Perception versus reality—findings from a phosphor plate quality assurance study
Tài liệu tham khảo
2003, Measurements, N.C.O.R.P.A., NCRP Report No. 145 Radiation Protection in Dentistry
Stamatakis, 2000, Physical properties of a photostimulable phosphor system for intra-oral radiography, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 29, 28, 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600497
Ergun, 2009, How many times can we use a phosphor plate? A preliminary study, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 38, 42, 10.1259/dmfr/61622880
Huda, 1997, Comparison of a photostimulable phosphor system with film for dental radiology, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 83, 725, 10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90327-9
Hayakawa, 1998, Intraoral radiographic storage phosphor image mean pixel values and signal-to-noise ratio: effects of calibration, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 86, 601, 10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90354-7
Bedard, 2004, Storage phosphor plates: How durable are they as a digital dental radiographic system?, J Contemp Dent Pract, 5, 57, 10.5005/jcdp-5-2-57
Kalathingal, 2010, Rating the extent of surface scratches on photostimulable storage phosphor plates in a dental school environment, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 39, 179, 10.1259/dmfr/28972644
Metsälä, 2014, Quality assurance in digital dental imaging: a systematic review, Acta Odontol Scand, 72, 362, 10.3109/00016357.2013.840736
Moyal, 2003, Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT) Tabulation and Graphical Summary of the 1999 Dental Radiography Survey, 83
Geissler, 2007, Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) as a quality parameter in fMRI, J Magn Reson Imaging, 25, 1263, 10.1002/jmri.20935
Bechara, 2012, Metal artefact reduction with cone beam CT: an in vitro study, Dentomaxillofac Radiol, 41, 248, 10.1259/dmfr/80899839
2011, 53