Phylogenetic signals and predictability in plant–soil feedbacks

New Phytologist - Tập 228 Số 4 - Trang 1440-1449 - 2020
Elizabeth M. Wandrag1,2,3, Sarah E. Bates2, Luke G. Barrett4, Jane A. Catford5,6, Peter H. Thrall4, Wim H. van der Putten1,7, Richard P. Duncan2
1Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), PO Box 50, Wageningen, 6700 AB the Netherlands
2Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2617, Australia
3School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW, 2350, Australia
4CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
5Department of Geography, King's College London, London, WC2B 4BG, UK
6School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
7Laboratory of Nematology, Wageningen University, PO Box 8123, Wageningen, 6700 ES the Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Summary

There is strong evidence for a phylogenetic signal in the degree to which species share co‐evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions. This implies there should be a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of feedbacks between plants and the soil microbiota they cultivate. However, attempts to identify a phylogenetic signal in plant–soil feedbacks have produced mixed results.

Here we clarify how phylogenetic signals could arise in plant–soil feedbacks and use a recent compilation of data from feedback experiments to identify: whether there is a phylogenetic signal in the outcome of plant–soil feedbacks; and whether any signal arises through directional or divergent changes in feedback outcomes with evolutionary time.

We find strong evidence for a divergent phylogenetic signal in feedback outcomes. Distantly related plant species show more divergent responses to each other’s soil microbiota compared with closely related plant species. The pattern of divergence implies occasional co‐evolutionary shifts in how plants interact with soil microbiota, with strongly contrasting feedback responses among some plant lineages.

Our results highlight that it is difficult to predict feedback outcomes from phylogeny alone, other than to say that more closely related species tend to have more similar responses.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/ele.12378

10.1073/pnas.1611525114

10.1111/evo.12966

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00905.x

10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00714.x

10.1046/j.1420-9101.2002.00472.x

10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13975.x

10.1111/nph.14077

10.1111/ele.13278

10.1111/nph.16423

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01474.x

10.1007/s10530-010-9824-6

10.1186/s12862-014-0226-8

10.1111/1365-2745.12709

10.1214/ss/1177011136

10.1111/nph.15504

10.1371/journal.pone.0123758

10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-045959

10.1073/pnas.0607968104

Harvey PH, 1991, The comparative method in evolutionary biology, 10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001

Hoeksema JD, 2018, Evolutionary history of plant hosts and fungal symbionts predicts the strength of mycorrhizal mutualism, Communications Biology, 1, 1

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x

10.2307/1942661

10.1086/707355

10.1111/ele.13280

10.1002/ecy.2145

10.1111/1365-2745.13143

10.1007/s00442-018-4145-z

10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01715.x

10.1201/b13613

10.1002/ece3.1487

10.1111/nph.13238

10.1007/s11104-014-2336-x

10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00196.x

10.1038/nature14372

PlummerM.2003.JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling.Proceedings of the 3rdInternational Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing (DSC 2003)124:20–22.

10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.006

10.1038/ismej.2007.9

10.1002/ecs2.2409

10.1093/aobpla/plx005

VehtariA GabryJ MagnussonM YaoY BürknerP‐C PaananenT GelmanA.2020.loo: Efficient leave‐one‐out cross‐validation and WAIC for Bayesian models. R package v.2.3.1. [WWW document] URLhttps://mc‐stan.org/loo[accessed 20 April 2020].

10.1007/s11222-016-9696-4

10.1038/s41467-019-09615-x