Obliterating Thingness: An Introduction to the “What” and the “So What” of Quantum Physics

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 26 - Trang 7-26 - 2019
Kathryn Schaffer1, Gabriela Barreto Lemos2,3
1School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago, USA
2International Institute of Physics, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil
3University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, USA

Tóm tắt

This essay provides a short introduction to the ideas and potential implications of quantum physics for scholars in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. Quantum-inspired ideas pepper current discourse in all of these fields, in ways that range from playful metaphors to sweeping ontological claims. We explain several of the most important concepts at the core of quantum theory, carefully delineating the scope and bounds of currently established science, in order to aid the evaluation of such claims. In particular, we emphasize that the smallest units of matter and light, as described in quantum physics, are not things, meaning that they do not obey the logic we take for granted when discussing the behavior of macroscopic objects. We also highlight the substantial debate that exists within physics about the interpretation of the equations and empirical results at the core of quantum physics, noting that implicit (and contested) philosophical commitments necessarily accompany any discussion of quantum ideas that takes place in non-technical language.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aharonov, Y., & Vaidman, L. (2008). The two-state vector formalism of quantum mechanics: An updated review. In J. G. Muga, R. S. Mayato, & Í. Egusquiza (Eds.), Time in quantum mechanics, Lecture Notes in Physics (Vol. 734, pp. 399–447). Springer: Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73473-4_13.

Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

Barrett, J., Kent, A., Saunders, S., & Wallace, D. (2010). Many worlds? Everett, quantum theory, and reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bitbol, M. (2007). Physical relations or functional relations? A non-metaphysical construal of Rovelli’s relational quantum mechanics. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/3506. Accessed 22 May 2019.

Brukner, Č., & Zeilinger, A. (2009). Information invariance and quantum probabilities. Foundations of Physics, 39, 677–689.

Bub, J. (2005). Quantum mechanics is about quantum information. Foundations of Physics, 35, 541–560.

Durr, D., & Teufel, S. (2017). Bohmian mechanics: The physics and mathematics of quantum theory. Berlin: Springer.

Faye, J., & Folse, H. J. (1994). Niels Bohr and contemporary philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer.

Freire, O, Jr., Pessoa, O, Jr., & Bromberg, J. L. (2011). Teoria quântica: estudos históricos e implicações culturais. Campina Grande/Sao Paulo: EDUEPB/Livraria da Física.

Fuchs, C. A. (2017). Notwithstanding Bohr, the reasons for QBism. https://arXiv.org/abs/1705.03483v1.

Ghirardi, G. (2016). Collapse theories. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/qm-collapse/. Accessed 22 May 2019.

Goldstein, S. (2009). Bohmian mechanics. In The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/qm-bohm/.

Griffiths, R. B. (2017). The consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/qm-consistent-histories/. Accessed 22 May 2019.

Kwiat, P., & Hardy, L. (2000). The mystery of quantum cakes. American Journal of Physics, 68, 33.

Laudisa, F., & Rovelli, C. (2013). Relational quantum mechanics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/qm-relational/. Accessed 22 May 2019.

Leifer, M., & Pusey, M. (2017). Is a time symmetric interpretation of quantum theory possible without retrocausality? Proceedings of Royal Society A, 473, 20160607.

Lewis, P. (2016). Quantum ontology: A guide to the metaphysics of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Liang, Y.-C., Spekkens, R. W., & Wiseman, H. M. (2011). Specker’s parable of the overprotective seer: A road to contextuality, nonlocality and complementarity. Physics Reports, 506(1–2), 1–39.

Orrell, D. (2018). Quantum economics: The new science of money. London: Icon Books.

Schlosshauer, M. (2011). Elegance and enigma: The quantum interviews. Berlin: Springer.

Wendt, A. (2015). Quantum mind and social science: Unifying physical and social ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wharton, K. B. (2007). Time-symmetric quantum mechanics. Foundations of Physics, 37(1), 159–168.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Tập 26

7-26

Thông tin tác giả