Opportunities and challenges for Common Agricultural Policy reform to support the European Green Deal

Conservation Biology - Tập 37 Số 3 - 2023
Ivon Cuadros‐Casanova1, Andrea Cristiano1,2, Dino Biancolini1, Marta Cimatti1, Andrea Antonio Sessa1, Valeria Y. Mendez Angarita1, Chiara Dragonetti1, Michela Pacifici1, Carlo Rondinini1, Moreno Di Marco1
1Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
2Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Tóm tắt

Abstract

The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is the European Union's main instrument for agricultural planning, with a new reform approved for 2023–2027. The CAP intends to align with the European Green Deal (EGD), a set of policy initiatives underpinning sustainable development and climate neutrality in the European Union (EU), but several flaws cast doubts about the compatibility of the objectives of these 2 policies. We reviewed recent literature on the potential of CAP environmental objectives for integration with the EGD: protection of biodiversity, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and sustainable management of natural resources. The CAP lacks appropriate planning measures, furthering instead risks to biodiversity and ecosystem services driven by landscape and biotic homogenization. Funding allocation mechanisms are not tailored to mitigate agricultural emissions, decreasing the efficiency of climate mitigation actions. The legislation subsidies farmers making extensive use of synthetic inputs without adequately supporting organic production, hindering the transition toward sustainable practices. We recommend proper control mechanisms be introduced in CAP Strategic Plans from each member state to ensure the EU is set on a sustainable production and consumption path. These include proportional assignment of funds to each CAP objective, quantitative targets to set goals and evidence‐based interventions, and relevant indicators to facilitate effective monitoring of environmental performance. Both the CAP and the EGD should maintain ambitious environmental commitments in the face of crisis to avoid further degradation of the natural resources on which production systems stand.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Alliance Environment, 2018, Evaluation study of the impact of the CAP on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions

Alliance Environment. (2019).Evaluation of the impact of the CAP on habitats landscapes biodiversity(Final Report).European Commission.

10.1186/1476-069X-7-50

Boshnakova M., 2021, EU 28: Oilseeds and products semi‐annual

Catanoso J.(2020).French Guiana soy biofuel power plants risk massive Amazon deforestation.Mongabay.https://news.mongabay.com/2020/12/french‐guiana‐soy‐biofuel‐power‐plants‐risk‐massive‐amazon‐deforestation/

Corporate Europe Observatory. (2020).CAP vs Farm to Fork. Will we pay billions to destroy or to support biodiversity climate and farmers?Author.

Council of the European Union. (2021).Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common agricultural policy and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Author.

10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.08.005

European Commission. (2019a).The European Green Deal(COM/2019/640 final). Author.

European Commission. (2019b).Indicative outline of terms of reference for the ex‐ante evaluation of the CAP strategic plan(TWG‐7/Tool 1.2). Author.

European Commission. (2020a).Analysis of links between CAP Reform and Green Deal(SWD(2020) 93 final). Author.

European Commission. (2020b).Report from the commission to the European parliament and the council on the experience gained by Member States on the implementation of national targets established in their National Action Plans and on progress in the implementation of Directive 2009/128/EC on the sustainable use of pesticides. Author.

European Commission, 2020, EU agriculture in numbers – Performance on the nine specific objectives of the CAP. EU country factsheets

European Commission. (2020d).Farm to fork strategy: For a fair healthy and environmentally‐friendly food system. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament the Council the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Author.

European Commission. (2022).Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1475 of 6 September 2022 laying down detailed rules for implementation of Regulation (EU) 2021/2115 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the evaluation of the CAP Strategic Plans and the provision of information for monitoring and evaluation. Author.

European Court of Auditors, 2017, Greening: A more complex income support scheme, not yet environmentally effective

European Court of Auditors, 2020, Biodiversity on farmland: CAP contribution has not halted the decline

European Court of Auditors, 2020, Protection of wild pollinators in the EU ‐ Commission initiatives have not borne fruit

European Environment Agency. (2019).The European Environment—State and outlook 2020: Knowledge for transition to a sustainable Europe. Author.

European Parliament. (2020).Towards a post‐2020 common agricultural policy. Fact sheets on the European Union.https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/113/towards‐a‐post‐2020‐common‐agricultural‐policy

Eurostat. (2021).Agri‐environmental indicator ‐ consumption of pesticides.https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics‐explained/index.php?title=Agri‐environmental_indicator_‐_consumption_of_pesticides

10.1038/ncomms9568

10.1016/j.tree.2019.01.003

Guyomard H., 2020, The Green Deal and the CAP: Policy implications to adapt farming practices and to preserve the EU's natural resources

10.1002/pan3.31

Hanson C., 2022, The Ukraine crisis threatens a sustainable food future

10.1016/j.agee.2011.05.006

Keenleyside C., 2014, High nature value farming throughout EU‐27 and its financial support under the CAP, 91086

Kuepper B., 2022, Mapping the European soy supply chain – Embedded soy in animal products consumed in the EU27+UK

Lefebvre M., 2012, The influence of the Common Agricultural Policy on agricultural landscapes

Martineau H., 2016, Effective performance of tools for climate action policy‐meta‐review of Common Agricultural Policy mainstreaming

Muller A., 2017, Agriculture and deforestation: The EU Common Agricultural Policy, soy, and forest destruction

10.1002/9781118229088.ch4

10.1038/s41559-018-0724-y

Official Journal of the European Union. (2021).Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’). Author.

Pe'er G. Birkenstock M. Lakner S. &Röder N.(2021).The Common Agricultural Policy post‐2020. Views and recommendations from scientists to improve performance for biodiversity: Volume 1 ‐ Synthesis Report (No. 311098). Johann Heinrich von Thuenen‐Institut (vTI).

10.1002/pan3.10080

10.1111/conl.12901

Pe'er G., 2017, Is the CAP Fit for purpose. An evidence‐based, rapid fitness‐check assessment

10.1126/science.aax3146

Potts S. G., 2016, The assessment report of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services on pollinators, pollination and food production

Robinson T. P. Thornton P. K. Francesconi G. N. Kruska R. L. Chiozza F. Notenbaert A. M. O. Cecchi G. Herrero M. Epprecht M. Fritz S. You L. Conchedda G. &See L.(2011).Global livestock production systems. FAO and ILRI.

10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.011

10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104099

10.1038/s41559-022-01786-z

10.1002/adsu.202000146

10.1016/j.cosust.2019.04.011