Outcome and functional capacity after prolonged intensive care unit stay

Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - Tập 118 - Trang 390-396 - 2006
Georg Delle Karth1, Brigitte Meyer1, Sabine Bauer1, Mariam Nikfardjam1, Gottfried Heinz1
1Department of Cardiology, Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Tóm tắt

BACKGROUND: An important proportion of critically ill patients who survives their acute illness remains in a critical state requiring intensive care management for weeks to months. Nevertheless, data on risk factors for in-hospital mortality and especially for long-term mortality and functional capacity are scarce. This study investigated outcome and prognostic factors in long-term critically ill patients. METHODS: This retrospective observational cohort study was performed at our mixed adult 8-bed cardiologic ICU at a 2200-bed University Hospital. Patient data from our local database connected to an Austrian multicenter program for quality assurance in intensive care were analyzed. Data were collected between March 1st, 1998 and December 31st, 2003. Patients with an ICU stay ≥30 days formed the long-term study group. Morbidity and functional capacity were assessed using the Barthel mobility index in telephone interviews. RESULTS: Patients spending ≥30 days in the ICU numbered 135 (10%) and occupied 5962 bed-days, representing 40.9% of the total bed-days. Compared with patients with an ICU stay <30 days, patients in the long-term group had a significantly higher SAPS II score during the first 24 hours after ICU admission (54 [IQR 41–65] vs. 38 [IQR 27–56], p < 0.001). There was a trend towards male preponderance in the long-term group (98/135 [82.6%] vs. 782/1215 [64.4%], p = 0.05). Differences in ICU and in-hospital mortality were not significant (28/135 (20.7%) vs. 295/1215 (24.3%), p = 0.620 and 46/135 [34.1%] vs. 360/1215 [29.6%], p = 0.285, respectively). After 12 and 48 months, the overall cumulative rates of death in hospital survivors were 14% and 26%, respectively in the short-term ICU group and 31% and 61% in the long-term group. A log-rank test revealed a significantly higher probability of survival in the short-term group after hospital discharge (log rank = 34.3, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of hospital survivors and non-survivors in the long-term group showed that the need for renal replacement therapy during the ICU stay was the sole independent predictor for in-hospital death and death within 1 year after ICU discharge (OR = 2.88; 95%CI 1.12–7.41, p = 0.028 and OR = 3.66, 95%CI 1.36–9.83, p = 0.01, respectively). In 28/31 long-term survivors (90%) in the long-term ICU group, the Barthel index indicated no or only moderate disability during daily activities. CONCLUSION: Hospital mortality rates in critically ill patients with a stay <30 or ≥30 days were comparable. The necessity for renal replacement therapy was the sole independent predictor for in-hospital and 1-year mortality in long-term ICU patients. Critically ill patients with a stay ≥30 days have a high and ongoing risk of death after hospital discharge; however, a substantial number of these patients are long-term survivors with no or only moderate disability during daily activities.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Available at: http://hcup.ahrq.gov/HCUPnet.asp. Accessed August 13th, 2005

Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

Vincent JL (2004) Evidence-based medicine in the ICU: important advances and limitations. Chest 126: 592–600

Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, et al (1999) Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 341: 625–634

Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, Esmail R, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ (1998) Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: a comparison of teaching and community hospitals. The Southwestern Ontario Critical Care Research Network. Crit Care Med 26: 245–251

Lameire N, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R (2005) Acute renal failure. Lancet 365: 417–430

Druml W (2004) Epidemiology Acute renal failure is not a "cute" renal failure! Intensive Care Med 30: 1886–1890

Empfehlungen zum Thema Therapiebegrenzung und -beendigung an Intensivstationen Konsensuspapier der Intensivmedizinischen Gesellschaften Österreich. Wien Klin Wochenschr 116: 763–767