Pedestrian mobility in Mobility as a Service (MaaS): sustainable value potential and policy implications in the Paris region case

European Transport Research Review - Tập 15 - Trang 1-20 - 2023
Laura Mariana Reyes Madrigal1,2, Isabelle Nicolaï1, Jakob Puchinger1,3
1Laboratoire Génie Industriel (LGI), Université Paris-Saclay, CentraleSupélec, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
2Anthropolis Chair, IRT SystemX, Palaiseau, France
3EM Normandie Business School, Métis Lab, Clichy, France

Tóm tắt

Pedestrian mobility remains neglected in MaaS solutions, yet it has the potential to become a tool for promoting public policies and more sustainable lifestyles away from excessive private car use. This research identifies the potential for sustainable value creation and the transversal implications for policymakers and other MaaS stakeholders of overlooking walking in innovations like MaaS. To do so, we explore how walking is currently integrated into four MaaS solutions in the Paris region. Our main findings show heterogeneity in the hierarchy given to walking in the user interfaces and the determinant roles of governance and policy in supporting the prioritization of pedestrian mobility in MaaS.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Énergie (ADEME). (2022). Développer le réseau piétonnier. Fiche action Cit’ergie. [Gov]. Territoires et climat—Mobilisons nos énergies. https://www.territoires-climat.ademe.fr/ressource/566-208 Allam, Z., Bibri, S. E., Chabaud, D., & Moreno, C. (2022). The ‘15-Minute City’ concept can shape a net-zero urban future. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01145-0 Alyavina, E., Nikitas, A., & Tchouamou Njoya, E. (2020). Mobility as a service and sustainable travel behaviour: A thematic analysis study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 73, 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.07.004 A/RES/70/1 Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, United Nations General Assembly, 17th session, Agenda items 15 and 116 1 (2015). https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcompact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf Anagnostopoulou, E., Urbančič, J., Bothos, E., Magoutas, B., Bradesko, L., Schrammel, J., & Mentzas, G. (2020). From mobility patterns to behavioural change: Leveraging travel behaviour and personality profiles to nudge for sustainable transportation. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 54(1), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-018-0528-1 Arias-Molinares, D., & García-Palomares, J. C. (2020). The Ws of MaaS: Understanding mobility as a service fromaliterature review. IATSS Research, 44(3), 253–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2020.02.001 Assemblée des Communautés de France (AdCF) & CEREMA (2020). Loi Mobilité: Les Communautés de communes et la compétences mobilité—Mode d’emploi (p. 12). CEREMA. Audouin, M., & Finger, M. (2018). The development of mobility-as-a-service in the Helsinki metropolitan area: A multi-level governance analysis. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 27, 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.09.001 Bajolle, H., Kabbadj, N., de Leyris, R., & Chrétien, J. (2022). WeWard—Étude des effets sur la mobilité: Analyse des opportunités économiques liées au dispositif de CEE. Rapport 6t Bureau de recherche. Paris. 22 p. https://www.6-t.co/etudes/analyse-des-opportunites-economiques-liees-au-dispositif-de-cee Ballard, B. (2007). Designing the mobile user experience (1st ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470060575 Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005 Barban, P., De Nazelle, A., Chatelin, S., Quirion, P., & Jean, K. (2022). Assessing the health benefits of physical activity due to active commuting in a French energy transition scenario. International Journal of Public Health, 67, 1605012. https://doi.org/10.3389/ijph.2022.1605012 Barreto, L., Amaral, A., & Baltazar, S. (2018). Urban mobility digitalization: Towards mobility as a service (MaaS). International Conference on Intelligent Systems (IS), 2018, 850–855. https://doi.org/10.1109/IS.2018.8710457 Becker, H., Balac, M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2020). Assessing the welfare impacts of shared mobility and mobility as a service (MaaS). Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.027 Benzaghta, M. A., Elwalda, A., Mousa, M., Erkan, I., & Rahman, M. (2021). SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review. Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.1.1148 Biehl, A., & Stathopoulos, A. (2020). Investigating the interconnectedness of active transportation and public transit usage as a primer for Mobility-as-a-Service adoption and deployment. J Transport Health, 18, 100897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2020.100897 Blair-Early, A., & Zender, M. (2008). User interface design principles for interaction design. Design Issues, 24(3), 85–107. Bocken, N., Short, S., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2013). A value mapping tool for sustainable business modelling. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 13(5), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2013-0078 Boglietti, S., Barabino, B., & Maternini, G. (2021). Survey on e-powered micro personal mobility vehicles: Exploring current issues towards future developments. Sustainability, 13(7), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073692 Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge Studies in Social and Cultural Anthropology) (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 Brög, W., Erl, E., & Mense, N. (2002). Individualised marketing changing travel behaviour for a better environment. 21. http://www.epomm.eu/newsletter/v2/content/2015/1115/doc/IndiMark.pdf Bruxelles Mobilité, C. T. (2020). Plan régional de mobilité 2020–2030 Plan stratégique et opérationnel (Good Moove, p. 287). Service Public Régional de Bruxelles. www.mobilite-mobiliteit.brussels Buttet, N. (2021). Comprendre la marchabilité: Comment évaluer la place du piéton dans les espaces publics? (Espace public et piétons, p. 16). CEREMA. Carvalho de Sousa, G., & Castañeda-Ayarza, J. A. (2022). PESTEL analysis and the macro-environmental factors that influence the development of the electric and hybrid vehicles industry in Brazil. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 10(1), 686–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.030 CEREMA. (2022). Cartographie du MaaS. L’Observatoire du MaaS. https://smart-city.cerema.fr/maas Cervero, R., & Radisch, C. (1996). Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile-oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy, 3(3), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070X(96)00016-9 Chassignet, M. (2021). Mobilité vers les commerces de centre-ville: 5 enseignements issus d’une enquête menée à Lille. [Blog online] Pour une mobilité durable et solidaire: le blog de Mathieu Chassignet. Alternatives économiques. Consulted at https://blogs.alternatives-economiques.fr/chassignet/2021/12/16/mobilite-vers-les-commerces-de-centre-ville-5-enseignements-issus-d-une-enquete-menee-a-lille Citymapper. (n.d.). Introducing Ads & changes to CLUB. Citymapper. https://citymapper.com/news/2532/introducing-ads-and-changes-to-club Commissariat général au développement durable. (2021). Les émissions de gaz à effet de serre du secteur des transports [Gov]. notre-environnement.gouv.fr. https://www.notre-environnement.gouv.fr/themes/climat/les-emissions-de-gaz-a-effet-de-serre-et-l-empreinte-carbone-ressources/article/les-emissions-de-gaz-a-effet-de-serre-du-secteur-des-transports?type-liaison=les-indispensables Companies House Gov.UK. (S.D.). Citymapper Limited Overview. GOV.UK Find and Update Company Information. Consulted 26 October 2022, at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/07370388 Cottrill, C. D. (2020). MaaS surveillance: Privacy considerations in mobility as a service. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.026 Courel, J., & Deguitre, L. (2020). Les déterminants du choix modal: Synthèse des connaissances scientifiques. L’Institut Paris Région. de Bruijn, G.-J., Kremers, S. P. J., Singh, A., van den Putte, B., & van Mechelen, W. (2009). Adult active transportation. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(3), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.10.019 Docherty, I., Marsden, G., & Anable, J. (2018). The governance of smart mobility. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 115, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.09.012 Elkington, J. (2004). In Henriques, A., & Richardson, J. (Eds.). (2004). The triple bottom line: Does it all add up (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849773348 Esztergár-Kiss, D., Shulha, Y., Aba, A., & Tettamanti, T. (2021). Promoting sustainable mode choice for commuting supported by persuasive strategies. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103264 Gabrielli, S., Forbes, P., Jylhä, A., Wells, S., Sirén, M., Hemminki, S., Nurmi, P., Maimone, R., Masthoff, J., & Jacucci, G. (2014). Design challenges in motivating change for sustainable urban mobility. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 416–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.026 Giles-Corti, B., Broomhall, M. H., Knuiman, M., Collins, C., Douglas, K., Ng, K., Lange, A., & Donovan, R. J. (2005). Increasing walking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.018 Goehlich, V., Fournier, G., & Richter, A. (2021). What can we learn from digitalisation and servitisation to shape a new mobility paradigm? International Journal of Business and Globalisation, 11, 296–306. Hahm, Y., Yoon, H., Jung, D., & Kwon, H. (2017). Do built environments affect pedestrians’ choices of walking routes in retail districts? A study with GPS experiments in Hongdae retail district in Seoul, South Korea. Habitat International, 70, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.10.002 Heikkilä, S. (2014). Mobility as a service—A proposal for action for the public administration case Helsinki [Master thesis]. Aalto University. Hillnhütter, H. (2016). Pedestrian Access to Public Transport [Ph.D. Thesis]. University of Stavanger. Hillnhütter, H. (2019). Traveling by public transport in cities—How much walking is involved. WALK21. Rotterdam. http://walk21.cedeus.cl/conference/1714 Hirschhorn, F., Paulsson, A., Sørensen, C. H., & Veeneman, W. (2019). Public transport regimes and mobility as a service: Governance approaches in Amsterdam, Birmingham, and Helsinki. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 130, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.016 IDFM. (2020). Le Plan de déplacements urbains d’Île-de-France [Gov]. Île-de-France Mobilités. https://www.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/le-plan-de-deplacements-urbains-d-ile-de-france IDFM. (2021). Ile-de-France Mobilités (Aa2/P-1): Organising Authority for Public Transport and Sustainable Mobility in Ile-de-France. Présentation Investisseurs, France. https://www.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/medias/portail-idfm/ae515f43-d0dc-475f-ba49-005e42b7a4bd_presentation_investisseur_2021.pdf IDFM, OMNIL, & DRIEA. (2019). La nouvelle enquête globale transport: Premiers résultats 2018. IDFM, OMNIL, DRIEA. https://www.omnil.fr/IMG/pdf/presentation_egt_v_publique_vf.pdf INSEE. (2019). Enquête Mobilité des Personnes 2019. Institut National de la Statistique et des Études Économiques. https://www.statistiques.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/resultats-detailles-de-lenquete-mobilite-des-personnes-de-2019 Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A.-M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., González, M. J. A., & Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v2i2.931 Jylhä, A., Nurmi, P., Sirén, M., Hemminki, S., & Jacucci, G. (2013). MatkaHupi: A persuasive mobile application for sustainable mobility. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing adjunct publication (pp. 227–230). https://doi.org/10.1145/2494091.2494164 Kamargianni, M., Li, W., Matyas, M., & Schäfer, A. (2016). A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 14, 3294–3303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277 Kelly, P., Williamson, C., Niven, A. G., Hunter, R., Mutrie, N., & Richards, J. (2018). Walking on sunshine: Scoping review of the evidence for walking and mental health. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 52(12), 800–806. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-098827 Kirtland, K. A., Porter, D. E., Addy, C. L., Neet, M. J., Williams, J. E., Sharpe, P. A., Neff, L. J., Kimsey, C. D., & Ainsworth, B. E. (2003). Environmental measures of physical activity supports. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(4), 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00021-7 Lah, O., Fulton, L., & Arioli, M. (2019). Decarbonization scenarios for transport and the role of urban mobility. In Sustainable urban mobility pathways (pp. 65–80). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814897-6.00003-X Lajas, R., & Macário, R. (2020). Public policy framework supporting “mobility-as-a-service” implementation. Research in Transportation Economics, 83, 100905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100905 Lecomte, C. (2019). Se déplacer au quotidien Enjeux spatiaux, enjeux sociaux. Fiche d’analyse de l’Observatoire des territoires 2019 (p. 40). Observatoire des territoires. https://www.observatoire-des-territoires.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/2020-03/fiche_analyse_mobilites_quotidiennes.pdf Liimatainen, H., & Mladenović, M. N. (2021). Developing mobility as a service—User, operator, and governance perspectives. European Transport Research Review, 13(1), 37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00496-0 Litman, T. (2010). Quantifying the benefits of nonmotorized transportation for achieving mobility management objectives (p. 40). Victoria Transport Policy Institute. www.vtpi.org Litman, T. (2003). Economic value of walkability. Transportation Research Record, 1828(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.3141/1828-01 LOI n° 2021-1104 portant lutte contre le dérèglement climatique et renforcement de la résilience face à ses effets (2021). Articles 109 et 122. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/download/pdf?id=x7Gc7Ys-Z3hzgxO5KgI0zSu1fmt64dDetDQxhvJZNMc= LOI n° 2019-1428 d'orientation des mobilités (2019). Article L-1111-4. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/download/pdf?id=dFFucSM4dRWHkEQLMHygb--nam6aCtsgM2LdqywZyGE= Lynch, P. & Horton, S. (2016). Web Style Guide, 4th Edition: Foundations of user experience design. Yale University Press. 345 p. Lyons, G. (2020). Walking as a service—Does it have legs? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 137, 271–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.05.015 Lyons, G., Cain, S., & Jakeman, K. (2021). Combo travel: Active and motorised modes working better together (p. 27). Innovate UK. Maas, B. (2022). Literature review of mobility as a service. Sustainability, 14(14), 8962. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148962 Manley, S. (2011). Chapter 17. Creating an accessible public realm. In K. H. Smith & W. F. E. Preiser (Éds.), Universal design handbook (2nd ed, p. 17.5-17.12). McGraw-Hill. Markvica, K., Millonig, A., Haufe, N., & Leodolter, M. (2020). Promoting active mobility behavior by addressing information target groups: The case of Austria. J Transport Geogr, 83, 102664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102664 McQuire, S. (2019). One map to rule them all? Google Maps as digital technical object. Communication and the Public, 4(2), 150–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057047319850192 Monnet J. (2019). Marcher en ville: Technique, technologie et infrastructure (s)low tech? Urbanités. No. 12. La ville (s)low tech. Octobre 2019, en ligne. Moore, J. F. (2005). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The Antitrust Bulletin, Fall. 58 p. Mueller, N., Rojas-Rueda, D., Cole-Hunter, T., de Nazelle, A., Dons, E., Gerike, R., Götschi, T., Int Panis, L., Kahlmeier, S., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015). Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 76, 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.04.010 Mukhtar-Landgren, D., & Smith, G. (2019). Perceived action spaces for public actors in the development of mobility as a service. European Transport Research Review, 11(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0363-7 Mulley, C. (2017). Mobility as a Services (MaaS)—Does it have critical mass? Transport Reviews, 37(3), 247–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2017.1280932 Murati, E. (2020). Mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) digital marketplace impact on EU passengers’ rights. European Transport Research Review, 12(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-020-00447-1 Nogier, J. F. (2020). UX Design et ergonomie des interfaces (7e éd.). Dunod, Malakoff. 395 p. Okunogbe, A., Nugent, R., Spencer, G., Ralston, J., & Wilding, J. (2021). Economic impacts of overweight and obesity: Current and future estimates for eight countries. BMJ Global Health, 6(10), e006351. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006351 Pangbourne, K., Bennett, S., & Baker, A. (2020). Persuasion profiles to promote pedestrianism: Effective targeting of active travel messages. Travel Behaviour and Society, 20, 300–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.004 Pangbourne, K., Mladenović, M. N., Stead, D., & Milakis, D. (2020). Questioning mobility as a service: Unanticipated implications for society and governance. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 131, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.033 RATP (2021) Rapport financière et RSE 2020. Group RATP. 198 pages. Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council, establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) 30 June 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32021R1119 Reyes Madrigal, L. M. R. (2020). Mobility as a service (MaaS): Configurations de gouvernance comme éléments de consolidation ou fragilisation des services de transport public [Master’s thesis]. Université Gustave Eiffel. Reyes Madrigal, L. M. R., Nicolaï, I., Puchinger, J., Paris-Saclay, U., & Boutueil, V. (2021). The place of walking in Mobility as a Service: Appraisal of active modes for sustainable MaaS solutions. In European Transport Conference 2021, Online. https://hal.science/hal-03341177 Reyes Madrigal, L. M. R. (2022). Walking in Mobility as a service (MaaS): Exploring the Appraisal of Walking in MaaS in the Paris Region [Poster]. In WALK21 Conference, Dublin, Ireland. https://hal.science/hal-03793787 Roussel, J. (2016). Le confort de la marche dans l’espace public parisien: Représentations, pratiques, enjeux. Université Paris-Est. Rupprecht consult. (2019). Guidelines for developing and implementing a sustainable mobility plan (Second edition; European Platform on Sustainable Urban Moblity Plans, p. 165). European Union. https://www.eltis.org/sites/default/files/sump_guidelines_2019_interactive_document_1.pdf Sarasini, S., Sochor, J., & Arby, H. (2017). What characterises a sustainable MaaS business model? 15. Sheller, M. (2011). Chapter 14. Sustainable mobility and mobility justice: Towards a twin transition. In M. Grieco & J. Urry (Eds.), Mobilities: New perspectives on transport and society (pp. 289–304). Ashgate. Sheller, M. (2018). Theorising mobility justice. Tempo Social, 30(2), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2018.142763 Smith, G., Sochor, J., & Karlsson, I. C. M. (2019). Public–private innovation: Barriers in the case of mobility as a service in West Sweden. Public Management Review, 21(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1462399 Sochor, J. (2021). Piecing together the puzzle: Mobility as a service from the user and service design perspectives. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, No. 2021/08, OECD Publishing. Sochor, J., Arby, H., Karlsson, I. C. M., & Sarasini, S. (2018). A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: A proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 27, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.12.003 Story, M. F. (2011). Chapter 4. The principles of universal design. In K. H. Smith & W. F. E. Preiser (Éds.), Universal design handbook (2nd ed, p. 4.3-4.12). McGraw-Hill. Utriainen, R., & Pöllänen, M. (2018). Review on mobility as a service in scientific publications. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 27, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.10.005 Vaddadi, B., Zhao, X., Susilo, Y., & Pernestål, A. (2020). Measuring system-level impacts of corporate mobility as a service (CMaaS) based on empirical evidence. Sustainability, 12(17), 7051. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177051 Ville de Paris. (2021). Trois opérateurs de trottinettes autorisés à déployer leur flotte dans Paris. https://www.paris.fr/pages/trois-operateurs-de-trottinettes-autorises-a-deployer-leur-flotte-dans-paris-8113 Ville de Paris. (2023). Trottinettes en libre-service : les Parisiens décideront le 2 avril. https://www.paris.fr/pages/interdiction-des-trottinettes-en-libre-service-les-parisiens-voteront-22954 Verduzco Torres, J. R., Hong, J., & McArthur, D. P. (2022). How do psychological, habitual, and built environment factors influence cycling in a city with a well-connected cycling infrastructure? International Journal of Urban Sciences, 26(3), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2021.1930111 Wang, W., Gan, H., Wang, X., Lu, H., & Huang, Y. (2022). Initiatives and challenges in using gamification in transportation: A systematic mapping. European Transport Research Review, 14(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-022-00567-w Woo, S. E., O’Boyle, E. H., & Spector, P. E. (2017). Best practices in developing, conducting, and evaluating inductive research. Human Resource Management Review, 27(2), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.004 van den Hurk, M., Pelzer, P., & Riemens, R. (2021). Governance challenges of mobility platforms: The case of Merwede, Utrecht. European Transport Research Review, 13(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-021-00483-5 World Health Organization (WHO). (2021). Obesity and overweight. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE. Yüksel, I. (2012). Developing a multi-criteria decision-making model for PESTEL analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v7n24p52 Zalengera, C., Blanchard, R. E., Eames, P. C., Juma, A. M., Chitawo, M. L., & Gondwe, K. T. (2014). Overview of the Malawi energy situation and A PESTLE analysis for sustainable development of renewable energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 38, 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.050 Zhao, J., Baird, T., Baird, T., & Baird, T. (2014). « Nudging » Active Travel: A Framework for Behavioral Interventions Using Mobile Technology. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C. Zhao, X., Andruetto, C., Vaddadi, B., & Pernestål, A. (2021). Potential values of MaaS impacts in future scenarios. Journal of Urban Mobility, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2021.100005 Zhao, X., Reyes Madrigal, L. M. R., & Vaddadi, B. (2022). Identifying models for assessing the system-level impacts of Mobility as a Service (MaaS). 3rd ICoMaaS conference. Tampere, Finland 2023, 17.