Politeness and Honesty Contribute Additively to the Interpretation of Scalar Expressions

Journal of Language and Social Psychology - Tập 32 Số 2 - Trang 181-190 - 2013
Aidan Feeney1, Jean‐François Bonnefon2
1Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK
2Université de Toulouse 2–Le Mirail, Toulouse, France

Tóm tắt

Scalar terms have been the focus of much recent attention. People can interpret such terms narrowly, for example, interpreting A or B to convey A or B but not both, on the grounds that a speaker would have explicitly used a more informative term (i.e., and) had he or she been in a position to do so; or they can interpret such terms broadly ( A or B or both). Examined here are the effects of politeness contexts and self-rated honesty on people’s interpretation of the scalar connective or. In two experiments, it is shown that participants are less likely to adopt the narrow interpretation when the communicative context is face threatening, and that regardless of context, participants high in self-rated honesty adopt the narrow interpretation to a greater extent than those low in self-rated honesty. These results are consistent with the claim that an assumption of honesty underlies certain pragmatic inferences and suggest that personality may be an important source of individual differences in language interpretation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.2307/1130104

10.1080/13546783.2010.503044

Bonnefon J. F., 2011, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society

10.1177/0963721411418472

10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.005

10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01776.x

10.1016/j.jml.2004.05.006

10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.003

10.1017/CBO9780511813085

10.1080/17470210701712960

10.1027/1618-3169.54.2.128

10.1037/h0085792

10.1017/CBO9780511975158

10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007

Grice H. P., 1989, Studies in the way of words

Horn L., 2004, The Handbook of Pragmatics, 3

Horn L. R., 1984, Meaning, form, and use in context, 11

10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.09.001

10.1037/a0016704

10.1016/j.cognition.2011.02.015

10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001

10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646

10.1016/j.jml.2010.06.005

10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00114-1

10.1080/13546780244000079

10.1057/978-1-349-73908-0_10

10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.009

10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00179-8

Peterson C., 2004, Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification

10.1016/j.pec.2010.09.005

10.1207/s15327957pspr0901_3

Sperber D., 1995, Relevance, communication and cognition

10.1353/mpq.2002.0009

10.1177/0165025406073530