On the interaction of observation and prior error correlations in data assimilation

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society - Tập 144 Số 710 - Trang 48-62 - 2018
Alison Fowler1,2, Sarah L. Dance2, Joanne A. Waller2
1National Centre for Earth Observation, University of Reading, UK
2School of Mathematical, Physical and Computational Sciences, University of Reading, UK

Tóm tắt

The importance of prior error correlations in data assimilation has long been known; however, observation‐error correlations have typically been neglected. Recent progress has been made in estimating and accounting for observation‐error correlations, allowing for the optimal use of denser observations. Given this progress, it is now timely to ask how prior and observation‐error correlations interact and how this affects the value of the observations in the analysis. Addressing this question is essential to understanding the optimal design of future observation networks for high‐resolution numerical weather prediction. This article presents new results, which unify and advance upon previous studies on this topic.The interaction of the prior and observation‐error correlations is illustrated with a series of two‐variable experiments in which the mapping between the state and observed variables (the observation operator) is allowed to vary. In an optimal system, the reduction in the analysis‐error variance and spread of information is shown to be greatest when the observation and prior errors have complementary statistics: for example, in the case of direct observations, when the correlations between the observation and prior errors have opposite signs. This can be explained in terms of the relative uncertainty of the observations and prior on different spatial scales. The results from these simple two‐variable experiments are used to inform the optimal observation density for observations of a circular domain (with 32 grid points). It is found that dense observations are most beneficial when they provide a more accurate estimate of the state at smaller scales than the prior estimate. In the case of second‐order auto‐regressive correlation functions, this is achieved when the length‐scales of the observation‐error correlations are greater than those of the prior estimate and the observations are direct measurements of the state variables.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/qj.339

10.1002/qj.340

BergerH ForsytheM.2004.‘Satellite wind superobbing’. Met Office Forecasting Research Technical Report 451.http://research.metoffice.gov.uk/research/nwp/publications/papers/technical_reports/2004/FRTR451/FRTR451.pdf.

10.1175/1520-0493(1976)104<1308:AEAAFO>2.0.CO;2

10.1002/qj.616

10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0706:TSSOOE>2.0.CO;2

Bormann N, 2016, Enhancing the impact of IASI observations through an updated observation‐error covariance matrix, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 1420, 1767, 10.1002/qj.2774

Browne PA, 2014, RMetS Special Interest Group Meeting: High resolution data assimilation, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 150, 354, 10.1002/asl2.512

10.1175/MWR-D-16-0240.1

10.1256/qj.03.205

10.1002/qj.178

10.1002/qj.2925

Daley R, 1996, Atmospheric Data Analysis

10.1002/qj.175

Desroziers G, 2005, Diagnosis of observation, background and analysis‐error statistics in observation space, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 1310, 3385, 10.1256/qj.05.108

Eresmaa R, 2014, ‘Implications of observation‐error correlation on the assimilation of interferometric radiances’

10.1175/MWR-D-16-0069.1

Gray R, 2006, Chapter in ‘Foundations and Trends in Communications and Information Theory 2’, 155

HiltonF CollardA GuidardV RandriamampianinaR SchwaerzM.2009.Assimilation of IASI radiances at European NWP centres. In Proceedings of Workshop on the Assimilation of IASI Data in NWP 6–8 May 2009. ECMWF Reading UK.

10.3402/tellusa.v67.24822

Hodyss D, 2017, The Treatment, Estimation, and Issues with Representation Error Modelling, 10.1007/978-3-319-43415-5_8

10.1002/qj.49712757112

10.1175/MWR-D-14-00104.1

10.1175/MWR3229.1

Janjic T, 2017, On the representation error, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.

Kalnay E, 2003, Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability

Lean HW, 2008, Characteristics of high‐resolution versions of the met office unified model for forecasting convection over the united kingdom, Mon. Weather Rev., 1360, 3408, 10.1175/2008MWR2332.1

10.1256/003590002320373337

10.1256/qj.02.170

Miyoshi T, 2013, Estimating and including observation‐error correlations in data assimilation, Inverse Prob. Sci. Eng., 210, 387, 10.1080/17415977.2012.712527

Pahl PJ, 2012, Mathematical Foundations of Computational Engineering: A Handbook

Pozrikidis C, 2014, An Introduction to Grids, Graphs and Networks

10.1002/qj.49712656415

10.1256/0035900021643638

10.1002/qj.2582

10.1002/qj.32

10.1142/3171

10.1175/1520-0493(1977)105<1211:AADAOA>2.0.CO;2

10.1002/qj.2298

Stewart LM, 2008, Correlated observation errors in data assimilation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 560, 1521, 10.1002/fld.1636

10.3402/tellusa.v65i0.19546

10.1002/qj.2211

Sun J, 2014, Use of NWP for nowcasting convective precipitation: Recent progress and challenges, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 950, 409, 10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00263.1

10.2151/sola.2014-044

van Leeuwen PJ, 2015, Representation errors and retrievals in linear and nonlinear data assimilation, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 141, 612, 10.1002/qj.2464

10.1002/qj.2280

10.3402/tellusa.v66.23294

10.1002/qj.2207

10.3390/rs8070581

10.1002/qj.2661

10.1175/MWR-D-15-0340.1

10.1002/qj.2306

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society

Tập 144 Số 710

48-62

Thông tin tác giả