Phase III Trial of Carboplatin Plus Paclitaxel With or Without Gemcitabine in First-Line Treatment of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) - Tập 28 Số 27 - Trang 4162-4169 - 2010
Andreas du Bois1, Jørn Herrstedt1, Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard1, Hans-Helge Müller1, Philipp Harter1, Gunnar B. Kristensen1, Florence Joly1, Jens Huober1, Elisabeth Åvall‐Lundqvist1, B. Weber1, Christian Kurzeder1, S. Jelić1, Éric Pujade-Lauraine1, Alexander Burges1, Jacobus Pfisterer1, M. Gropp1, A. Staehle1, Pauline Wimberger1, Christian Jackisch1, Jalid Sehouli1
1From the Dr Horst Schmidt Klinik (HSK), Wiesbaden; Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Philipps-Universität, Marburg; University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen; University Hospital Ulm, Ulm; Klinikum Großhadern, München; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel; Evangelisches Krankenhaus, Duesseldorf; St Vincentius Kliniken, Karlsruhe; University Hospital Essen, Essen; Klinikum Offenbach, Offenbach; Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; Odense University Hospital, Odense...

Tóm tắt

Purpose One attempt to improve long-term survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer was thought to be the addition of more non–cross-resistant drugs to platinum-paclitaxel combination regimens. Gemcitabine was among the candidates for a third drug. Patients and Methods We performed a prospective, randomized, phase III, intergroup trial to compare carboplatin plus paclitaxel (TC; area under the curve [AUC] 5 and 175 mg/m2, respectively) with the same combination and additional gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (TCG) in previously untreated patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. TC was administered intravenously (IV) on day 1 every 21 days for a planned minimum of six courses. Gemcitabine was administered by IV on days 1 and 8 of each cycle in the TCG arm. Results Between 2002 and 2004, 1,742 patients were randomly assigned; 882 and 860 patients received TC and TCG, respectively. Grades 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity and fatigue occurred more frequently in the TCG arm. Accordingly, quality-of-life analysis during chemotherapy showed a disadvantage in the TCG arm. Although objective response was slightly higher in the TCG arm, this did not translate into improved progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS). Median PFS was 17.8 months for the TCG arm and 19.3 months for the TC arm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.32; P = .0044). Median OS was 49.5 for the TCG arm and 51.5 months for the TC arm (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.20; P = .5106). Conclusion The addition of gemcitabine to carboplatin plus paclitaxel increased treatment burden, reduced PFS time, and did not improve OS in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Therefore, we recommend no additional clinical use of TCG in this population.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1056/NEJM199601043340101

10.1093/jnci/92.9.699

10.1093/jnci/djg036

10.1200/JCO.2003.02.153

10.1200/JCO.2006.09.6735

10.1200/JCO.2007.13.6606

10.1023/A:1011605008922

10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.018

10.1200/JCO.2006.06.0913

10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.03.032

10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.042

10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00795.x

10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.10.020

10.1200/jco.2009.27.18_suppl.lba5510

International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 1987, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 156, 263, 10.1016/0002-9378(87)90261-4

10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1748

10.7326/0003-4819-79-4-604

Common Toxicity Criteria National Cancer Institute Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program http://ctep.cancer.gov/reporting/ctc.html

10.1093/jnci/85.5.365

10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00307-1

Fayers PM, 1999, The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual (ed 2)

10.1093/jnci/92.3.205

10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2938

10.2307/2530299

10.1002/sim.4780131308

10.1002/sim.1852

Kristensen GB, 2004, J Clin Oncol, 23, 448

10.1200/JCO.2008.19.1684

10.1093/jnci/djj296

Hoskins PJ, 2008, J Clin Oncol, 26, 294s, 10.1200/jco.2008.26.15_suppl.lba5505

Scarfone G, 2006, J Clin Oncol, 24, 256s, 10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.5003

10.1056/NEJMoa020177

Alberts DS, 2008, Gynecol Oncol, 109, 174, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.01.005

10.1200/JCO.2008.20.8223

10.1200/JCO.2005.06.679

10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.05.008

10.1200/JCO.2008.21.0807

10.1200/JCO.2007.14.8197

10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.62