Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Tóm tắt
The present article chronicles the history of the field of organizational justice, identifies current themes, and recommends new directions for the future. A historical overview of the field focuses on research and theory in the distributive justice tradition (e.g., equity theory) as well as the burgeoning topic of procedural justice. This forms the foundation for the discussion offive popular themes in contemporary organizational justice research: (a) attempts to distinguish procedural justice and distributive justice empirically, (b) the development of new conceptual advances, (c) consideration of the interpersonal determinants of procedural justice judgments, (d) new directions in tests of equity theory, and (e) applications of justice-based explanations to many different organizational phenomena. In closing, a plea is made for future work that improves procedural justice research methodologically (with respect to scope, setting, and scaling), and that attempts to integrate and unify disparate concepts in the distributive and procedural justice traditions.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arvey, R.D., 1985, Research in organizational behavior, 367
Berger, J., 1972, Sociological theories in progress, 21
Bies, R.J., Moving beyond equity theory: New directions in research on justice in organizations. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management
Bies, R.J., 1987, Research in organizational behavior, 289
Bies, R.J., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations: Vol. 1, 43
Block, N.J., 1976, The IQ controversy: Critical readings
Brett, J.M., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations: Vol. 1, 81
Brockner, J., 1989, Applied social psychology and organizational settings, 45
Campbell, J.P, 1976, Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 63
Cropanzano, R., Motivation and work behavior, 5
Crosby, F., 1982, Relative deprivation and working women
Crosby, F., 1984, Research in organizational behavior, 51
Folger, R., 1987, Social comparison, justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical empirical, and policy perspectives, 183
Folger, R., 1985, Research in personnel and human resources management, 141
Folger, R., 1986, Journal of Applied Psychology, 22, 531
Freedman, S.M., 1980, Academy ofManagement Review, 5, 381
Fry, W R., meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association
Fry, WR., The psychology of procedural justice. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association
Greenberg, J., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations: Vol. 1, 25
Greenberg, J. 1987d. Equity sensitivity: A situational alternative to the meta-construct. Unpublished manuscript, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
Greenberg, J., Communicating fairness in organizations. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management
Greenberg, J., 1990, Research in organizational behavior, 11
Greenberg, J., 1990, Research in personnel and human resources management, 265
Heneman, H.G., III, 1985, Research in personnel and human resources management: Vol. 3, 115
Heneman, R.L., 1990, Research in personnel and human resources management, 205
Homans, G.C., 1961, Social behavior: Its elementaryforms
Jacques, E., 1961, Equitable payment
Kanfer, R., Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2
Kolb, D.M., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations: Vol. 1, 207
Kolb, D.M., 1986, Personnel Administrator, 31, 77
Leung, K., Journal of Applied Psychology
Leventhal, G.S., 1976, Contemporary topics in social psychology, 211
Leventhal, G.S., 1980, Justice and social interaction, 167
Lewicki, R.J., Procedural fairness theory and research: Applications to human resource management. Symposium presented at the meeting of the Academy of Management
Lissak, R.I. 1983. Procedural fairness: How employees evaluate procedures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, Champaign.
Locke, E.A., 1986, International review of industrial and organizational psychology: 1986, 1
Locke, E.A., 1979, Research in organizational behavior, 265
Major, B., 1985, Journal of Applied Psychology, 21, 393
Martin, J., 1981, Research in organizational behavior, 53
Milkovich, G.T., 1987, Compensation, 2
Miner, J.B., 1984, The IndustriallOrganization Psychologist, 21, 9
Mowday, R.T., 1987, Motivation and work behavior, 4, 89
Nozick, R., 1974, Anarchy, state, and utopia
Okun, A.M., 1975, Equality and efficiency: The big tradeoff
Reichers, A.E., Organizational climate and culture
Scarpello, V., meeting of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology
Shapiro, D.L. 1989. Managing marginal employees: An examination of the effect of threats, impression management tactics, and cultural differences to disciplinary problems in the workplace. Unpublished manuscript, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Shapiro, D.L., meeting of the Academy of Management
Sheppard, B.H., 1983, Negotiation in organizations, 193
Sheppard, B.H., 1984, Research in organizational behavior, 141
Stouffer, S.A., 1949, The American soldier (Vol. 1): Adjustment during army life
Tornblom, K.Y., The nature and administration of justice: Interdisciplinary approaches
Thibaut, J., 1975, Procedural justice: A psychological analysis
Tyler, T.R., 1986, Research on negotiation in organizations, 7
Tyler, T.R., 1990, Why people follow the law: Proceduraljustice, legitimacy, and compliance
Tyler, T.R., 1989, Advances in applied social psychology: Business settings, 77
Tyler, T.R., Journal of Social Issues
Walster, E., 1978, Equity: Theory and research