Partial rootzone drying and deficit irrigation increase stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit in anisohydric grapevines

Functional Plant Biology - Tập 37 Số 2 - Trang 128 - 2010
Marisa Collins1,2, Sigfredo Fuentes3, E.W.R. Barlow1
1Melbourne School of Land and Environment, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
2Present address: CSIRO Plant Industry, PO Box 350, Glen Osmond, SA 5064, Australia.
3Centre for Plant and Food Science, University of Western Sydney, Hawkesbury Campus, Richmond, NSW 2753, Australia,

Tóm tắt

The aim of this study was to investigate how alternative irrigation strategies affected grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) stomatal response to atmospheric vapour pressure deficit (VPD). In two sites, application of partial rootzone drying (PRD) at 90–100% of crop evapotranspiration (ETc) increased stomatal sensitivity of Shiraz (Syrah) grapevines to high VPD compared with control vines irrigated with the same amount of water but applied on both sides of the vine. PRD significantly reduced vine water use (ESF) measured as sap flow and in dry conditions increased the depth of water uptake from the soil profile. In both experiments, PRD reduced vine water use by up to 50% at moderate VPD (~3 kPa) compared with control vines irrigated at the same level. In the same vines, the response to PRD applied at 100% ETc and deficit irrigation applied at 65% ETc was the same, increasing stomatal sensitivity to VPD and decreasing sap flow. Hydraulic signalling apparently did not play a role in changing stomatal sensitivity as there was no difference in stem water potentials between any of the treatment (PRD and DI) and control vines. This suggests that a long distance root-based chemical signal such as ABA may be responsible for the changes in stomatal behaviour. Shiraz grapevines have previously been classified as anisohydric-like, but application of PRD and DI increased stomatal closure in response to conditions of high evaporative demand making the vines behave in a more isohydric-like manner.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Antol�n, 2008, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 14, 123, 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2008.00014.x

Buckley, 2005, New Phytologist, 168, 275, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01543.x

Bunce, 1985, Plant, Cell & Environment, 8, 55, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1985.tb01209.x

Davies, 2002, New Phytologist, 153, 449, 10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001.00345.x

de Souza, 2003, Functional Plant Biology, 30, 653, 10.1071/FP02115

de Souza, 2005, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, 106, 261, 10.1016/j.agee.2004.10.014

de Souza, 2005, Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 2163, 10.1093/jxb/eri216

Dodd, 2009, Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 2454, 10.1093/jxb/erp192

Dodd, 2006, Functional Plant Biology, 33, 1081, 10.1071/FP06203

Dodd, 2008, Plant, Cell & Environment, 31, 1263, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01831.x

dos Santos, 2003, Functional Plant Biology, 30, 663, 10.1071/FP02180

dos Santos, 2005, Vitis, 44, 117

dos Santos, 2007, Scientia Horticulturae, 112, 321, 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.01.006

Dry, 1999, Vitis, 38, 151

Dry, 2000, Vitis, 39, 9

Eamus, 2008, Plant, Cell & Environment, 31, 269, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01771.x

Edwards, 1984, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 27, 537, 10.1080/00288233.1984.10418016

Ginestar, 1998, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 49, 413, 10.5344/ajev.1998.49.4.413

Gong, 2005, Hydrological Processes, 19, 2575, 10.1002/hyp.5732

Green, 1988, Journal of Experimental Botany, 39, 115, 10.1093/jxb/39.1.115

Green, 2003, Agronomy Journal, 95, 1371, 10.2134/agronj2003.1371

Gu, 2004, The Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 79, 26, 10.1080/14620316.2004.11511732

Heilman, 1996, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 81, 79, 10.1016/0168-1923(95)02312-7

Intrigliolo, 2009, Agricultural Water Management, 96, 282, 10.1016/j.agwat.2008.08.001

Kang, 2003, Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 280, 192, 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00226-9

Loveys, 2000, Acta Horticulturae, 537, 187, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2000.537.19

Marshall, 1958, Plant Physiology, 33, 385, 10.1104/pp.33.6.385

Monteith, 1995, Plant, Cell & Environment, 18, 357, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00371.x

Mott, 1991, Plant, Cell & Environment, 14, 509, 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01521.x

Olivo, 2009, Irrigation Science, 27, 175, 10.1007/s00271-008-0134-z

Poni, 2005, Acta Horticulturae, 689, 277, 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.689.32

Poni, 2007, Scientia Horticulturae, 114, 96, 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.06.003

Rodrigues, 2008, Functional Plant Biology, 35, 565, 10.1071/FP08004

Sadras, 2009, Irrigation Science, 27, 183, 10.1007/s00271-008-0141-0

Schultz, 2003, Plant, Cell & Environment, 26, 1393, 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01064.x

Soar, 2006, Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research, 12, 2, 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2006.tb00038.x

Steudle, 2000, Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 1531, 10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1531

Stoll, 2000, Australian & New Zealand Wine Industry Journal, 15, 74

Stoll, 2000, Journal of Experimental Botany, 51, 1627, 10.1093/jexbot/51.350.1627

Swanson, 1981, Journal of Experimental Botany, 32, 221, 10.1093/jxb/32.1.221

Tardieu, 1992, Plant Physiology, 98, 540, 10.1104/pp.98.2.540

Tardieu, 1998, Journal of Experimental Botany, 49, 419, 10.1093/jxb/49.Special_Issue.419

Vandeleur, 2009, Plant Physiology, 149, 445, 10.1104/pp.108.128645

Wilkinson, 2002, Plant, Cell & Environment, 25, 195, 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00824.x

Williams, 2002, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 127, 448, 10.21273/JASHS.127.3.448

Xie, 2006, Current Biology, 16, 882, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.028