Peak ground motion predictions in India: an appraisal for rock sites
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abrahamson NA, Litehiser JJ (1989) Attenuation of vertical peak acceleration. Bull Seismol Soc Am 79:549–580
Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:94–127
Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (2008) Summary of the Abrahamson & Silva NGA ground motion relations. Earthq Spectra 24:67–97
Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2007a) Prediction of elastic displacement response spectra in Europe and the Middle East. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 36:1275–1301
Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2007b) Empirical prediction equations for peak ground velocity derived from strong-motion records from Europe and the Middle East. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:511–530
Akkar S, Bommer JJ (2010) Empirical equations for the prediction of PGA, PGV, and spectral accelerations in Europe, the Mediterranean region, and the Middle East. Seismol Res Lett 81:195–206
Algermissen ST, Perkins DM (1976) A probabilistic estimate of maximum acceleration in rock in the contiguous United States, U.S. Geol. Surv. Open-file Rep. 76–416, 45
Allen TI, Wald DJ (2009) Evaluation of ground-motion modeling techniques for use in Global ShakeMap—a critique of instrumental ground-motion prediction equations, peak ground-motion to macroseismic intensity conversions, and macroseismic intensity predictions in different tectonic settings: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2009–1047
Ambraseys NN, Douglas J, Sarma SK, Smit PM (2005) Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bull Earthq Engg 3:1–53
Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25:371–400
Anbazhagan P, Vinod JS, Sitharam TG (2009) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Bangalore. Nat Hazards 48:145–166
Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for Eastern North America from a referenced empirical approach: implications for epistemic uncertainty. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:1304–1318
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1995) Ground motion relations for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:17–30
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2003) Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction-zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1703–1729
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2006) Earthquake ground-motion predictions for eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:2181–2205
Atkinson GM, Boore DM (2008) Erratum to empirical ground–motion relations for subduction zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other Regions by Gail M. Atkinson and David M. Boore. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:2567–2569
Atkinson GM, Kaka SI (2007) Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:497–510
Atkinson GM, Macias M (2009) Predicted ground motions for great interface earthquakes in the Cascadia subduction zone. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:1552–1578
Atkinson GM, Sonley E (2000) Relationships between modified Mercalli intensity and response spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 90:537–544
Baker J, Jayaram N, Lin T, Schleiffarth L, Yamamoto Y (2010) Ground motion prediction model scripts. http://www.stanford.edu/∼bakerjw/attenuation.html
Balasubrahmanyan MN (2006) Geology and tectonics of India: an overview, Memoir no. 9, International Association for Gondwana Research
Banghar AR (1976) Mechanism solution of Kinnaur (Himachal Pradesh, India) earthquake of January 19, 1975. Tectonophysics 31:T5–T11
Baruah S, Gogoi NK, Erteleva O, Aptikaev F, Kayal JR (2009) Ground motion parameters of Shillong plateau: one of the most seismically active zones of northeastern India. Earthq Sci 22:283–291
Ben-Menahem A, Aboodi E, Schild R (1974) The source of the great Assam earthquake-an intraplate wedge motion. Phys Earth Planet Inter 9:265–289
Beyer K, Bommer JJ (2006) Relationships between median values and between aleatory variability for different definitions of the horizontal component of motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1512–1522
Bhatia SC, Kumar MR, Gupta HK (1999) A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions. Ann Geofis 42:1153–1166
Bilham R (1999) Slip parameters for the Rann of Kachchh, India, 16 June 1819, earthquake, quantified from contemporary accounts. In: Stewart IS, Vita-Finzi C (eds) Coastal tectonics, vol 146. Geological Society London, pp 295–318
Bilham R (2004) Earthquakes in India and the Himalaya: tectonics, geodesy and history. Ann Geophys 47:839–858
Bodin P, Horton S (2004) Source parameters and tectonic implications of aftershocks of the MW 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake of 26 January 2001. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:818–827
Bodin P, Malagnini L, Akinci A (2004) Ground-motion scaling in the Kachchh Basin, India, deduced from aftershocks of the 2001 MW 7.6 Bhuj Earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1658–1669
Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Strasser FO (2003) Style-of-faulting in ground-motion prediction equations. Bull Earthq Engg 1:171–203
Bommer JJ, Douglas J, Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Bungum H, Fäh D (2010) On the selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis. Seismol Res Lett 81:794–801
Bommer JJ, Scherbaum F, Bungum H, Cotton F, Sabetta F, Abrahamson NA (2005) On the use of logic trees for ground-motion prediction equations in seismic-hazard analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:377–389
Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01s and 10.0s. Earthq Spectra 24:99–138
Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1993) Estimation of response spectra and peak accelerations from Western North America earthquakes. An Interim Report, Open-File-Report 93–509, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia
Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work (with 2005 erratum). Seismol Res Lett 68:128–153
Boore DM, Watson-Lamprey J, Abrahamson NA (2006) Orientation-independent measures of ground motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:1502–1511
Boyd OS, Mueller CS, Rukstales KS (2007) Preliminary probabilistic seismic hazard map for Afghanistan: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007–113
Campbell KW (2003a) Engineering models of strong ground motion. In: Chen W-P, Scawthorn C (eds) Earthquake engineering handbook, Chapter 5. CRC, New York
Campbell KW (2003b) Prediction of strong ground motion using the hybrid empirical method and its use in the development of ground-motion (attenuation) relations in Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1012–1033
Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2003) Updated near-source ground motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:314–331 (including Erratum)
Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2006) Next generation attenuation (NGA) empirical ground motion models: can they be used in Europe? In: First European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology (A joint event of the 13th ECEE & 30th General Assembly of the ESC), Geneva, Switzerland, 3–8 September, Paper No. 458
Campbell KW, Bozorgnia Y (2008) NGA ground motion model for the geometric mean horizontal component of PGA, PGV, PGD and 5% damped linear elastic response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10s. Earthq Spectra 24:139–171
Chen W-P, Molnar P (1990) Source parameters of earthquakes and intraplate deformation beneath the Shillong Plateau and northern Indoburman ranges. J Geophys Res 95:12527–12552
Chiou B, Youngs RR (2008) An NGA model for the average horizontal component of peak ground motion and response spectra. Earthq Spectra 24:173–215
Chung WY, Gao H (1995) Source parameters of the Anjar earthquake of July 21, 1956, India, and its seismotectonic implications for the Kutch rift basin. Tectonophysics 242:281–292
Cotton F, Scherbaum F, Bommer JJ, Bungum H (2006) Criteria for selecting and adjusting ground-motion models for specific target regions: application to Central Europe and rock sites. J Seismol 10:137–156
Cramer C, Kumar A (2003) 2001 Bhuj, India, earthquake engineering seismoscope recordings and eastern North America ground-motion attenuation relations. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1390–1394
Dahle A, Bungum H, Kvamme LB (1990) Attenuation models inferred from intraplate earthquake recordings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 19:1125–1141
Dahle A, Bungum H, Kvamme LB (1991) Empirically derived PSV spectral attenuation models for intraplate conditions. Eur Earthq Eng 3:42–52
Das S, Gupta ID, Gupta VK (2006) A probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of northeast India. Earthq Spectra 22:1–27
Dasgupta S, Pande P, Ganguly D, Iqbal Z, Sanyal K, Venaktraman NV, Dasgupta S, Sural B, Harendranath L, Mazumadar K, Sanyal S, Roy A, Das LK, Misra PS, Gupta H (2000) Seismotectonic atlas of India and its environs. Geological Survey, Calcutta
Delavaud E, Scherbaum F, Kuehn N, Riggelsen C (2009) Information-theoretic selection of ground-motion prediction equations for seismic hazard analysis: an applicability study using Californian data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3248–3263
Douglas J (2003) Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: a review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth Sci Rev 61:41–104
Douglas J (2004) Ground motion estimation equations 1964–2003: reissue of ESEE Report No. 01–1: ‘A comprehensive worldwide summary of strong-motion attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and spectral ordinates (1969–2000)’ with corrections and additions. Technical Reports 04–001-SM, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK. http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/civilengineering/research/researchnewsandreports/researchreports
Douglas J (2006) Errata of and additions to ‘Ground motion estimation equations 1964–2003’. Intermediary report RP-54603-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France. http://www.brgm.fr/publication/rechRapportSP.jsp
Douglas J (2008) Further errata of and additions to ‘Ground motion estimation equations 1964–2003’. Final report RP-56187-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France. http://www.brgm.fr/publication/rechRapportSP.jsp
Douglas J (2010) Consistency of ground-motion predictions from the past four decades. Bull Earthq Eng 8:1515–1526. doi: 10.1007/s10518-010-9195-5
Douglas J, Mohais R (2009) Comparing predicted and observed ground motions from subduction earthquakes in the Lesser Antilles. J Seismol 13:577–587
Frankel A, Mueller C, Barnhard T, Perkins D, Leyendecker E, Dickman N, Hanson S, Hopper M (1996) National seismic-hazard maps: documentation June 1996. USGS Open File Report, 96–532
Gahalaut VK, Chander R (1992) A rupture model for the great earthquake of 1897, Northeast India. Tectonophysics 204:163–174
Gregor NJ, Silva WJ, Wong IG, Youngs R (2002) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for Cascadia subduction zone mega-thrust earthquakes based on a stochastic finite-fault modeling. Bull Seismol Soc Am 92:1923–1932
Grünthal G (1998) European macroseismic scale 1998, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie Volume 15, Luxembourg
Gupta ID (2010) Response spectral attenuation relations for in-slab earthquakes in Indo-Burmese subduction zone. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 30:368–377
Hasegawa HS, Basham PW, Berry MJ (1981) Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in Canada. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:1943–1962
Hintersberger E, Scherbaum F, Hainzl S (2007) Update of likelihood-based ground-motion model selection for seismic hazard analysis in western central Europe. Bull Earthq Engg 5:1–16
Hough SE, Bilham R (2008) Site response of the Ganges basin inferred from reevaluated macroseismic observations from the 1897 Shillong, 1905 Kangra, and 1934 Nepal earthquakes. J Earth Syst Sci 117:773–782
Hwang H, Huo J-R (1997) Attenuation relations of ground motion for rock and soil sites in eastern United States. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 16:363–372
Idriss IM (2008) An NGA empirical model for estimating the horizontal spectral values generated by shallow crustal earthquakes. Earthq Spectra 24:217–242
Iyengar RN, Raghukanth STG (2004) Attenuation of strong ground motion in Peninsular India. Seismol Res Lett 79:530–540
Jain SK, Roshan AD, Arlekar JN, Basu PC (2000) Empirical attenuation relationships for the Himalayan earthquakes based on Indian strong motion data. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on seismic zonation
Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2007) Probabilistic seismic-hazard estimation for Peninsular India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:318–330
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1981) Peak horizontal acceleration and velocity from strong-motion records including records from the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 71:2011–2038
Kanagarathinam L, Dodagoudar GR, Boominathan A (2008) Probabilistic seismic hazard studies of east coast region of India. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, 12–17 October, Beijing, China
Kanno T, Narita A, Morikawa N, Fujiwara H, Fukushima Y (2006) A new attenuation relation for strong ground motion in Japan based on recorded data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:879–897
Kayal JR (2008) Microearthquake seismology and seismotectonics of south Asia, 1st edn. Springer Verlag and Capital Publishing Company, India, ISBN: 978–1–4020–8179–8
Khattri KN, Rogers AM, Perkins DM, Algermissen ST (1984) A seismic hazard map of India and adjacent areas. Tectonophysics 108:93–134
Lin PS, Lee CT (2008) Ground-motion attenuation relationships for subduction-zone earthquakes in Northeastern Taiwan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:220–240
Mahajan AK, Thakur VC, Sharma ML, Chauhan M (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard map of NW Himalaya and its adjoining area, India. Nat Hazards 53:443–457
Mai PM, Spudich P, Boatwright J (2005) Hypocenter locations in finite-source rupture models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:965–980
Mandal P, Kumar N, Sathyamurthy C, Raju IP (2009) Ground-motion attenuation relation from strong-motion records of the 2001 Mw 7.7 Bhuj earthquake sequence (2001–2006), Gujarat, India. Pageoph 166:451–469
Margottini C, Molin D, Narcisi B, Serva L (1985) Intensity vs. acceleration: Italian data. In: Proc conf hist seism central-eastern Mediterranean region, pp 213–226
Margottini C, Molin D, Serva L (1992) Intensity versus ground motion: a new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33:45–58
Martin S, Szeliga W (2010) A catalog of felt intensity data for 570 earthquakes in India from 1636 to 2009. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:562–569
Megawati K, Pan T-C (2010) Ground-motion attenuation relationship for Sumatran mega thrust earthquakes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:827–845
Megawati K, Pan T-C, Koketsu K (2005) Response spectral attenuation relationships for Sumatran-subduction earthquakes and the seismic hazard implications to Singapore and Kuala Lumpur. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 25:11–25
Menon A, Ornthammarath T, Corigliano M, Lai CG (2010) Probabilistic seismic hazard macrozonation of Tamil Nadu in Southern India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 100:1320–1341
Mona L, Khwaja AA, Jan MQ (2007) Seismic hazard assessment of the NW Himalayan fold-and-thrust belt, Pakistan, using probabilistic approach. J Earthqu Eng 11:257–301
Mucciarelli M, Albarello D, D’Amico V (2008) Comparison of probabilistic seismic hazard estimates in Italy. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:2652–2664
Nandy DR (2001) Geodynamics of North Eastern India and the adjoining region, 1st edn. ACB, Calcutta
Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS (2010) Assessment of seismic site conditions: a case study from Guwahati city, Northeast India. Pageoph. doi: 10.1007/s00024-010-0197-7
Nath SK, Raj A, Thingbaijam KKS, Kumar A (2009) Ground motion synthesis and seismic scenario in Guwahati city—a stochastic approach. Seismol Res Lett 80:233–242
Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS, Vyas JC, Sengupta P, Dev SMSP (2010a) Macroseismic-driven site effects in the southern territory of West Bengal, India. Seismol Res Lett 81:480–487
Nath SK, Thingbaijam KKS, Adhikari MD, Nayak A, Devaraj N, Ghosh SK, Mahajan AK (2010b) Seismic site classification and spectral analyses: a regional level study in India. J Soil Dyn Earthq Eng (under review)
Nath SK, Vyas M, Pal I, Sengupta P (2005) A hazard scenario in the Sikkim Himalaya from seismotectonics spectral amplification source parameterization and spectral attenuation laws using strong motion seismometry. J Geophys Res 110:B01301. doi: 10.1029/2004/2004J B003199
Peng KZ, Wu FT, Song L (1985) Attenuation characteristics of peak horizontal acceleration in northeast and southwest china. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 13:337–350
Petersen MD, Dewey J, Hartzell S, Mueller C, Harmsen S, Frankel AD, Rukstales K (2004a) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for Sumatra, Indonesia and across the Southern Malaysian Peninsula. Tectonophysics 390:141–158
Petersen MD, Rastogi BK, Schweig ES, Harmsen SC, Gomberg JS (2004b) Sensitivity analysis of seismic hazard for the northwestern portion of the state of Gujarat, India. Tectonophysics 390:105–115
Power M, Chiou B, Abrahamson N, Bozorgnia Y, Shantz T, Roblee C (2008) An overview of the NGA project. Earthq Spectra 24:3–21
Raghukanth STG, Iyengar RN (2007) Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in Peninsular India. J Earth Syst Sci 116:199–214
Sabetta F, Pugliese A (1996) Estimation of response spectra and simulation of non-stationary earthquake ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:337–352
Sabetta F, Lucantoni A, Bungum H, Bommer JJ (2005) Sensitivity of PSHA results to ground motion prediction relations and logic-tree weights. Soil Dyn Earthqu Eng 25:317–329
Sadigh K, Chang C-Y, Egan JA, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relationship for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68:180–189
Scasserra G, Stewart JP, Bazzurro P, Lanzo G, Mollaioli F (2008) A comparison of NGA ground-motion prediction equations to Italian data. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:2961–2978
Scherbaum F, Bommer JJ, Bungum H, Cotton F, Abrahamson NA (2005) Composite ground-motion models and logic trees: methodology, sensitivities, and uncertainties. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:1575–1593
Scherbaum F, Cotton F, Smit P (2004a) On the use of response spectral reference data for the selection and ranking of ground-motion models for seismic hazard analysis in regions of moderate seismicity: the case of rock motion. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1–22
Scherbaum F, Schmedes J, Cotton F (2004b) On the conversion of source-to-site distance measures for extended earthquake source models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 94:1053–1069
Scherbaum F, Delavaud E, Riggelsen C (2009) Model selection in seismic hazard analysis: an information-theoretic perspective. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:3234–3247
Sharma ML (1998) Attenuation relationship for estimation of peak ground horizontal acceleration using data from strong-motion arrays in India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:1063–1069
Sharma ML, Bungum H (2006) New strong ground motion spectral attenuation relations for the Himalayan region. In: 1st European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Switzerland, September, Paper no. 1459
Sharma ML, Malik S (2006) Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and estimation of spectral strong ground motion on bed rock in north east India. In: 4th international conference on earthquake engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, Paper No. 15
Sharma ML, Douglas J, Bungum H, Kotadia J (2009) Ground-motion prediction equations based on data from the Himalayan and Zagros Regions. J Earthqu Eng 13:1191–1210
Shoja–Taheri J, Naserieh S, Hadi G (2010) A test of the applicability of NGA models to the strong ground-motion data in the Iranian Plateau. J Earthqu Eng 14:278–292
Singh RP, Aman A, Prasad YJJ (1996) Attenuation relations for strong seismic ground motion in the Himalayan region. Pageoph 147:161–180
Singh SK, Bansal BK, Bhattacharya SN, Pacheco JF, Dattatrayam RS (2003) Estimation of ground motion for Bhuj (26 January 2001; Mw 7.6) and for future earthquakes in India. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:353–370
Singh SK, Ordaz M, Dattatrayam RS, Gupta HK (1999) A spectral analysis of the 21 May 1997, Jabalpur, India, earthquake (Mw = 5.8) and estimation of ground motion from future earthquakes in the Indian shield region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89:1620–1630
Sorensen MB, Stromeyer D, Grünthal G (2008) Estimation of macroseismic intensity—new attenuation and intensity vs. ground motion relations for different parts of Europe. In: The 14th world conference on earthquake engineering, 12–17 October, Beijing, China
Souriau A (2006) Quantifying felt events: a joint analysis of intensities, accelerations and dominant frequencies. J Seismol 10:23–38
Stafford PJ, Strasser FO, Bommer JJ (2008) An evaluation of the applicability of the NGA models to ground-motion prediction in the Euro-Mediterranean region. Bull Earthq Engg 6:149–177
Strasser FO, Abrahamson NA, Bommer JJ (2009) Sigma: issues, insights, and challenges. Seismol Res Lett 80:41–56
Strasser FO, Arango MC, Bommer JJ (2010) Scaling of the source dimensions of interface and intraslab subduction-zone earthquakes with moment magnitude. Seismol Res Lett 81:941–950
Stuart M (1926) The Srimangal earthquake of 8th July, 1918. Geol Surv India Mem 46:1–70
Tandon AN, Chaudhury HM (1968) Koyna earthquake of December 1967. Sci Rep, India Meteorological Department, 59
Tavakoli B, Pezeshk S (2005) Empirical-stochastic ground-motion prediction for Eastern North America. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95:2283–2296
Thingbaijam KKS, Nath SK (2010) A seismogenic source framework for Indian subcontinent. Bull Seismol Soc Am (revised version under review)
Toro GR (2002) Modification of the Toro et al. (1997) attenuation equations for large magnitudes and short distances. Risk Engineering, Boulder
Toro GR, Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF (1997) Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:41–57
Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton TH, Kanamori H (1999) Relationship between peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and modified Mercalli intensity for earthquakes in California. Earthq Spectra 15:557–564
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ (1994) New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Assoc Am 84:974–1002
Youngs RR, Chiou S-J, Silva WJ, Humphrey JR (1997) Strong ground motion relationships for subduction earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68:58–73