Paternalism<i>v</i>. autonomy – are we barking up the wrong tree?

British Journal of Psychiatry - Tập 209 Số 2 - Trang 95-96 - 2016
Peter Lepping1, Tom Palmstierna2, Bevinahalli Nanjegowda Raveesh3
1Wrexham Community Mental Health Team, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Ty Derbyn, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, Centre for Mental Health and Society, Bangor University, and Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, India
2Forensic Psychiatric Outpatient Unit, Stockholm Addiction Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, and Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
3Dharwad Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, India

Tóm tắt

SummaryWe explore whether we can reduce paternalism by increasing patient autonomy. We argue that autonomy should not have any automatic priority over other ethical values. Thus, balancing autonomyv.other ethical pillars and finding the optimal balance between the patient's wishes and those of other relevant stakeholders such as the patient's family has to be dynamic over time.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Fritzsche, 2014, The Doctor–Patient Relationship in Psychosomatic Medicine.

Beauchamp, 2001, Principles of Biomedical Ethics

10.1192/bjp.188.1.7

10.1186/1747-5341-4-7

10.1097/YCO.0b013e328356b7ed

10.1192/bjp.bp.113.129833

Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board (Scotland) [2015] UKSC 11.

Shah, 2010, Coercion in psychiatric care: global and Indian perspective, Indian J Psychiatry, 52

Lepping, 2015, Systematic review of the prevalence of lack of capacity in medical and psychiatric settings, Clin Med, 15, 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-4-337

P (by his litigation friend the Official Solicitor) (Appellant) v Cheshire West and Chester Council and another (Respondents), P and Q (by their litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) (Appellants) v Surrey County Council (Respondent) [2014] UKSC 19; On appeal from: [2011] EWCA Civ 1257; [2011] EWCA Civ 190.