Overcommunication in strategic information transmission games

Games and Economic Behavior - Tập 56 - Trang 7-36 - 2006
Hongbin Cai1, Joseph Tao-Yi Wang1
1Department of Economics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Blume, 1998, Experimental evidence on the evolution of meaning of messages in sender–receiver games, Amer. Econ. Rev., 88, 1323

Cai, H., Wang, J., 2004. Overcommunication and bounded rationality in strategic information transmission games: An experimental investigation. Working paper. UCLA. Available from http://www.econ.ucla.edu/Cai/overcommunication.pdf

Camerer, 2003

Camerer, 2004, A cognitive hierarchy theory of one-shot games, Quart. J. Econ., 119, 861, 10.1162/0033553041502225

Camerer, 1993, Cognition and framing in sequential bargaining for gains and losses

Costa-Gomes, 2001, Cognition and behavior in normal-form games: An experimental study, Econometrica, 69, 1193, 10.1111/1468-0262.00239

Crawford, 2003, Lying for strategic advantage: Rational and roundedly rational misrepresentation of intentions, Amer. Econ. Rev., 93, 133, 10.1257/000282803321455197

Eyster, E., Rabin, M., 2000. Cursed equilibrium. Working paper. UC, Berkeley

Farrell, 1996, Cheap talk, J. Econ. Perspect., 10, 103, 10.1257/jep.10.3.103

McKelvey, 1995, Quantal response equilibria in extensive form games, Exper. Econ., 1, 9, 10.1007/BF01426213

Ottaviani, M., Squintani, F., 2002. Not fully strategic information transmission. Working paper. London Business School

Stahl, 1995, On players' models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence, Games Econ. Behav., 10, 218, 10.1006/game.1995.1031