Plastid phylogenomics and molecular evolution of Alismatales
Tóm tắt
Past phylogenetic studies of the monocot order Alismatales left several higher‐order relationships unresolved. We addressed these uncertainties using a nearly complete genus‐level sampling of whole plastid genomes (gene sets representing 83 protein‐coding and ribosomal genes) from members of the core alismatid families, Tofieldiaceae and additional taxa (Araceae and other angiosperms). Parsimony and likelihood analyses inferred generally highly congruent phylogenetic relationships within the order, and several alternative likelihood partitioning schemes had little impact on patterns of clade support. All families with multiple genera were resolved as monophyletic, and we inferred strong bootstrap support for most inter‐ and intrafamilial relationships. The precise placement of Tofieldiaceae in the order was not well supported. Although most analyses inferred Tofieldiaceae to be the sister‐group of the rest of the order, one likelihood analysis indicated a contrasting Araceae‐sister arrangement.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Barrett C.F., 2014, Investigating the path of plastid genome degradation in an early‐transitional clade of heterotrophic orchids, and implications for heterotrophic angiosperms, Mol. Biol. Evol., 12, 2095
Chase M.W., 2000, Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, 3
Chen J.‐M., 2004, Evolution of apocarpy in Alismatidae using phylogenetic evidence from chloroplast rbcL gene sequence data, Bot. Bull. Acad. Sinica, 45, 33
Edwards A.W.F., 1972, Likelihood
Les D.H., 1995, Monocotyledons: Systematics and Evolution, 353
Lewis L.A., 2001, A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data, Syst. Bot., 50, 913
Li X., 2007, The higher‐level phylogeny of monocots based on matK, rbcL and 18S rDNA sequences, J. Syst. Evol., 45, 113
Mabberley D.J., 1997, The Plant‐Book
Maddison W.P. Maddison D.R. 2007.Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 2.0 http://mesquiteproject.org.
Mering S., 2010, Diversity, Phylogeny, and Evolution in the Monocotyledons, 55
Pagel M., 1999, The maximum likelihood approach to reconstructing ancestral character states of discrete characters on phylogenies, Syst. Bot., 48, 612
Posluszny U., 2000, Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, 63
Rambaut A., 2002, Se‐Al Sequence Alignment Editor, Ver. 2.0a11
Sculthorpe C.D., 1967, The Biology of Aquatic Vascular Plants
Stamatakis A. 2006b.Phylogenetic models of rate heterogeneity: a high performance computing perspective. Proceedings of 20th IEEE/ACM International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium IPDPS2006 High Performance Computational Biology Workshop Rhodos Greece April 2006.
Stevenson D.W., 2000, Monocots: Systematics and Evolution, 17
Swofford D.L., 2003, PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony *and Other Methods. Version 4
Thiers B. continuously updated.Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium.http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/.