Polypeptides. VIII. Molecular configurations of poly‐L‐glutamic acid in water‐dioxane solution

Wiley - Tập 23 Số 104 - Trang 851-861 - 1957
Paul Doty1, Akira Wada1, Jen Tsi Yang1, Elkan Blout2,3
1Department of Chemistry, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
2Chemical Research Laboratory, Polaroid Corporation, Cambridge 39, Massachusetts.
3Children's Cancer Research Foundation, The Children's Medical Center, Boston 15, Massachusetts

Tóm tắt

Abstract

The configuration of a poly‐L‐glutamic acid sample of 34,000 molecular weight has been studied in 0.2 M NaCl‐dioxane (2:1) as a function of pH and temperature by intrinsic viscosity, optical rotation, optical rotatory dispersion and infrared spectroscopy. The intrinsic viscosity and specific rotation fall sharply in the pH range of 5.4–6.4 reaching values that remain constant at higher pH. The indications that these changes correspond to a reversible helix‐random coil transition are substantiated by the demonstration that the optical rotatory dispersion shifts from the type characteristic of helices to the normal type as the pH is increased through the same region. Further evidence of the transition is found in infrared spectroscopic studies in solutions in which D2O has replaced H2O. The temperature dependence of the specific rotation and infrared spectra shows that within the pH region of 5.4 to 6.4 the equilibrium is shifted toward the coiled configuration by an increase in temperature. The analogy of this behavior with protein denaturation is obvious. It is noted that the transition from the helix to the coil does not begin until about 40% of the residues have become charged. The implications of the ability of the helical configuration to withstand this degree of electrostatic repulsion within its side groups is discussed in relation to the configuration of proteins.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1073/pnas.37.4.205

10.1073/pnas.37.5.235

10.1038/1671053a0

10.1098/rspb.1953.0016

10.1098/rspb.1953.0012

10.1098/rsta.1955.0002

10.1098/rspa.1951.0016

10.1098/rspa.1951.0145

Elliott A., 1953, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London), 221, 104

W. E.Hanby S. G.Waley andJ.Watson J. Chem. Soc. 1950 3239.

10.1021/ja01583a069

10.1021/ja01646a078

10.1021/ja01646a079

10.1021/ja01586a020

10.1021/ja01586a021

10.1021/ja01586a022

10.1021/ja01583a070

(b) We should like to draw attention to the erroneous implication contained in the last sentence of the penultimate paragraph of reference 11(a). Schellman does not neglect the role of the solvent in his discussions but does not consider it necessary to take special account as is proper in the cases he treats of the entropy arising from solvent immobilization. In our view this must be done in the case of much heavier solvating molecules and therein lies the explanation at the molecular level of the negative entropy of denaturation.

A.WadaandP.Doty unpublished results.

10.1038/175129a0

10.1063/1.1742946

E. R.Blout P.Doty andJ. T.Yang submitted to theJ. Am. Chem. Soc.;

10.1021/ja01599a072

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. in press.

10.1098/rspa.1954.0265

R. E.RichardsandH. W.Thompson J. Chem. Soc. 1947 1248.

E. R.Blout M. S.Simon andA.Asadourian to be published.

10.1016/0003-9861(55)90195-8

Schellman J. A., 1955, Compt. rend. trav. Lab. Carlsberg, Sér. chim., 29