Overcoming the specific performance measurement challenges of knowledge‐intensive organizations

AkiJääskeläinen1, HarriLaihonen2
1Department of Industrial Management, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
2Department of Business Information Management and Logistics, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to identify practical ways to overcome the specific performance measurement challenges of knowledge‐intensive organizations. By reviewing performance measurement, service management and human resources management literature the paper recognizes two aspects that are crucial for the success of knowledge‐intensive organizations: the performance and well‐being of individual knowledge workers and the ability to provide value for the customer. The authors evaluate three measurement solutions for measuring these aspects, in three empirical settings.Design/methodology/approachQualitative case approach, carried out as an action research, is used with empirical data obtained through interviews, workshops and analysis of documentation related to measurement systems. The empirical study consists of three case studies where two main phases were carried out: investigating the status of existing measurement practices; and development and evaluation of new measurement approaches and tools.FindingsThe results of the evaluation of proposed measurement approaches provide understanding of their potential in different workplaces. Eventually, this potentially supports the managers of knowledge‐intensive organizations in developing not only the measurement practices but also the overall performance of their organizations.Originality/valueAs the key academic contribution, the study provides new understanding on the potential of selected measurement approaches in overcoming the specific performance measurement challenges in knowledge‐intensive organizations. The results take into account the perspectives of an individual knowledge worker, a customer and an organization as a whole. In many previous studies, the main focus has been solely on the organizational perspective.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alvesson, M. (1993), “Organizations as rhetoric: knowledge‐intensive companies and the struggle with ambiguity”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 30 No. 6, pp. 997‐1015.

Alvesson, M. (2001), “Knowledge work: ambiguity, image and identity”, Human Relations, Vol. 54 No. 7, pp. 863‐886.

Amabile, T.M. (1998), “How to kill creativity”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76 No. 5, pp. 77‐87.

Amir, A., Ahmad, N. and Mohamad, M. (2010), “An investigation on PMS attributes in service organisations in Malaysia”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 59 No. 8, pp. 734‐756.

Auzair, S. and Langfield‐Smith, K. (2005), “The effect of service process type, business strategy and life‐cycle stage on bureaucratic MCS in service organizations”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 399‐421.

Bailey, S. (2011), “Measuring the impacts of records management – data and discussion from the UK higher education sector”, Records Management Journal, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 46‐68.

Blackler, F. (1995), “Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: an overview and interpretation”, Organization Studies, Vol. 16 No. 6, pp. 1021‐1046.

Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2007), Business Research Methods, 2nd ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Chang, A. and Williams, I. (1999), “Designing levels for a/e consultant performance measures”, Project Management Journal, Vol. 30 No. 4, pp. 42‐54.

Clements‐Croome, D. and Kaluarachchi, Y. (2000), “Assessment and measurement of productivity”, in Clements‐Croome, D. (Ed.), Creating the Productive Workplace, E & FN Spon, Suffolk, pp. 129‐166.

Davenport, T.H. (2008), “Improving knowledge worker performance”, in Pantaleo, D. and Pal, N. (Ed.), From Strategy to Execution: Turing Accelerated Global Change into Opportunity, Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, pp. 215‐235.

Davern, M.J. and Kauffman, R.J. (2000), “Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 121‐143.

Deakins, E. and Dillon, S. (2006), “Management consultant (process) performance in local government”, International Journal of Public Sector Management, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 40‐56.

Drucker, P.F. (1999), “Knowledge‐worker productivity: the biggest challenge”, California Management Review, Vol. 41 No. 2, pp. 79‐94.

Dulewicz, V. and Fletcher, C. (1992), “The context and dynamics of performance appraisal”, in Harriot, P. (Ed.), Assessment and Selection in Organizations. Methods and Practice for Recruitment and Appraisal, 3rd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.

Ferris, G.R., Witt, L.A. and Hochwarter, W.A. (2001), “Interaction of social skill and general mental ability on job performance and salary”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 86 No. 6, pp. 1075‐1082.

Fisher, C. (2005), “Performance management and performing management”, in Leopold, J., Harris, L. and Watson, T. (Eds), The Strategic Managing of Human Resources, Prentice Hall, Essex, pp. 178‐210.

Greene, C. and Myerson, J. (2011), “Space for thought: designing for knowledge workers”, Facilities, Vol. 29 No. 1, pp. 19‐30.

Groen, B., van de Belt, M. and Wilderom, C. (2012), “Enabling performance measurement in a small professional service firm”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 61 No. 8, pp. 839‐862.

Grönroos, C. and Helle, P. (2010), “Adopting a service logic in manufacturing: conceptual foundation and metrics for mutual value creation”, Journal of Service Management, Vol. 21 No. 5, pp. 564‐590.

Grönroos, C. and Ojasalo, K. (2004), “Service productivity: towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57 No. 4, pp. 414‐423.

Gummesson, E. (2000), Qualitative Methods in Management Research, 2nd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Häkkinen, U. (2008), “Palveluketjut: tapa mitata tuotosta ja tehostaa tuotantoa”, in Ilmakunnas, S. (Ed.), Hyvinvointipalveluja Entistä Tehokkaammin – Uudistusten Mahdollisuuksia ja Keinoja, VATT Publications 48, Helsinki, pp. 97‐114 (in Finnish).

Hill, T.P. (1977), “On goods and services”, Review of Income and Wealth, Vol. 123 No. 4, pp. 315‐338.

Hinterhuber, A. (2008), “Customer value‐based pricing strategies: why companies resist”, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 41‐50.

Imbens, G.W. and Wooldridge, J. (2009), “Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 5‐86.

Ittner, C. (2008), “Does measuring intangibles for management purposes improve performance? A review of the evidence”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 261‐272.

Jääskeläinen, A. and Lönnqvist, A. (2009), “Designing operative productivity measures in public services”, VINE – Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 55‐67.

Janz, B.D., Colquitt, J.A. and Noe, R.A. (1997), “Knowledge worker team effectiveness: the role of autonomy, interdependence, team development, and contextual support variables”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 50 No. 4, pp. 877‐902.

Johnston, R. and Jones, P. (2004), “Service productivity. Towards understanding the relationship between operational and customer productivity”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 53 No. 33, pp. 201‐213.

Kahya, E. (2008), “The effects of job performance on effectiveness”, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 96‐104.

Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), “The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 71‐79.

Kemppilä, S. and Lönnqvist, A. (2003), “Subjective productivity measurement”, The Journal of American Academy of Business, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 531‐537.

Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., van Buuren, S., van der Beek, A. and de Vet, H. (2013), “Development of an individual work performance questionnaire”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 62 No. 1, pp. 6‐28.

Kujansivu, P. and Lönnqvist, A. (2009), “Measuring the impacts of an IC development service: the case of the Pietari business campus”, Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 469‐480.

Lettice, F., Roth, N. and Forstenlechner, I. (2006), “Measuring knowledge in the new product development process”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 55 Nos 3/4, pp. 217‐241.

Løwendahl, B., Revang, Ø. and Fosstenløkken, S. (2001), “Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms”, Human Relations, Vol. 54 No. 7, pp. 911‐931.

Mann, S., Budworth, M.H. and Ismaila, A. (2012), “Ratings of counterproductive performance: the effect of source and rater behavior”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 142‐156.

Miles, I. (2005), “Knowledge intensive business services: prospects and policies”, Foresight, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 39‐63.

Miller, D.B. (1977), “How to improve the performance and productivity of the knowledge worker”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 62‐80.

Parasuraman, A. (2004), “Assessing and improving service performance for maximum impact: insights from a two‐decade‐long research journey”, Performance Measurement & Metrics, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 45‐52.

Ramirez, Y.W. and Nembhard, D.A. (2004), “Measuring knowledge worker productivity: a taxonomy”, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp. 602‐628.

Ray, P.K. and Sahu, S. (1989), “The measurement and evaluation of white‐collar productivity”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 28‐48.

Rhee, S.K. and Rha, J.Y. (2009), “Public service quality and customer satisfaction: exploring the attributes of service quality in the public sector”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 29 No. 11, pp. 1491‐1512.

Riggs, J.L. (1986), “Monitoring with a matrix that motivates”, Performance Management Magazine, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 13‐19.

Sherwood, M.K. (1994), “Difficulties in the measurement of service outputs”, Monthly Labor Review, Vol. 117 No. 3, pp. 11‐19.

Takala, J., Suwansaranyu, U. and Phusavat, K. (2006), “A proposed white‐collar workforce performance measurement framework”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 No. 5, pp. 644‐662.

Thomas, B.E. and Baron, J.P. (1994), “Evaluating knowledge worker productivity: literature review”, Interim report, US Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Labs, Champaign, IL.

Toulson, P.K. and Dewe, P. (2004), “HR accounting as a measurement tool”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 75‐90.

Tucker, M. and Pitt, M. (2009), “Customer performance measurement in facilities management: a strategic approach”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Measurement, Vol. 58 No. 5, pp. 407‐422.

Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004), “Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 1‐17.

Von Nordenflycht, A. (2010), “What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge‐intensive firms”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 35 No. 1, pp. 155‐174.

Voss, C., Tsikriktsis, N. and Frohlich, M. (2002), “Case research in operations management”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 195‐219.

Wardell, I.C., Wynter, L. and Helander, M. (2008), “Capacity and value based pricing model for professional services”, Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 326‐340.