Organisational learning and Six Sigma deployment readiness evaluation: a case study

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma - Tập 2 Số 1 - Trang 23-40 - 2011
YvonneLagrosen1, RanaChebl2, MaxRios Tuesta3
1Department of Engineering Sciences, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden
2Altran, Levallois‐Perret, France
3Altran Sud‐Ouest at Airbus SAS, Levallois‐Perret, France

Tóm tắt

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to provide a greater understanding of organisational learning in connection with assessment of Six Sigma readiness. Different forms that a possible deployment can take in the organisation's context based on the degree of readiness are explored.Design/methodology/approachThe empirical data are derived from 12 in‐depth semi‐structured interviews of selected employees having different functions in the studied organisation, a global distribution system and information technology (IT) solutions provider to the travel and tourism industry. In addition, they include participant observation and documentation. The interview questions were built based on a modified version of Kettinger and Grover readiness assessment framework.FindingsThe study shows that organisational learning can provide a useful framework for assessing Six Sigma readiness in an IT organisation. A synthesized model is proposed combining the frameworks of an adapted Kettinger and Grover model and the core disciplines of the learning organisation. Further, the results suggest that having Six Sigma as a company‐wide strategy may not prove useful or suitable in the current context. However, the analysis shows that having Six Sigma as an improvement programme provides a structure for the improvement work and the define, measure, analyze, improve and control methodology is needed to address some current inefficiencies and problems.Research limitations/implicationsThis is a single case study and the possibility of generalising this finding to other contexts remains uncertain. Therefore, more research is needed. The procedure of using organisational learning as an assessment framework for Six Sigma readiness has been shown to be useful.Practical implicationsImplementing Six Sigma means a large investment and therefore it is important to make the right deployment approach. Having one integrated readiness assessment model should be useful for companies when assessing their readiness.Originality/valueKnowledge of a Six Sigma readiness evaluation in an organisational learning context should be valuable for many organisations. In addition, research regarding Six Sigma in software companies is limited.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Anthony, J. and Banuelas, R. (2002), “Key ingredients for the effective implementation of Six Sigma program”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 20‐7.

Argyris, C. (1993), Knowledge for Action: A Guide to Overcoming Barriers to Organizational Change, Jossey‐Bass, San Francisco, CA.

Argyris, C. and Schön, D.A. (1996), Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice, Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Banuelas, R. and Anthony, J. (2002), “Critical success factors for the successful implementation of Six Sigma projects in organisations”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 92‐9.

Benedetto, A. (2002), “Adapting manufacturing‐based Six Sigma methodology to the service environment of a radiology film library”, Journal of Healthcare Management, Vol. 48 No. 4, pp. 263‐75.

Bergman, B. and Klefsjö, B. (2003), Quality from Customer Needs to Customer Satisfaction, Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Binder, R. (1997), “Can a manufacturing quality model work for software?”, IEEE Software, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 101‐5.

Bisgaard, S. and Freiesleben, J. (2004), “Six Sigma and the bottom line”, Quality Progress, Vol. 37 No. 9, pp. 57‐65.

Brady, J. and Allen, T. (2006), “Six Sigma literature: a review and agenda for future research”, Quality & Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 335‐67.

Carroll, S. (2005), “Guest editorial – ‘Can Six Sigma be used in software development?’”, ASQ, Six Sigma Forum Magazine, Vol. 4.

Charan, R. (1991), “How networks reshape organizations – for results”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69, pp. 104‐15.

Deming, W.E. (2000), The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Earl, M. (1994), “Viewpoint: new and old business process redesign”, Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 5‐22.

Eisenhart, K. (1998), “Building theories from case study research”, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 532‐45.

Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J. and Rein, G.L. (1991), “Groupware, some issues and experience”, Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, pp. 38‐57.

Fitzgerald, T.H. (1998), “Can change in organizational culture really be managed”, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 17, pp. 5‐15.

Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. and McKee, A. (2002), Primal Leadership, Realizing the Power of Emotional Intelligence, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

Grewal, D. and Salovey, P. (2005), “Feeling smart: the science of emotional intelligence”, American Scientist, Vol. 93, pp. 330‐9.

Grover, V., Jeong, S.Y., Kettinger, W.J. and Teng, J.T.C. (1995), “The implementation of business process reengineering”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 109‐44.

Guha, S., Grover, V., Kettinger, W.J. and Teng, J. (1997), “Business process change and organizational performance: exploring an antecedent model”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 14, pp. 119‐54.

Hensley, R. and Dobie, K. (2005), “Assessing readiness for Six Sigma in a service setting”, Managing Service Quality, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 82‐101.

Ingle, S. and Roe, W. (2001), “Six Sigma Black Belt implementation”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 13, pp. 273‐80.

Kenett, R. and Baker, R. (1999), Software Process Quality: Management Control, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.

Kettinger, W. and Grover, V. (1995), “Toward a theory of business process change management”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 9‐30.

Kilman, R., Saxton, M. and Serpa, R. (1986), “Issues in understanding and changing culture”, California Management Review, Vol. 28, pp. 87‐94.

Kotter, J. (1995), “Leading change: why transformation efforts fail”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 73, pp. 59‐67.

Linderman, K., Schroeder, R., Zaheer, S. and Choo, A. (2003), “Six Sigma: a goal‐theoretic perspective”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 193‐203.

Magnusson, K., Kroslid, D. and Bergman, B. (2003), Six Sigma: the Pragmatic Approach, 2nd ed., Studentlitteratur, Lund.

Mahanti, R. and Antony, J. (2005), “Confluence of Six Sigma, simulation and software development”, Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 20 No. 7, pp. 739‐62.

Mayer, J.D., Salovey, P., Gomberg‐Kaufman, S. and Blainey, K. (1991), “A broader conception of mood experience”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 60 No. 1, pp. 100‐11.

Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. (1985), “Of strategies deliberate and emergent”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, pp. 257‐72.

Montgomery, D. (2001), “Beyond Six Sigma”, Quality & Reliability Engineering International, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 3‐4.

O'Reilly, C. (1989), “Corporations, culture and commitment: motivation and social control in organizations”, California Management Review, Vol. 31, pp. 9‐25.

Pande, P., Neuman, R. and Cavanagh, R. (2000), The Six Sigma Way: How GE, Motorola, and Other Top Companies are Honing Their Performance, McGraw‐Hill, New York, NY.

Saffold, G.S. (1988), “Culture traits, strenghts and organization performance: moving beyond strong culture”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13, pp. 546‐58.

Schneider, B., Brief, A.P. and Guzzo, R.A. (1996), “Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational change”, Organisational Dynamics, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 7‐19.

Sehwail, L. and DeYong, C. (2003), “Six Sigma in health care”, Leadership in Health Services, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 1‐5.

Senge, P.M. (2006), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, 2nd ed., Currency Doubleday, New York, NY.

Senge, P.M., Scharmer, C.O., Jaworski, J. and Flowers, B.S. (2005), Presence: Exploring Profound Change in People, Organizations and Society, Nicholas Brealey, London.

Siviy, J., Penn, L. and Harper, E. (2006), “Relationships between CMMI and Six Sigma”, Software Engineering Measurement Analysis – SEI 2006, available at: www.sei.cmu.edu.

Tjosvold, D. and Deemer, D. (1980), “Effects of controversy within a cooperative or competitive context on organizational decision making”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 65, pp. 590‐5.

Tushman, M. and Nadler, D. (1986), “Organizing for innovation”, California Management Review, Vol. 28, pp. 74‐92.

Weick, K.E. (1979), The Social Psychology of Organizing, 2nd ed., Addison‐Wesley, Reading, MA.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

International Journal of Lean Six Sigma

Tập 2 Số 1

23-40

Thông tin tác giả