Organizational responses to performance feedback: A meta-analytic review

Strategic Organization - Tập 19 Số 2 - Trang 285-311 - 2021
Serhan Kotiloglu1, Yan Chen2, Thomas Lechler3
1California State University, San Marcos USA
2Stevens Institute of Technology USA
3Boston University Metropolitan College, USA

Tóm tắt

Performance feedback theory has been recognized as a generative theory in organization and management studies that explains why, when, and how organizations initiate or discontinue specific strategic actions. Over the past decades, an extensive body of empirical research has tested the theory, refined its key tenets, and broadened its applications. Yet, empirical results on the effects of performance feedback often vary and even produce conflicting insights that are difficult to interpret. Following recent developments, we suggest that empirical controversies can be largely reconciled once we consider different performance feedback conditions, organizational actions, and boundary conditions. We conducted a meta-analytic review of 113 empirical studies to statistically evaluate how and why the effects of performance feedback may vary according to various factors. By identifying factors shaping organizational responses to performance feedback, this study helps integrate existing empirical evidence and offers new directions for future theoretical development and empirical research.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Aguinis H, 2019, Performance Management

10.1177/0149206310377113

10.1002/job.719

10.1177/1094428110375720

10.5465/annals.2016.0011

10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.11.001

10.1177/0001839216629671

10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.007

10.1287/mnsc.1050.0446

10.1257/aer.103.6.2121

10.1287/orsc.1060.0239

10.2189/asqu.50.4.536

10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323

10.1177/0149206312466148

10.1002/smj.2338

10.1002/smj.2278

10.1002/smj.2260

10.5465/amr.1981.4287985

10.2307/256301

10.1002/smj.2191

10.1108/17554251111152243

Bromiley P, 2016, The Routledge Companion to Strategic Risk Management, 140

10.1002/smj.2520

10.1142/S0219877016500024

10.5465/256688

10.1287/orsc.1070.0320

10.1002/smj.594

10.5465/amj.2011.0211

10.1111/joms.12427

10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00899.x

10.1002/smj.703

Cyert RM, 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm

Cyert RM, 1992, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2

10.1177/009207039101900106

Delmar F, 2007, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 27, 4

10.5465/ame.2000.2909845

10.1037/apl0000085

10.1287/orsc.1070.0335

10.1093/icc/dtt043

10.5465/amj.2013.0949

10.5465/amj.2013.0948

10.2307/2095101

10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x

10.1287/orsc.2013.0890

10.5465/amj.2002.7718946

Fisher RA, 1921, Metron, 1, 3

10.1287/orsc.1110.0644

10.5465/19416520.2012.656841

10.1287/orsc.1070.0277

10.1177/0149206315614375

10.1177/0149206317710723

10.2307/2393591

10.2307/30040661

10.1093/icc/12.5.1051

10.1017/CBO9780511615139

10.1093/icc/dtm013

10.5465/amj.2008.32625975

10.1002/smj.875

Greve HR, 2017, The Oxford Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning

10.3917/mana.165.0566

10.1287/orsc.1060.0241

10.2307/2393735

10.2307/2393338

Hofstede G, 2001, Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations

10.1287/orsc.1030.0056

Hunter JE, 1990, Methods of Meta-analysis

10.5465/amr.2008.33666024

10.5465/19416520.2015.1027086

10.1002/smj.2333

10.1007/s11575-009-0014-7

10.5465/amp.2012.0015

10.1177/0001839214566297

10.1111/corg.12108

10.5465/amj.2012.1102

10.1177/1476127017702568

10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254

10.1007/s11187-014-9556-6

10.1111/jpim.12046

10.1002/smj.2544

10.1177/1476127009349842

10.1287/mnsc.1120.1574

10.1016/j.intman.2014.12.001

10.1002/smj.2250

10.1016/j.jwb.2013.08.001

10.1016/j.intman.2010.12.004

10.1111/joms.12091

10.5465/amj.2010.0968

10.1177/0149206315584821

10.1177/0149206310396374

10.1016/0167-2681(88)90004-2

March JG, 1994, A Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen

10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.172

10.1287/orsc.8.6.698

10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.004

10.5465/20159563

10.1287/orsc.2014.0923

10.1177/1476127014529895

10.5465/256998

10.1002/smj.2105

10.1214/aoms/1177706717

10.1287/orsc.1060.0240

10.1177/0149206315569314

10.5465/annals.2016.0018

10.1002/smj.4250070602

10.1177/0149206308330560

10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638

10.1037/0033-2909.118.2.183

10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.04

10.1177/1476127012457983

Schmidt FL, 2014, Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1985.tb00565.x

10.1037/0278-7393.18.5.1040

10.1177/0149206316677298

10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00725.x

10.5465/amj.2007.28226158

10.1177/0149206311419856

10.1287/orsc.1100.0594

10.2307/1884852

10.2307/2391519

Simon HA, 1997, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization

10.2307/2666980

10.2307/2392337

10.1287/orsc.14.5.497.16761

10.2307/2937956

10.1002/smj.2367

10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.05.001

10.1037/0021-9010.75.3.315

10.5465/amj.2016.0749

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Strategic Organization

Tập 19 Số 2

285-311

Thông tin tác giả