Plan-Led Planning Systems in Development-Led Practices: An Empirical Analysis into the (Lack of) Institutionalisation of Planning Law

Environment and Planning A - Tập 43 Số 4 - Trang 928-941 - 2011
Edwin Buitelaar1, Maaike Galle1, Niels Sorel1
1PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Oranjebuitensingel 6, PO Box 30314, 2500 GH The Hague, The Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Planning laws are usually made with good intentions, but do not always lead to good results—at least not when measured against their own goals. Since July 2008 the Netherlands has had a new planning act which aims for a plan-led system and a stronger role of the land-use plan in providing a framework for building permits—instead of these being granted through exemptions from the land-use plan—and in guiding spatial development. On the basis of quantitative data, we found that the land-use plan has become more important: more land-use plans have been adopted, both in absolute terms and relative to alternative measures. But functionally, these land-use plans are used primarily to follow and facilitate development instead of guiding it. Development control is still (inevitably) driven by development proposals. Although the paper looks at the Dutch case, an analysis into the relationship between planning law and its institutionalisation (or the lack thereof) at the local level is worthwhile for a wider audience. In our quest to understand the effects of changes in the law on the practice of development control, we use theories that look at the process of institutionalisation, especially of centrally designed formal institutions, such as legislation, that seek application at the local level, with its own (potentially conflicting) formal and informal institutions. We conclude the paper by arguing that changes in planning law are unsuccessful if they are not congruent with informal and formal institutions at the ‘street-level’ and if there is a lack of sufficient incentives to change the behaviour of local actors.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/1473095205058494

10.1068/a37335

Bolan R S, 1996, Explorations in Planning Theory, 497

10.4324/9780203451489_chapter_1

Buitelaar E, 2009, Ex-durante evaluatie Wro: evaluatieontwerp en nulmeting

10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.01.002

10.1068/a38191

Chavance B, 2008, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 5, 57

10.4324/9780203004258

10.1068/a42184

10.1007/978-94-017-2927-7

Giddens A, 1984, The Constitution of Modernity

Gualini E, 2001, Planning and the Intelligence of Institutions: Interactive Approaches to Territorial Policy-making between Institutional Design and Institution Building

10.1007/978-1-349-25538-2

10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00502.x

10.1017/S1537592704040472

10.1177/0739456X9501400307

Knieling J, 2009, Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning

Laws D, 2006, The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, 409

Lipsky M, 1980, Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services

March J G, 1989, Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics

10.1068/b240815

10.1177/1473095207077586

Nadin V, 1997, The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems

10.1080/02697450600568662

Needham B, 2007, Dutch Land Use Planning: Planning and Managing Land-use in the Netherlands

10.4324/9780203427941

10.1017/CBO9780511808678

PBL, 2010, Ex-durante evaluatie Wet ruimtelijke ordening: eerste resultaten

Pejovich S, 1999, Journal of Markets and Morality, 2, 164

Pressmann J, 1973, Implementation

Salet WGM, 1994, Om recht en staat: een sociologische verkenning van sociale, politieke en rechtsbetrekkingen

Salet W, 2000, The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning

Sanyal B, 2005, Comparative Planning Cultures

Scott J C, 1998, Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed

10.4324/9780203799482

Thomas H D, 1983, Flexibility and Commitment in Planning: A Comparative Study of Local Planning and Development in the Netherlands and England

van Buuren PJJ, 2008, Van WRO naar Wro

10.1068/b240833

van der Velde J, 2009, Met globale bestemmingsplannen meer mogelijkheden

10.1007/978-3-540-24739-5_4

10.1007/s11127-009-9399-x