Observational Learning and Its Effects on the Orchestration of Writing Processes
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Alamargot, D. & Chanquoy, L. (2001). Nature and control of processing. In G. Rijlaarsdam (Series Ed.), D. Alamargot, & L. Chanquoy (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing: Vol 9. Through the models of writing (pp. 125-154). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
Bereiter, C. & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Braaksma, M. A. H. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1997, August). Learning to write and read argumentative texts by observation. An explorative study on effective learning activities in observation tasks. Paper presented at the 7th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Athens, Greece.
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H. & van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M. (2001). Actual behavior in observation tasks. A case study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Breetvelt, I., van den Bergh, H. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). Rereading and generating and their relation to text quality. An application of multilevel analysis on writing process data. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models & methodology in writing research (pp. 10-21). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Couzijn, M. J. (1995). Observation of writing and reading activities. Effects on learning and transfer. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
DAT. (1984). Differentiele Aanleg Test [Differential Aptitude Test]. Lisse, The Netherlands: Zwets & Zeitlinger.
Goldstein, H. (1979). The design and analysis of longitudinal studies: Their role in the measurement of change. London: Academic.
Graham, S. & Harris, K. R. (1994). The role and development of self-regulation in the writing process. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 203-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Graham, S., Harris, K. R. & Troia, G. A. (1998). Writing and self-regulation: Cases from the self-regulated strategy development model. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning, from teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 20-41). New York: Guilford.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). Cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hayes, J. R. & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. W. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Hillocks, G. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, National Institute of Education.
Oostdam, R. (1991). Argumentatie in de peiling [Assessing argumentation]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Oostdam, R. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1995). Towards strategic language learning. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Rijlaarsdam, G. & van den Bergh, H. (1996). The dynamics of composing-An agenda for research into an interactive compensatory model of writing: Many questions, some answers. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 107-125). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1986). Research on written composition. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 778-803). New York: Collier Macmillan.
Schoonen, R. & De Glopper, K. (1996). Writing performance and knowledge about writing. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Theories, models & methodology in writing research (pp. 87-107). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Learning theories: An educational perspective. New York: Merrill.
van den Bergh, H. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1996). The dynamics of composing: Modeling writing process data. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 207-232). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
van den Bergh, H. & Rijlaarsdam, G. (1999). The dynamics of idea generation during writing: An online study. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Esperet (Series Eds.), M. Torrance, & D. Galbraith (Vol. Eds.), Studies in writing: Vol. 3. Knowing what to write: Cognitive perspectives on conceptual processes in text production (pp. 99-120). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G. & Breetvelt, I. (1994). Revision process and text quality: An empirical study. In G. Eigler & T. Jechle (Eds.), Writing: Current trends in European research (p. 133-148). Freiburg, Germany: Hochschul Verlag.
van der Hoeven, J. (1997). Children's composing. A study into the relationships between writing processes, text quality, and cognitive and linguistic skills. Amsterdam: Atlanta.
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1983). Argumentatieleer 1. Het analyseren van een betoog [A course in argumentation 1. Analyzing argumentative text]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Wolters-Noordhoff.
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication, and fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
van Eemeren, F. H. & Grootendorst, R. (2000). From analysis to presentation: A pragma-dialectal approach to writing argumentative texts. In G. Rijlaarsdam & E. Esperet (Series Eds.) & J. Andriessen & P. Coirier (Vol. Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 5. Foundation of argumentative text processing (pp. 59-74). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.