On Pettit’s thought ascription to groups
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227–287.
Evans, G. (1982). The varieties of reference. Oxford University Press.
Frege, G. (1892). On Sinn und Bedeutung. In: Beaney, M. (Ed.), The Frege Reader. Blackwell.
Gilbert, M. (1990). Walking together: A paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, 15(1), 1–14.
Horgan, T. & Tienson, J. (2002). The intentionality of phenomenology and the phenomenology of intentionality. In D. J. Chalmers (Ed.), Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings (pp. 520–532). Oxford University Press.
Layton, P. (2017). The battle for Southeast Asia’s soul. The Interpreter. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/battle-southeast-asia-s-soul
List, C., & Pettit, P. (2011). Group agency: The possibility, design, and status of corporate agents. Oxford University Press.
Louw, D.J. (1998). “Ubuntu: An African Assessment of the Religious Other”. Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy. Retrieved January 10, 2018, from https://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Afri/AfriLouw.htm
Ludwig, K. (2017). Do corporations have minds of their own? Philosophical Psychology, 30(3), 269–301.
Magistad, M.K. (2016). Southeast Asia hopes a new common market will give it clout, but it may have a weak link in Thailand. The World. Retrived February 12, 2018 from https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-04-22/southeast-asia-hopes-new-common-market-will-give-it-clout-it-may-have-weak-link
McDowell, J. (1998) Singular thought and the extent of inner space. In Meaning, knowledge and reality. Harvard University Press.
Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press.
Pettit, P. (2001). Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma. Philosophical Issues, 11, 268–299.
Pettit, P. (2003). Groups with minds of their own. In F. Schmitt (Ed.), Socializing Metaphysics (pp. 167–193). Rowman and Littlefield.
Pettit, P. (2009). The reality of group agents. In C. Mantzavinos (Ed.), Philosophy of the social sciences: Philosophical theory and scientific practice (pp. 67–91). Cambridge University Press.
Pettit, P. (2014). Group agents are not expressive, pragmatic or theoretical fictions. Erkenntnis, 79(9), 1641–1662.
Pettit, P., & List, C. (2006). Group agency and supervenience. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 44, 85–105.
Roth, A. S. (2017). Shared agency. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved February 10, 2018, from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/shared-agency/
Salama, V. & Kube, C. (2017). U.S. to allies: The U.S. believes in diplomacy, despite Trump’s words. Retrieved February 10, 2018 from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/north-korea/u-s-allies-u-s-believes-diplomacy-despite-trump-s-n803056
Shoemaker, S. (1968). Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy, 65(October), 555–67.
Thistlethwaite, S. B. (2004). Can a nation lose its soul? Coming to term with the conscience of the United States and the torture of Iraqi prisoners. Chicago Tribune.
Townsend, L. (2020). Groups with minds of their own making. Journal of Social Philosophy, 51(1), 129–151.
Tuomela, R. (2013). Social ontology: Collective intentionality and group agents. Oxford University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical Investigations. In P. M. S. Hacker & Joachim Schulte (Eds.), Translated by GEM Anscombe, PMS Hacker and Joachim Schulte. Wiley.
