On the strategic value of equifinal choice
Tóm tắt
Managers are often faced with the need to choose among multiple satisficing options. We call this situation
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adner R, Csaszar FA, Zemsky PB (2014) Positioning on a multiattribute landscape. Manage Sci 60(11):2794–2815
Agrawal A, Gans J, Goldfarb A (2018) Prediction machines: the simple economics of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Press, New York
Anderson P, Tushman ML (1990) Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change. Admin Sci Quart 1:604–633
Argyris C (1977) Double loop learning in organizations. Harv Bus Rev 55(5):115–125
Aristotle (350 BCE) On the Heavens. Book II, Part XIII
Barnett WP, Pontikes EG (2008) The Red Queen, success bias, and organizational inertia. Manage Sci 54(7):1237–1251
Berger J, Osterloh M, Rost K, Ehrmann T (2020) How to prevent leadership hubris? Comparing competitive selections, lotteries, and their combination. The Leadership Quarterly 1:101388
Bridoux F, Stoelhorst JW (2022) Stakeholder governance: solving the collective action problems in joint value creation. Acad Manag Rev
Burton RM, Obel B (1984) Designing efficient organizations. Adv Ser Manag 7:1
Burton RM, Håkonsson DD, Nickerson J, Puranam P, Workiewicz M, Zenger T (2017) GitHub: exploring the space between boss-less and hierarchical forms of organizing. J Organ Des 6(1):1–19
Camuffo A, Cordova A, Gambardella A, Spina C (2020) A scientific approach to entrepreneurial decision making: Evidence from a randomized control trial. Manage Sci 66(2):564–586
Christensen M, Knudsen T (2020) Division of roles and endogenous specialization. Ind Corp Chang 29(1):105–124
Cohn DA, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1996) Active learning with statistical models. J Artif Intell Res 4:129–145
Creignou N, Kröll M, Pichler R, Skritek S, Vollmer H (2019) A complexity theory for hard enumeration problems. Discret Appl Math 268:191–209
Csaszar FA (2012) Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: evidence from mutual funds. Strateg Manag J 33(6):611–632
Csaszar FA (2013) An efficient frontier in organization design: Organizational structure as a determinant of exploration and exploitation. Organ Sci 24(4):1083–1101
Csaszar FA, Eggers JP (2013) Organizational decision making: an information aggregation view. Manage Sci 59(10):2257–2277
Csaszar FA, Ostler J (2020) A contingency theory of representational complexity in organizations. Organ Sci 31(5):1198–1219
Cyert RM, March JG (1963) A behavioral theory of the firm. Wiley-Blackwell, New York
Debreu G (1960) Review of ‘Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis’ by R. D Luce. Am Econ Rev 50:186–188
Denrell J, Fang C, Liu C (2015) Perspective—Chance explanations in the management sciences. Organ Sci 26(3):923–940
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 1:147–160
Doty DH, Glick WH, Huber GP (1993) Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: a test of two configurational theories. Acad Manag J 36(6):1196–1250
Eisenhardt KM (1988) Agency-and institutional-theory explanations: the case of retail sales compensation. Acad Manag J 31(3):488–511
Fast NJ, Gruenfeld DH, Sivanathan N, Galinsky AD (2009) Illusory control: a generative force behind power’s far-reaching effects. Psychol Sci 20(4):502–508
Ferguson TS (1989) Who solved the secretary problem? Stat Sci 4(3):282–289
Fiss PC (2007) A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1180–1198
Friedman M (1953) Essays in positive economics. University of Chicago press, Chicago
Gans JS, Stern S, Wu J (2019) Foundations of entrepreneurial strategy. Strateg Manag J 40(5):736–756
Gavetti G, Menon A (2016) Evolution cum agency: toward a model of strategic foresight. Strat Sci 1(3):207–233
Glynn PW, Greve HR, Rao H (2020) Relining the garbage can of organizational decision-making: modeling the arrival of problems and solutions as queues. Ind Corp Chang 29(1):125–142
Goodwin, B. (2013). Justice by lottery. Andrews UK Limited.
Gresov C, Drazin R (1997) Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Acad Manag Rev 22(2):403–428
Grønsund T, Aanestad M (2020) Augmenting the algorithm: emerging human-in-the-loop work configurations. J Strat Inform Syst 29(2):101614
Gul F, Natenzon P, Pesendorfer W (2014) Random choice as behavioral optimization. Econometrica 82(5):1873–1912
Hampel CE, Tracey P, Weber K (2020) The art of the pivot: How new ventures manage identification relationships with stakeholders as they change direction. Acad Manag J 63(2):440–471
Hannan MT, Freeman J (1986) Where do organizational forms come from?. In Sociological forum (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 50–72). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
He, V. F., Puranam, P., Shrestha, Y. R., & von Krogh, G. (2020). Resolving governance disputes in communities: a study of software license decisions. Strat Manag J
Henderson RM, Clark KB (1990) Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin Sci Quart 1:9–30
Katz D, Kahn RL (1978) The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2, p. 528). New York: Wiley
Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A (2020) Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Acad Manag Ann 14(1):366–410
Kelly D, Amburgey TL (1991) Organizational inertia and momentum: a dynamic model of strategic change. Acad Manag J 34(3):591–612
Kerr WR, Nanda R, Rhodes-Kropf M (2014) Entrepreneurship as experimentation. J Econ Persp 28(3):25–48
Ketel N, Leuven E, Oosterbeek H, van der Klaauw B (2016) The returns to medical school: evidence from admission lotteries. Am Econ J Appl Econ 8(2):225–254
Kinniment DJ (2008) Synchronization and arbitration in digital systems. Wiley
Klapper HJ, Maciejovsky B, Reitzig M (2019) Influence, interests and information in organizational decision making. Acad Manag Proc 2019(1):11990
Klein KJ, Sorra JS (1996) The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manag Rev 21(4):1055–1080
Levinthal DA, Rerup C (2021) The plural of goal: learning in a world of ambiguity. Organ Sci 32(3):527–543
Liu C (2021) In luck we trust: capturing the diversity bonus through random selection. J Organ Des 1:1–7
Liu C (2019). Solving the Brexit Deadlock by Lottery. Psychology Today.
Luce RD (1959) Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. Wiley, New York
March JC, March JG (1977) Almost random careers: the Wisconsin school superintendency, 1940–1972. Admin Sci Quart 1:377–409
March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. John Wiley & Sons
Marengo L (2015) Representation, search, and the evolution of routines in problem solving. Ind Corp Chang 24(5):951–980
Matejka J, Fitzmaurice G (2017) Same stats, different graphs: generating datasets with varied appearance and identical statistics through simulated annealing. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. pp 1290–1294
Minsky M (1988) Society of mind. Simon and Schuster
Murray A, Rhymer J, Sirmon DG (2020) Human and Technology: Forms of Conjoined Agency in Organizations. Acad Manag Rev
Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, Mass, Belknap
Newborn M (2012) Kasparov versus Deep Blue: Computer chess comes of age. Springer, New York
Nickerson JA, Zenger TR (2002) Being efficiently fickle: a dynamic theory of organizational choice. Organ Sci 13(5):547–566
O’Flaherty B, Siow A (1991) Promotion lotteries. J Law Econ Organ 7(2):401–409
Payne GT (2006) Examining configurations and firm performance in a suboptimal equifinality context. Organ Sci 17(6):756–770
Porter ME (1996) What is strategy? Harv Bus Rev 74(6):61–78
Posen HE, Levinthal DA (2012) Chasing a moving target: exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Manage Sci 58(3):587–601
Posen HE, Keil T, Kim S, Meissner FD (2018) Renewing research on problemistic search—a review and research agenda. Acad Manag Ann 12(1):208–251
Puranam P (2021) Human–AI collaborative decision-making as an organization design problem. J Organ Des 1:1–6
Puranam P, Håkonsson DD (2015) Valve’s Way. J Organ Des 4(2):2–4
Puranam P, Swamy M (2016) How initial representations shape coupled learning processes. Organ Sci 27(2):323–335
Puranam P, Raveendran M, Knudsen T (2012) Organization design: the epistemic interdependence perspective. Acad Manag Rev 37(3):419–440
Puranam P, Alexy O, Reitzig M (2014) What’s “new” about new forms of organizing? Acad Manag Rev 39(2):162–180
Raveendran M, Silvestri L, Gulati R (2020) The Role of interdependence in the microfoundations of organization design: task, goal, and knowledge interdependence. Acad Manag Ann
Rerup C, Feldman MS (2011) Routines as a source of change in organizational schemata: the role of trial-and-error learning. Acad Manag J 54(3):577–610
Rescher N (1959) Choice without preference: a study of the history and of the logic of the problem of “Buridan’s Ass.” Kant-Studien 51(1–4):142–175
Rich BR, Janos L (2013) Skunk works: A personal memoir of my years of Lockheed. Little, Brown
Rivkin JW, Siggelkow N (2003) Balancing search and stability: interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Manage Sci 49(3):290–311
Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1985) Learning internal representations by error propagation (No. ICS-8506). California Univ San Diego La Jolla Inst for Cognitive Science
Schilling MA (2002) Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: the impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities. Acad Manag J 45(2):387–398
Schreurs S, Cleland J, Muijtjens AM, Oude Egbrink MG, Cleutjens K (2018) Does selection pay off? A cost–benefit comparison of medical school selection and lottery systems. Med Educ 52(12):1240–1248
Schwartz B (2004) The paradox of choice: Why more is less. Ecco, New York
Shrestha YR, Ben-Menahem SM, Von Krogh G (2019) Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. Calif Manage Rev 61(4):66–83
Siggelkow N, Rivkin JW (2005) Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ Sci 16(2):101–122
Silver N (2012) The signal and the noise: why so many predictions fail–but some don’t. Penguin
Simon HA (1947) Administrative behavior. Simon and Schuster
Smaldino PE, Turner MA, Contreras Kallens PA (2019) Open science and modified funding lotteries can impede the natural selection of bad science. Royal Soc Open Sci 6(7):190194
Spinoza B (1677) Ethics. Book 2. Proposition 49
Tetlock PE, Gardner D (2016) Superforecasting: the art and science of prediction. Random House
Tolstoy L (1877) Anna Karenina
Tushman ML, Nadler DA (1978) Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Acad Manag Rev 3(3):613–624
Van Maanen L, Grasman RP, Forstmann BU, Wagenmakers EJ (2012) Piéron’s law and optimal behavior in perceptual decision-making. Front Neurosci 5:143
Zellweger TM, Zenger TR (2021) Entrepreneurs as scientists: a pragmatist approach to producing value out of uncertainty. Acad Manag Rev
Zuboff S (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile books