Operationalising Pluriliteracies in a Lesson Planning Tool for Vocational CLIL Teachers
Tóm tắt
Whilst researchers agree that the integration of content and language goals is the operative principle behind any successful CLIL programme, there is an ongoing debate over how we can best conceptualise this integration for practical use. A promising way of integrating content and language goals in CLIL teaching is foregrounding the subject/pluriliteracies skills relevant to the respective CLIL subjects, and using them as a guide to offer targeted language support and multimodal scaffolding measures. Yet the content teachers typically involved in CLIL programmes in Austria are seldom trained in subject literacy education or foreign language teaching methodology, which makes the task of translating a content and language integrated model into CLIL practice especially demanding. This becomes even more challenging at Austrian technical colleges, where CLIL programmes typically focus on highly specialised technical content subjects in which cognitive demand is high in terms of both content and language. To support teachers at technical colleges in implementing an integrated CLIL model, this project aims at developing a CLIL lesson planning tool that operationalises subject literacy for the context of technical colleges. Following a design-based research (DBR) approach, the tool is designed in collaboration with two novice CLIL teachers and tested in their respective subjects recycling technology and control engineering. Both the process and the outcome of this project offer new insights into CLIL lesson planning and vocational CLIL in general. The lesson planning tool itself holds the potential to improve CLIL practice in the often-neglected context of vocational CLIL, thus bridging the gap between theory and practice.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abuja, G., & Heindler, D. (1993). Englisch als Arbeitssprache: Fachbezogenes Lernen von Fremdsprachen. Zentrum für Schulversuche und Schulentwicklung.
Airey, J. (2009). Science, language and literacy. Case studies of learning in Swedish university physics. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Uppsala]. Uppsala University Library. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:312309
Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. Longman.
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16–25.
Austrian Federal Ministry of Education. (2018). Abschlüsse, Anerkennung und Qualifikationen. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Forschung. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.bmbwf.gv.at/Themen/schule/schulsystem/sa/bmhs/bmhs_aaq.html
Austrian Federal Ministry of Education. (2011). Allgemeines Bildungsziel, schulautonome Lehrplanbestimmungen, didaktische Grundsätze und Bildungs- und Lehraufgabe sowie Lehrstoff der gemeinsamen Unterrichtsgegenstände an den technischen, gewerblichen und kunstgewerblichen Fachschulen. RIS Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2016_II_240/COO_2026_100_2_1272239.pdfsig
Austrian Federal Ministry of Education. (2015). Gesamte Rechtsvorschrift für Lehrpläne der höheren technischen und gewerblichen Lehranstalten 2015. RIS Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/GeltendeFassung.wxe?Abfrage=Bundesnormen&Gesetzesnummer=20009288
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004). Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 1–14.
Bauer-Marschallinger, S. (2022). CLIL with a capital I: Using cognitive discourse functions to integrate content and language learning in CLIL history education (Publication No. 62480) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Vienna]. U:theses. https://utheses.univie.ac.at/detail/62480/
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans.
Cammarata, L., & Cavanagh, M. (2018). In search of immersion teacher educators’ knowledge base. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education, 6(2), 189–217.
COST – European Cooperation in Science and Technology. (2022). CLIL network for languages in education: Towards bi- and multilingual disciplinary literacies (CLILNetLE). COST EU. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.cost.eu/actions/CA21114/
Coyle, D., & Meyer, O. (2021). Beyond CLIL: Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. John Benjamins.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2013). A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 216–253.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2015). Elemente einer ‚academic literacy‘: Kognitive Diskursfunktionen im englischsprachigen Fachunterricht (CLIL). In S. Schmölzer-Eibinger, & E. Thürmann, (Eds.), Schreiben als Medium des Lernens. Kompetenzentwicklung durch Schreiben im Fachunterricht (pp. 115–130). Waxmann.
Federal Chancellery of the Republic of Austria. (2017). Bundesgesetz über die Qualifikationsbezeichnungen ‚Ingenieurin‘ und ‚Ingenieur‘ (Ingenieurgesetz 2017 – IngG 2017). RIS Rechtsinformationssystem des Bundes. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.ris.bka.gv.at/Dokumente/BgblAuth/BGBLA_2017_I_23/BGBLA_2017_I_23.pdfsig
Green, S. (2020). Scaffolding academic literacy with low-proficiency users of English. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hasenberger, T. (2018). ’The science of it …’: Designing and teaching a CLIL curriculum. CELT Matters, 2018(2), 11–18.
He, P., & Lin, A.M.Y. (2020). Becoming a ‘language-aware’ content teacher. Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teacher professional development as a collaborative, dynamic, and dialogic process. In L. Cammarata, & T. J., Ó Ceallaigh, (Eds.), Teacher development for immersion and content-based instruction (pp. 11–37). John Benjamins.
Hüttner, J., Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2013). The power of beliefs: Lay theories and their influence on the implementation of CLIL programmes. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 16(3), 267–284.
Llinares, A., Morton, T., & Whittaker, R. (2012). The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge University Press.
Mathieu, C. (2021). (Re)designing materials for content/language integration: Teachers’ conceptualizations and enactments in secondary dual language and immersion [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/224666
Meyer, O. (2010). Towards quality CLIL: Successful planning and teaching strategies. Puls, 33, 11–29.
Mintrop, R. (2016). Design-based school improvement. A practical guide for education leaders. Harvard Education.
Moore, P., & Lorenzo, F. (2015). Task-based learning and content and language integrated learning materials design: Process and product. The Language Learning Journal, 43(3), 334–357.
OeAD – Österreichischer Austauschdienst. (2022). Überblick über das österreichische Bildungssystem. Das österreichische Bildungssystem. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.bildungssystem.at/
Prediger, S., Clarkson, P., & Bose, A. (2016). Purposefully relating multilingual registers: Building theory and teaching strategies for bilingual learners based on an integration of three traditions. In R. Barwell, P. Clarkson, A. Halai, M. Kazima, J. Moschkovich, & N. Planas (Eds.), Mathematics education and language diversity (pp. 193–215). Springer.
Smit, U., & Finker, T. (2016). Zur Implementierung von CLIL in den Regelunterricht an HTL: Fragenentwicklung für die Evaluation und Fallstudien zur Unterrichtspraxis: Endbericht des Forschungsprojekts. Bundesministerium für Unterricht, Kunst und Kultur (bmukk).
Tedick, D. J., & Lyster, R. (2020). Scaffolding language development in immersion and dual language classrooms. Routledge.
van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, R. M. Branch, K. Gustafson, N. Nienke, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Design approaches and tools in education and training (pp. 1–14). Springer.
Wolf, S. (2016). CLIL in Austrian technical colleges (HTL) – a case study of teachers’ beliefs (Publication No. 37312) [Diploma thesis, University of Vienna]. U:theses. https://utheses.univie.ac.at/detail/37312/
Young, A. (2015). Student oral proficiency in grade three Spanish immersion: Linguistic diversity, student interaction and differentiated scaffolding [Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota]. University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/175381