eng 8:12
Islam MdT, Righetti R (2019) Estimation of mechanical parameters in cancers by empirical orthogonal function analysis of poroelastography data. Comput Biol Med 111:103343
Malandrino A, Mak M, Kamm R, Moeendarbary E (2018) Complex mechanics of the heterogeneous extracellular matrix in cancer. Extreme Mech Lett 21:02
Hartono D, Liu Y, Tan P, Then X, Yung L, Lim K (2011) On-chip measurements of cell compressibility via acoustic radiation. Lab on a Chip 11:4072–80
Li J, Lowengrub J (2013) The effects of cell compressibility, motility and contact inhibition on the growth of tumor cell clusters using the cellular potts model. J Theor Biol 343:11
Jurvelin JS, Buschmann MD, Hunziker EB (1997) Optical and mechanical determination of poisson’s ratio of adult bovine humeral articular cartilage. J Biomech 30(3):235–241
Fung YC (1989) Connecting incremental shear modulus and poisson’s ratio of lung tissue with morphology and rheology of microstructure. Biorheology 26(2):279–289
Tilleman T, Tilleman M, Neumann MHA (2004) The elastic properties of cancerous skin: Poisson’s ratio and young’s modulus. Israel Med Assoc J IMAJ 6:753–755
Bakas S, Akbari H, Sotiras A, Bilello M, Rozycki M, Kirby JS, Freymann JB, Farahani K, Davatzikos C (2017) Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma mri collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features. Sci Data 4(1):170117
Gallaher JA, Brown JS, Anderson ARA (2019) The impact of proliferation-migration tradeoffs on phenotypic evolution in cancer. Sci Rep 9(1):2425
Jain R, Martin J, Stylianopoulos T (2014) The role of mechanical forces in tumor growth and therapy. Ann Rev Biomed Eng 16:321–46
Penta R, Miller L, Grillo A, Ramírez-Torres A, Mascheroni P, Rodríguez-Ramos R (2019) Porosity and diffusion in biological tissues. Recent advances and further perspectives. Springer, Cham, pp 311–356
Loret B, Simões F (2016) Biomechanical aspects of soft tissues. CRC Press, New York
Basser PJ (1992) Interstitial pressure, volume, and flow during infusion into brain tissue. Microvasc Res 44(2):143–165
Zilian A, Dinkler D, Vehre A (2009) Projection-based reduction of fluid-structure interaction systems using monolithic space-time modes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 198(47–48):3795–3805
Ravi S, Zilian A (2016) Numerical modeling of flow-driven piezoelectric energy harvesting devices. In: Computational methods for solids and fluids. Computational methods in applied sciences; vol 41, pp 399–426. Springer, Berlin
Legay A, Zilian A, Janssen C (2011) A rheological interface model and its space-time finite element formulation for fluid-structure interaction. Int J Numer Meth Eng 86(6):667–687