Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention

Atkinson, 1972, Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 96, 124, 10.1037/h0033475

Begg, 1992, Memory monitoring – how useful is self-knowledge about memory?, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4, 195, 10.1080/09541449208406182

Benjamin, 2007, Memory is more than just remembering: Strategic control of encoding, accessing memory, and making decisions, Vol 48, 175

Bisanz, 1978, Knowledge of ones own responding and relation of such knowledge to learning, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 25, 116, 10.1016/0022-0965(78)90042-5

Bjorklund, 2009, The benefits of youth, European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 120, 10.1080/17405620802602334

Boekaerts, 1997, Self-regulated learning: a new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students, Learning and Instruction, 2, 161, 10.1016/S0959-4752(96)00015-1

Boekaerts, 2010, Using multiple calibration indices in order to capture the complex picture of what affects students’ accuracy of feeling of confidence, Learning and Instruction, 20, 372, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.03.002

Castel, 2007, The adaptive and strategic use of memory by older adults: evaluative processing and value-directed remembering, Vol. 48, 225

Dunlosky, 2011, Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time, 54, 103

Dunlosky, 2011, Improving college students’ evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 467, 10.1080/17470218.2010.502239

Dunlosky, 2005, The self-monitoring approach for effective learning, Cognitive Technology, 10, 4

Dunlosky, 2007, Metacomprehension: a brief history and how to improve its accuracy, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228, 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00509.x

Dunlosky, 1992, Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect, Memory & Cognition, 20, 373, 10.3758/BF03210921

Dunlosky, 2005, What constrains the accuracy of metacomprehension judgments? Testing the transfer-appropriate-monitoring and accessibility hypotheses, Journal of Memory and Language, 52, 551, 10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.011

Flavell, 1979, Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: a new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry, American Psychologist, 34, 906, 10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Griffin, 2008, Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation, Concurrent Processing and Cue Validity as Constraints on Metacomprehension Accuracy, 36, 93

Hays, 2011, .The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 797, 10.3758/PBR.17.6.797

Hines, 2009, Metacognitive influences on study time allocation in an associative recognition task: an analysis of adult age differences, Psychology and Aging, 24, 462, 10.1037/a0014417

Keren, 1991, Calibration and probability judgments: conceptual and methodological issues, Acta Psychologica, 77, 217, 10.1016/0001-6918(91)90036-Y

Kikas, 1998, The impact of teaching on students’ definitions and explanations of astronomical phenomena, Learning and Instruction, 8, 439, 10.1016/S0959-4752(98)00004-8

Koriat, 1996, Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy, Psychological Review, 103, 490, 10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.490

Koriat, 2006, The intricate relationships between monitoring and control in metacognition: lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 36, 10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.36

Kornell, 2007, .The promise and perils of self-regulated study, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 219, 10.3758/BF03194055

Lieberman, 1979, Behaviorism and the mind: A (limited) call for a return to introspection, American Psychologist, 34, 319, 10.1037/0003-066X.34.4.319

Lipko, 2009, Using standards to improve middle-school students’ accuracy at evaluating the quality of their recall, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 307, 10.1037/a0017599

Metcalfe, 2009, Metacognitive judgments and control of study, Current Directions in Psychology Science, 18, 159, 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01628.x

Metcalfe, 2008, .Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 174, 10.3758/PBR.15.1.174

Miller, 1960

Nelson, 1996, Consciousness and metacognition, American Psychologist, 51, 102, 10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.102

Nelson, 1994, Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning, Psychological Science, 5, 207, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x

Nelson, 1990, Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings, Vol. 26, 125

Nietfeld, 2006, The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy, Metacognition and Learning, 1, 159, 10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6

Pashler, 2007

Rawson, 2007, Improving students’ self-evaluation of learning for key concepts in textbook materials, European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 559, 10.1080/09541440701326022

Rawson, 2011, Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 37, 899

Rawson, K. A. & Dunlosky J (in press). Retrieval-monitoring-feedback (RMF) technique for producing efficient and durable learning. To appear in R. Azevedo (Ed.) The International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies.

Rhodes, 2011, The influence of delayed judgments of learning (JOLs) on metacognitive accuracy: a meta-analytic review, Psychological Bulletin, 137, 131, 10.1037/a0021705

Schmidt, 1992, New conceptualizations of practice – common principles in 3 paradigms suggest new concepts for training, Psychological Science, 3, 207, 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x

Schraw, 2009, A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring, Metacognition & Learning, 4, 33, 10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3

Shin, 2007, The adaptive nature of children’s overestimation in a strategic memory task, Cognitive Development, 22, 197, 10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.10.001

Son, 2000, Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204, 10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.204

Son, 2006, Metacognitive control and optimal learning, Cognitive Science, 30, 759, 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_74

Thiede, 1999, The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning, Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 662, 10.3758/BF03212976

Thiede, 2003, Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts, Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66, 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66

Thiede, 1999, Toward a general model of self-regulated study: an analysis of selection of items for study and self-paced study time, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1024, 10.1037/0278-7393.25.4.1024

Thiede, 2009, Metacognitive monitoring during and after reading, 85

Thomas, 2007, The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test, Processing in Memory and Metacomprehension, 35, 668

Winne, 1998, Studying as self-regulated learning, 277