Objectification in Action

Psychology of Women Quarterly - Tập 40 Số 2 - Trang 213-228 - 2016
Randi L. Garcia1,2, Valerie A. Earnshaw3,2, Diane M. Quinn2
1Department of Psychology; Clark University; Worcester MA USA
2Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA
3Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Tóm tắt

Although the process of sexual objectification is theorized to occur within interpersonal interactions, we believe this is the first study to examine sexual objectification and self-objectification in actual (nonconfederate) interpersonal encounters. Men and women were brought into the laboratory and interacted in mixed-sex dyads. We used dyadic analysis to detect whether partners’ objectification of each other affected state self-objectification, and the resulting feelings of comfort and authenticity during the interaction. After the interaction, participants completed a cognitive performance task, a measure of career aspirations, and a measure of relationship agency. Results showed that for women only, being objectified by their male interaction partner was associated with an increase in state self-objectification, and state self-objectification led to perceptions that the interaction was less comfortable and less authentic. Furthermore, for women but not for men, having authentic interactions was found to relate positively to relationship agency, career aspirations, and cognitive performance. This research shows that self-objectification is not only a self-process but an interpersonal process heightened by the real-time sexual objectification of a male interaction partner. Online slides for instructors who want to use this article for teaching are available to PWQ subscribers on PWQ's website at http://pwq.sagepub.com/supplemental

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Arbuckle J. L. (2012). Amos 21 [Computer software]. Meadville, PA: Amos Development Corporation.

10.1007/s11199-006-9070-7

10.1080/15205430709337002

10.1177/0146167207313727

10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00450.x

10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00118.x

10.1037/12304-001

10.1177/0361684315604820

10.1177/014616702237644

10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276

10.1037/0033-295X.94.3.369

10.1007/s11211-008-0073-0

10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x

10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269

10.1002/ejsp.731

10.1177/0361684310386121

10.1177/1069072707301211

10.1123/jsep.11.1.94

10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_4

10.1177/0146167204264052

10.1177/0011000007301669

10.1007/s10508-005-9016-0

Kenny D. A., 2006, Analysis of dyadic data

10.1177/0265407512452990

10.1037/a0015703

10.1123/jsep.19.4.359

10.1177/0146167206297403

10.1207/s15324834basp0503_5

10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x

10.1177/0265407502196006

10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00181.x

10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.127

10.1037/12304-006

10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00262.x

10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.80

10.1177/0956797609357751

10.1007/s11199-008-9451-1

10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38003-3

10.1177/0146167205274894

10.1177/0361684314554606

10.1016/S0065-2601(02)80009-0

10.1037/a0033947

10.1007/s11199-005-3737-3

10.1177/0361684314565345

10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00265.x

10.1177/0146167207311199

10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4