Passive mechanical properties and structure of the aorta: segmental analysis

Acta Physiologica - Tập 190 Số 4 - Trang 277-289 - 2007
Dimitrios P. Sokolis1
1Laboratory of Biomechanics, Foundation of Biomedical Research, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece

Tóm tắt

Abstract

Aim:  This study assessed segmental changes in the mechanical properties of the aorta at low, physiologic and high stresses, in relation with wall composition and morphometry.

Methods:  The aorta of 10 healthy pigs was divided into six thoracic and three abdominal segments. Aortic specimens were mechanically tested to failure, i.e. rupture, using a uniaxial tension device. Elastic modulus–stress curves were obtained for low (part I), physiologic (part II) and high (part III) stresses, and submitted to regression analysis; failure parameters were calculated. Histological evaluation was performed using an image‐processing system, with quantification of morphometric parameters and composition of the entire vessel and its layers, i.e. media and adventitia.

Results:  Significant differences were found in the regression parameters of parts I, II and III, and in failure parameters, suggesting that the proximal segments were stiffer at low stresses, whereas the distal were less extensible, stronger and stiffer at physiologic and high stresses. Image analysis demonstrated significant differences in morphometry and composition among the different layers and segments of the aorta, with higher elastin content proximally and collagen content distally. Good correlations were found between the regression parameters of parts I and II and elastin content, and between the failure and regression parameters of parts II and III and collagen content.

Conclusion:  Segmental changes exist in the structure and mechanical properties of the aorta, depending on the level of aortic pressure. This information is necessary for understanding aortic function at general non‐physiologic stress states.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S1010-7940(00)00382-1

Anliker M., 1972, Biomechanics: Its Foundations and Objectives, 337

10.1161/01.RES.19.1.104

10.2170/jjphysiol.21.27

10.1113/jphysiol.1961.sp006687

10.1093/cvr/10.4.437

10.1093/cvr/9.5.669

Boudoulas H., 1996, Functional Abnormalities of the Aorta, 3

Boudoulas H., 2001, Hurst's the Heart, 995

10.1161/01.ATV.5.1.19

10.1016/0022-4804(72)90083-2

10.1152/ajpheart.1978.234.5.H533

10.1152/physrev.1978.58.2.397

Dobrin P.B., 1984, Elastase, collagenase, and the biaxial elastic properties of dog carotid artery, Am J Physiol, 237, H124

10.1001/jama.290.21.2803

10.1161/01.RES.19.2.394

10.3233/BIR-1973-10208

10.1007/978-1-4757-2257-4_8

10.1515/bmte.1991.36.4.86

10.1038/199606a0

10.1152/ajpheart.00567.2003

10.1098/rspb.1957.0029

10.1159/000094530

10.1115/1.2895528

10.1016/0021-9290(81)90024-5

10.1114/1.1492812

10.1152/ajpheart.00934.2004

10.1007/978-0-387-21576-1_3

10.1016/0021-9290(84)90034-4

10.1161/01.CIR.72.6.1257

10.1161/01.RES.18.3.278

Mattox K.L., 1998, Traumatic rupture of the thoracic aorta, Adv Card Surg, 10, 271

10.1152/jappl.1968.24.1.73

Milnor W.R., 1989, Hemodynamics, 58

10.1016/0021-9290(82)90055-0

10.1016/0021-9290(83)90044-1

Nichols W.W., 2005, McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries. Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles

10.1016/0021-9290(83)90058-1

Roach M.R., 1957, The reason for the shape of the distensibility curves of arteries, Can J Biochem, 35, 681

10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01504-2

10.1139/y81-160

10.1107/S0909049505012549

10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00073-8

10.1046/j.1439-0264.2002.00356.x

10.1007/s10439-005-7118-4

10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.003

10.1016/0021-9290(74)90031-1

Taylor M.G., 1965, Pulsatile Blood Flow, 343

10.1016/S0959-8049(96)00244-4

10.1152/ajpheart.00620.2000