Online Science Instruction Can Promote Adolescents’ Autonomy Need Satisfaction: a Latent Growth Curve Analysis

Apedoe, X. S., Walker, S. E., & Reeves, T. C. (2006). Integrating inquiry-based learning into undergraduate geology. Journal of Geoscience Education, 54(3), 414–421. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-54.3.414

Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003379

Calafiore, P., & Damianov, D. S. (2011). The effect of time spent online on student achievement in online economics and finance courses. The Journal of Economic Education, 42(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2011.581934

Carey, G. B., Ezelle, H. J., Steinle, N., Cao, Q., Simington, L., Matson, C., Singh, N., Jones, L., Mohindra, P., Cullen, K. J., Giglio, M., Parker, E., & Hassel, B. A. (2022). Robust institutional support and collaboration between summer training programs in cancer and biomedicine drive the pivot to a virtual format in response to the COVID pandemic. Journal of Cancer Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-021-02124-w

Cavanaugh, J. K., & Jacquemin, S. J. (2015). A large sample comparison of grade-based student learning outcomes in online vs. face-to-face courses. Online Learning, 19(2), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i2.454

Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A qualitative approach from a self-determination theory perspective. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1926289

Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(8), 930–942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002

Deemer, E. D., Ogas, J. P., Barr, A. C., Bowdon, R. D., Hall, M. C., Paula, S., Capobianco, B. M., & Lim, S. (2022). Scientific research identity development need not wait until college: Examining the motivational impact of a pre-college authentic research experience. Research in Science Education, 52(5), 1481–1496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-021-09994-6

Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 543–547. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p543

Duran, M., & Dökme, I. (2016). The effect of inquiry-based learning approach on students’ critical thinking skills. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(12), 2887–2908. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.02311a

Dutton, J., Dutton, M., & Perry, J. (2001). Do online students perform as well as lecture students? Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2001.tb00580.x

Gómez, R. L., & Suárez, A. M. (2020). Do inquiry-based teaching and school climate influence science achievement and critical thinking? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00240-5

Gross, G., Ling, R., Richardson, B., & Quan, N. (2022). In-person or virtual training? Comparing the effectiveness of community-based training. American Journal of Distance Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2022.2029090

Hagger, M. S., Sultan, S., Hardcastle, S. J., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2015). Perceived autonomy support and autonomous motivation toward mathematics activities in educational and out-of-school contexts is related to mathematics homework behavior and attainment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.12.002

Hart, C. M. D., Friedmann, E., & Hill, M. (2018). Online course-taking and student outcomes in California community colleges. Education Finance and Policy, 13(1), 42–71. https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00218

Hsu, H.-C.K., Wang, C. V., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2019). Reexamining the impact of self-determination theory on learning outcomes in the online learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 24(3), 2159–2174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09863-w

Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science Education, 91(1), 36–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20173

Jungert, T., & Koestner, R. (2015). Science adjustment, parental and teacher autonomy support and the cognitive orientation of science students. Educational Psychology, 35(3), 361–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.828826

Knutson, K., Smith, J., Wallert, M. A., & Provost, J. J. (2010). Bringing the excitement and motivation of research to students: Using inquiry and research-based learning in a year-long biochemistry laboratory. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 38(5), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20400

McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., Woods-McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Inquiry, engagement, and literacy in science: A retrospective, cross-national analysis using PISA 2006. Science Education, 98(6), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21135

Morris, K. J., Brown, H. K. M., Swift, B. C., Hall, E. Q., Umayam, K., Tenenbaum, L. S., Ekanem, N. B., Ramadorai, S. B., Canas, E. E., Shearer, L. N., & Yourick, D. L. (2021). Conversion of summer STEM program from in-person to virtual learning offers unexpected positives and pitfalls. Journal of STEM Outreach, 4(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15695/jstem/v4i4.10

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962

Race, A. I., De Jesus, M., Beltran, R. S., & Zavaleta, E. S. (2021). A comparative study between outcomes of an in-person versus online introductory field course. Ecology and Evolution, 11(8), 3625–3635. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7209

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Schneider, M., Williams, S., & Ghoush, S. (2022). Comparison of in-person and virtual labs/tutorials for engineering students using blended learning principles. Education Sciences, 12(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030153

Wood, R. (2019). Students’ motivation to engage with science learning activities through the lens of self-determination theory: Results from a single-case school-based study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106110

Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). The effectiveness of distance education across Virginia’s community colleges: Evidence from introductory college-level math and English courses. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373711413814