Placement Disruption in Treatment Foster Care

Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders - Tập 9 Số 3 - Trang 200-205 - 2001
Dana K. Smith1, Elizabeth A. Stormshak2, Patricia Chamberlain3, Rachel Bridges Whaley4
1Oregon Social Learning Center, 160 E. 4th Ave., Eugene, OR 97401-2426, danas @oslc.org
2University of Oregon
3Oregon Social Learning Center's Treatment Foster Care (TFC) programs
4Oregon Social Learning Center

Tóm tắt

Rates of placement disruption in traditional and treatment foster care are reviewed. Contextual factors, individual child and caregiver characteristics, and risk factors thought to influence rates of placement disruption are explored. A model for treatment foster care is described, and data are presented on disruption rates for this program. The results indicated that the likelihood of placement disruption is two times higher during the first 6 months (17.8%) compared to the second 6 months (9.2%) of treatment.Taken together across the first and second 6 months of treatment, 23 of 90 youth (25.5%) experienced a placement disruption. Findings indicate that age and gender play a role in disruption, with older girls at the greatest risk for placement disruption. Limitations of the study, future directions,and implications for treatment are discussed.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

American Psychiatric Association., 1994, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4

Berrick, J.D., 1998, The tender years: Toward developmentally sensitive child welfare services for very young children

Bums, B.J., 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 30, 144

Chamberlain, P., 1994, Family connections: Treatment Foster Care for adolescents with delinquency

Chamberlain, P., 1998, Multidimensional treatment fostercare

10.1007/BF02233909

10.1037/0022-006X.66.4.624

10.2307/1131876

10.2307/1131945

10.1037/h0079210

10.1007/BF00758261

10.7312/fans91188

10.1037/0012-1649.33.4.589

Goldstein, J., 1973, Beyond the best interests of the child

10.1093/swr/18.4.198

Kutash, K., 1996, What works in children's mental health services?

Lieberman, A.F. (1987). Separation in infancy and early childhood: Contributions of attachment theory and psychoanalysis. In J. Bloom-Feshbach & S. Bloom-Feshbach et al. (Eds.), The psychology of separation and loss: Perspectives on development, life transitions, and clinical practice (pp. 109-135). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Meadowcroft, P., 1994, Child Welfare, 33, 565

Millham, S., 1986, Lost in care

10.1037/0022-006X.62.4.718

10.1016/0190-7409(96)00025-4

10.1093/sw/29.6.506

10.1080/0300443850220204

10.1016/0190-7409(95)00023-6

Stone, N.M., 1983, The Journal of Contemporary Social Work, 1, 11

Timbers, G. (1990). Describing the children served in treatment homes . In P. Meadowcroft & B. Trout (Eds.), Troubled youth in treatment homes: A handbook of therapeutic foster care (pp. 21-32). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.

U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Ways and Means., 1994, Overview of entitlement programs: 1994 green book

Van der Kolk, B.A. (1987). The separation cry and the trauma response: Developmental issues in the psychobiology of attachment and separation. In B. A. Van der Kolk (Ed.), Psychological Trauma (pp. 31-62). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association .

Walsh, J.A., 1990, Quality care for tough kids: Studies of the maintenance of subsidized foster placements in the Casey Family Program