Patients with Fibromyalgia Display Less Functional Connectivity in the Brain's Pain Inhibitory Network

Molecular Pain - Tập 8 - Trang 1744-8069-8-32 - 2012
Karin Jensen1,2, Rita Loitoile1,2, Eva Kosek3, Frank Petzke4, Serena Carville5, Peter Fransson3, Hanke Marcus6, Steven Williams7, Ernest Choy8, Yves Mainguy9, Olivier Vitton9, Richard H. Gracely10, Randy L. Gollub1,2, Martin Ingvar3, Jian Kong1,2
1Athinoula A. Martinos Center For Biomedical Imaging, Boston, USA
2Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
3Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
4Pain clinic, Centre for Anesthesiology, Emergency and Intensive care Medicine, University Medical Centre, Göttingen, Germany
5UK Age Research Forum, London, UK
6Department of Anesthesiology and Postoperative Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
7Centre for Neuroimaging Science, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
8Department of Medicine, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
9Pierre Fabre Médicament, Labège, France
10Center for Neurosensory Disorders, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA

Tóm tắt

Background:

There is evidence for augmented processing of pain and impaired endogenous pain inhibition in Fibromyalgia syndrome (FM). In order to fully understand the mechanisms involved in FM pathology, there is a need for closer investigation of endogenous pain modulation. In the present study, we compared the functional connectivity of the descending pain inhibitory network in age-matched FM patients and healthy controls (HC). We performed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in 42 subjects; 14 healthy and 28 age-matched FM patients (2 patients per HC), during randomly presented, subjectively calibrated pressure pain stimuli. A seed-based functional connectivity analysis of brain activity was performed. The seed coordinates were based on the findings from our previous study, comparing the fMRI signal during calibrated pressure pain in FM and HC: the rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) and thalamus.

Results:

FM patients required significantly less pressure (kPa) to reach calibrated pain at 50 mm on a 0–100 visual analogue scale ( p<.001, two-tailed). During fMRI scanning, the rACC displayed significantly higher connectivity to the amygdala, hippocampus, and brainstem in healthy controls, compared to FM patients. There were no regions where FM patients showed higher rACC connectivity. Thalamus showed significantly higher connectivity to the orbitofrontal cortex in healthy controls but no regions showed higher thalamic connectivity in FM patients.

Conclusion:

Patients with FM displayed less connectivity within the brain's pain inhibitory network during calibrated pressure pain, compared to healthy controls. The present study provides brain-imaging evidence on how brain regions involved in homeostatic control of pain are less connected in FM patients. It is possible that the dysfunction of the descending pain modulatory network plays an important role in maintenance of FM pain and our results may translate into clinical implications by using the functional connectivity of the pain modulatory network as an objective measure of pain dysregulation.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/art.1780380104

10.1002/art.1780330203

10.1300/J094v02n02_06

10.2105/AJPH.74.6.574

Robinson RL, 2003, Journal of Rheumatology, 30, 1318

10.1002/art.1780400904

Burckhardt CS, 1995, J Musculoskeletal pain, 3, 71, 10.1300/J094v03n04_08

Cook DB, 2004, The Journal of Rheumatology, 31, 364

10.1002/art.10225

10.1002/art.27497

10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181a32da0

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0098-07.2007

10.1016/j.pain.2007.05.010

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2849-07.2007

Harrison MJ, 2008, J Rheumatol, 35, 592

10.1002/art.24849

10.1002/art.33339

10.1097/00002508-199709000-00003

10.1054/jpai.2001.25533

10.1016/j.pain.2004.12.032

10.1016/S0304-3959(96)03295-2

10.1016/j.pain.2009.03.018

10.1002/1529-0131(200012)43:12<2823::AID-ANR24>3.0.CO;2-E

10.1002/art.1780380708

10.1002/hbm.20705

10.1016/j.pain.2009.11.008

10.1016/j.bbr.2010.03.042

10.1186/1471-2202-10-138

10.1371/journal.pone.0004542

10.1002/art.27649

10.1002/art.21008

10.1016/j.ejpain.2004.09.001

Burckhardt C, 1991, J Rheumatol, 18, 728

10.1073/pnas.0504136102

10.1152/jn.00048.2006

10.1038/nrn1431

10.1002/ana.410040511

10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00428.x

10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.028

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-09896.2001

10.1016/j.pain.2010.03.011

10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.023

10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.009

10.1152/jn.00249.2005

10.1038/nrn1704

10.1515/REVNEURO.2007.18.3-4.173

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1812-08.2008

10.1016/j.pain.2011.03.002

10.1016/j.pain.2005.08.027

10.1126/science.1067176

Foltz EL, 1968, Int J Neurol, 6, 353

10.3171/jns.1962.19.2.0089

10.1097/00004691-200011000-00005

Melzack R, The skin senses, 423

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2944-08.2008

10.1126/science.1060952

10.1016/0304-3959(95)00048-W

10.1016/0304-3959(95)00015-K

10.1038/nrn1747

10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.006

10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5791-10.2011

10.1126/science.1093065

10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198565741.003.0012

10.1016/S0166-2236(03)00123-1

10.2967/jnumed.108.053264