Opting for the English rule: On the contractual re-allocation of legal fees
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bebchuk, 1999, Damage measures for inadvertent breach of contract, Int. Rev. Law Econ., 19, 319, 10.1016/S0144-8188(99)00016-2
Bebchuk, 1984, Litigation and settlement under imperfect information, RAND J. Econ., 15, 404, 10.2307/2555448
Carbonara, 2015, Rent-seeking and litigation: the hidden virtues of limited fee shifting, Rev. Law Econ., 11, 113, 10.1515/rle-2015-0027
Choi, 2018, Fee-shifting and shareholder litigation, Va Law Rev., 104, 59
Donohue, 1991, The effects of fee shifting on the settlement rate: theoretical observations on costs, conflicts, and contingent fees, Law Contemp. Probl., 54, 195, 10.2307/1191929
Donohue, 1991, Opting for the British rule, or if Posner and Shavell can’t remember the Coase theorem, who will?, Harvard Law Rev., 104, 1093, 10.2307/1341673
Farmer, 1999, Legal expenditure as a rent-seeking game, Public Choice, 100, 271, 10.1023/A:1018368124943
Farmer, 2002, Pretrial bargaining with self-serving bias and asymmetric information, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 48, 163, 10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00236-0
Friedman, 2010, Chilling, settlement, and the accuracy of legal process, J. Law Econ. Organ., 26, 144, 10.1093/jleo/ewn018
Helland, 2017, Estimating the effects of the English rule on litigation outcomes, Rev. Econ. Stat., 99, 678, 10.1162/REST_a_00653
Hua, 2005, Information and externalities in sequential litigation, J. Inst. Theor. Econ., 161, 215, 10.1628/0932456054193676
Hughes, 1995, Litigation and settlement under the English and American rules: theory and evidence, J. Law Econ., 38, 225, 10.1086/467330
Hyde, 2002, Necessary costs and expenditure incentives under the English rule, Int. Rev. Law Econ., 22, 133, 10.1016/S0144-8188(02)00087-X
Klement, 2005, Against compromise: a mechanism design approach, J. Law Econ. Organ., 21, 285, 10.1093/jleo/ewi020
Mookherjee, 1989, Optimal auditing, insurance, and redistribution, Q. J. Econ., 104, 399, 10.2307/2937855
Shavell, 1982, Suit, settlement and trial: a theoretical analysis under alternative methods for the allocation of legal cost, J. Legal Stud., 11, 55, 10.1086/467692
Shavell, 1997, The fundamental divergence between the private and the social motive to use the legal system, J. Legal Stud., 26, 575, 10.1086/468008
Spier, 1994, Pretrial bargaining and the design of fee-shifting rules, RAND J. Econ., 25, 197, 10.2307/2555827
