Object Concepts and Their Functional Core: Material Engagement and Canonical Uses of Objects in Early Childhood Education

Alessandroni, N., & Malafouris, L. (2020). The materiality of concepts: From material engagement to conceptual thinging. Manuscript in preparation.

Alessandroni, N., & Rodríguez, C. (2017). Is CONTAINER a natural and embodied image schema? A developmental, pragmatic, and cultural proposal. Human Development, 60(4), 144–178. https://doi.org/10.1159/000478841.

Alessandroni, N., & Rodríguez, C. (2019). The development of categorization and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Alessandroni, N., & Rodríguez, C. (in press). On perception as the basis for object concepts: a critical analysis. Pragmatics & Cognition.

Alessandroni, N., Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2019). Musical dynamics in early triadic interactions. A case study. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01168-4.

Amin, T. G., & Levrini, O. (Eds.). (2018). Converging perspectives on conceptual change. Mapping an emerging paradigm in the learning sciences. Routledge.

Anderson, A., & Prawat, R. S. (1983). When is a cup not a cup? A further examination of form and function in children’s labeling responses. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 4, 375–385.

Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E. S., & Wasserman, S. (1985). Object permanence in five-month-old infants. Cognition, 20(3), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90008-3.

Baquero, R. (1996). Vigotsky y el aprendizaje escolar. Aique.

Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170144. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0144.

Barthes, R. (1985/1994). Semantics of the object. In R. Howard (Trans.), The semiotic challenge (pp. 179–190). University of California Press.

Basilio, M., & Rodríguez, C. (2017). How toddlers think with their hands: Social and private gestures as evidence of cognitive self-regulation in guided play with objects. Early Child Development and Care, 187(12), 1971–1986. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1202944.

Behl-Chadha, G. (1996). Basic-level and superordinate-like categorical representations in early infancy. Cognition, 60(2), 105–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00706-8.

Berger, C. (1997). Catégorisation, formation de concepts et induction: Rôle des informations perceptives et conceptuelles chez le jeune enfant. L’Année Psychologique, 97(3), 495–517. https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.1997.28972.

Blomberg, O. (2018). Practical knowledge and acting together. In J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Socially extended epistemology (pp. 87–111). Oxford University Press.

Bomba, P. C., & Siqueland, E. R. (1983). The nature and structure of infant form categories. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 35(2), 294–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(83)90085-1.

Bornstein, M. H., & Arterberry, M. E. (2010). The development of object categorization in young children: hierarchical inclusiveness, age, perceptual attribute, and group versus individual analyses. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018411.

Brinck, I., Reddy, V., & Zahavi, D. (2017). The primacy of the ‘we’? In C. Durt, T. Fuchs, & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment, enaction, and culture (pp. 131–148). The MIT Press.

Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956/2009). A study of thinking. Transaction Publishers.

Byers, P. (2016). Knowledge claims in cognitive development research: problems and alternatives. New Ideas in Psychology, 43, 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.03.004.

Casasola, M., & Ahn, Y. A. (2018). What develops in infants’ spatial categorization? Korean infants’ categorization of containment and tight-fit relations. Child Development, 89(4), e382–e396. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12903.

Chaigneau, S., & Barsalou, L. W. (2008). The role of function in categories. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, 8(1), 33–49.

Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind. Oxford University Press.

Cohen, L. B., & Strauss, M. S. (1979). Concept acquisition in the human infant. Child Development, 50(2), 419–424. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129417.

Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: where culture and cognition create each other. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, comunication, and cognition: Vygotskian approaches (pp. 146–161). Cambridge University Press.

Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions (pp. 1–46). Cambridge University Press.

Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. (1996). Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussion of Piaget and Vygotsky. Human Development, 39, 250–256.

Costall, A. (2012). Canonical affordances in context. Avant, 3(2), 85–93.

Cuccio, V., & Gallese, V. (2018). A Peircean account of concepts: grounding abstraction in phylogeny through a comparative neuroscientific perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170128. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0128.

Díaz Escribano, M. (2019). The philosophy of affordances. Palgrave Macmillan.

Durt, C., Fuchs, T., & Tewes, C. (Eds.). (2017). Embodiment, enaction, and culture. The MIT Press.

Eimas, P. D., & Quinn, P. C. (1994). Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Development, 65(3), 903–917. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00792.x.

Ellis, A. E., & Oakes, L. M. (2006). Infants flexibly use different dimensions to categorize objects. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1000–1011. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.6.1000.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: an activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.

Estrada, L. (2019). Materialidad y prácticas educativas en la Escuela Infantil con niños entre 1–-2 años: Una aproximación cultural, semiótica y pragmática (Ph.D. Dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid). Retrieved from https://repositorio.uam.es/handle/10486/688559

Fagan, J. F. (1976). Infants’ recognition of invariant features of faces. Child Development, 47(3), 627–638. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128177.

Ferry, A. L., Hespos, S. J., & Waxman, S. R. (2010). Categorization in 3- and 4-month-old infants: an advantage of words over tones. Child Development, 81(2), 472–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01408.x.

Gabora, L., Rosch, E., & Aerts, D. (2008). Toward an ecological theory of concepts. Ecological Psychology, 20(1), 84–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407410701766676.

Gallagher, S. (2017). Enactivist interventions. Oxford University Press.

Gergen, K. J. (2003). Self and community in the new floating worlds. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), Communication in the 21st century: Essays on society, self and politics (pp. 103–114). Passagen Verlag.

Gibson, J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Houghton Mifflin.

Gibson, J. (1979/2015). The ecological approach to visual perception. Psychology Press.

Greco, C., Hayne, H., & Rovee-Collier, C. (1990). Roles of function, reminding, and variability in categorization by 3-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16(4), 617–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.617.

Gruber, C. W., Clark, M. G., Hroar Klempe, S., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2015). Constraints of agency: explorations of theory in everyday life. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10130-9.

Harnad, S. (2005). To cognize is to categorize: cognition is categorization. In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (1st ed., pp. 19–44). Elsevier https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044612-7/50056-1.

Hayne, H., Rovee-Collier, C., & Perris, E. E. (1987). Categorization and memory retrieval by three-month-olds. Child Development, 58(3), 750. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130212.

Hetherington, S. (2011). How to know. A practicalist conception of knowledge. Wiley-Blackwell.

James, W. (1900). Psychology. Henry Holt and Company.

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1996). Beyond modularity. A developmental perspective on cognitive science. The MIT Press.

Kemler Nelson, D. G. (1990). When experimental findings conflict with everyday observations: reflections on children’s category learning. Child Development, 61(3), 606–610.

Klausmeier, H. J., & Allen, P. S. (1978). Cognitive development of children and youth: a longitudinal study. Academic Press.

Lakoff, G. (1990). Women, fire and dangerous things. University of Chicago Press.

Lausberg, H., & Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 41(3), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.841.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991/2008). Situated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Le Groupe µ., Édeline, F., & Klinkenberg, J. (2013). Sémiotique de l’outil. Anasémiose et catasémiose instrumentées. Signata. Annales des Sémiotiques, 4, 409–436. https://doi.org/10.4000/signata.1029.

Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). The problem of activity in psychology. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 37–71). Sharpe.

Locke, J. (1690/1998). An essay concerning human understanding (2nd ed.). Penguin.

Malafouris, L. (2004). The cognitive bases of material engagement: where brain, body and culture conflate. In E. DeMarrais, C. Gosden, & C. Renfrew (Eds.), Rethinking materiality: the engagement of mind with the material world (pp. 53–62). McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.

Malafouris, L. (2008a). Between brains, bodies and things: tectonoetic awareness and the extended self. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1499), 1993–2002. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0014.

Malafouris, L. (2008b). At the potter’s wheel: an argument for material agency. In C. Knappett & L. Malafouris (Eds.), Material agency: towards a non-anthropocentric approach (pp. 19–37). Springer.

Malafouris, L. (2010). Grasping the concept of number: how did the sapient mind move beyond approximation? In I. Morley & C. Renfrew (Eds.), The archaeology of measurement (pp. 35–42). Cambridge University Press.

Malafouris, L. (2013). How things shape the mind. A theory of material engagement. The MIT Press.

Malafouris, L. (2014). Creative thinging: the feeling of and for clay. Pragmatics & Cognition, 22(1), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.1.08mal.

Malafouris, L. (2015). Metaplasticity and the primacy of material engagement. Time and Mind, 8(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/1751696X.2015.1111564.

Malafouris, L. (2016). On human becoming and incompleteness: a material engagement approach to the study of embodiment in evolution and culture. In G. Etzelmüller & C. Tewes (Eds.), Embodiment in evolution and culture (pp. 289–306). Mohr Siebeck.

Malafouris, L. (2017). Material engagement and the embodied mind. In T. Wynn & F. L. Coolidge (Eds.), Cognitive models in Palaeolithic archaeology (pp. 69–88). Oxford University Press.

Malafouris, L. (2019a). Mind and material engagement. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9606-7.

Malafouris, L. (2019b). Thinking as “thinging”: psychology with things. Current Directions in Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419873349.

Malafouris, L., & Koukouti, M. D. (2018). How the body remembers its skills. Memory and material engagement. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 25(7–8), 158–180.

Mandler, J. M., & Bauer, P. J. (1988). The cradle of categorization: is the basic level basic? Cognitive Development, 3(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-2014(88)90011-1.

Mandler, J. M., & McDonough, L. (1998). Studies in inductive inference in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 37(1), 60–96. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0691.

Mandler, J. M., Fivush, R., & Reznick, J. S. (1987). The development of contextual categories. Cognitive Development, 2(4), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(87)80012-6.

Mareschal, D., & Quinn, P. C. (2001). Categorization in infancy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(10), 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01752-6.

Melser, D. (2004). The act of thinking. The MIT Press.

Millikan, R. G. (2000). On clear and confused ideas. An essay about substance concepts. Cambridge University Press.

Moreno-Núñez, A., Rodríguez, C., & Del Olmo, M. J. (2017). Rhythmic ostensive gestures: how adults facilitate infants’ entrance into early triadic interactions. Infant Behavior and Development, 49, 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.09.003.

Moro, C. (2014). Le référent dans l’intersubjectivité secondaire: Un objet aussi ignoré que ‘l’autre face de la lune’? In C. Moro, N. Muller Mirza, & P. Roman (Eds.), L’intersubjectivité en questions. Agrégat ou nouveau concept fédérateur pour la psychologie? (pp. 69–106). Antipodes.

Moro, C. (2015). Material culture: Still ‘terra incognita’ for psychology today? Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 172–176. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i2.995.

Moro, C., & Rodríguez, C. (2005). L’objet et la construction de son usage chez le bébé: Une approche sémiotique du développement préverbal. Peter Lang.

Murphy, G. L. (2002). The big book of concepts. The MIT Press.

Nelson, K. (1973). Some evidence for the cognitive primacy of categorization and its functional basis. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 19(1), 21–39.

Nelson, K. (1983). Concepts, words, and experiments: Comment on “When is a cup not a cup?” by Anderson and Prawat. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 29(4), 387–394.

Nelson, K. (1985). Making sense. Academic.

Noë, A. (2005). Against intellectualism. Analysis, 65(4), 278–290.

O’Madagain, C. (2018). Outsourcing concepts. Social externalism, the extended mind, and the expansion of our epistemic capacity. In J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Socially extended epistemology (pp. 24–35). Oxford University Press.

Oakes, L. M. (2008). Categorization skills and concepts. In M. M. Haith & J. B. Benson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of infant and early childhood development (pp. 249–259). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012370877-9.00043-8.

Oakes, L. M., & Rakison, D. H. (2003). Issues in the early development of concepts and categories. In D. H. Rakison & L. M. Oakes (Eds.), Early category and concept development (pp. 3–23). Oxford University Press.

Overmann, K. A., & Malafouris, L. (2018). Situated cognition. In H. Callan (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology (pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2201.

Palermos, S. O., & Tollefsen, D. P. (2018). Group know-how. In J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S. O. Palermos, & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Socially extended epistemology (pp. 112–131). Oxford University Press.

Park, Y., & Casasola, M. (2015). Plain or decorated? Object visual features matter in infant spatial categorization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 140, 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.002.

Pauen, S. (2002). Evidence for knowledge-based category discrimination in infancy. Child Development, 73(4), 1016–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00454.

Pauen, S., Birgit, T., Hoehl, S., & Bechtel, S. (2015). Show me the world: Object categorization and socially guided object learning in infancy. Child Development Perspectives, 9(2), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12119.

Peirce, C. S. (1907/1998). Pragmatism. In N. Houser (Ed.), The essential Peirce. Volume 2 (1893–-1913) (pp. 398–433). Indiana University Press.

Piaget, J. (1937/2000). The construction of reality in the child. Routledge.

Piaget, J. (1951/1999). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. Routledge.

Poulin-Dubois, D., & Pauen, S. (2017). The development of object categories: what, when, and how? In H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of categorization in cognitive science (2nd ed., pp. 653–671). Elsevier.

Preucel, R. W. (2006). Archaeological semiotics. Blackwell Publishing.

Prior, J., & van Herwegen, J. (2016). Practical research with children. Psychology Press.

Quinn, P. C. (2004). Development of subordinate-level categorization in 3- to 7-month-old infants. Child Development, 75(3), 886–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00712.x.

Quinn, P. C., & Eimas, P. D. (1996). Perceptual cues that permit categorical differentiation of animal species by infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63(1), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0047.

Quinn, P. C., & Johnson, M. H. (2000). Global-before-basic object categorization in connectionist networks and 2-month-old infants. Infancy, 1(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0101_04.

Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D., & Rosenkrantz, S. L. (1993). Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 22(4), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1068/p220463.

Rakison, D. H., & Yermolayeva, Y. (2010). Infant categorization. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 894–905. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.81.

Reddy, V. (1991). Playing with others’ expectations: teasing and mucking about in the first year. In A. Withen (Ed.), Natural theories of mind (pp. 143–158). Blackwell.

Reddy, V. (2008). How infants know minds. Harvard University Press.

Reddy, V., & Mireault, G. (2015). Teasing and clowning in infancy. Current Biology, 25(1), R20–R23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.021.

Ribot, T. (1899). The evolution of general ideas. The Open Court Publishing Company.

Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2014). A rich landscape of affordances. Ecological Psychology, 26(4), 325–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407413.2014.958035.

Rodríguez, C. (2006). Del ritmo al símbolo. Los signos en el nacimiento de la inteligencia. Horsori.

Rodríguez, C. (2007). Object use, communication, and signs: the triadic basis of early cognitive development. In J. Valsiner & A. Rosa (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of sociocultural psychology (pp. 257–276). Cambridge University Press.

Rodríguez, C. (2012). The functional permanence of the object: a product of consensus. In E. Martí & C. Rodríguez (Eds.), After Piaget (pp. 123–150). Transaction Publishers.

Rodríguez, C. (2015). The connection between language and the world: a paradox of the linguistic turn? Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-014-9274-2.

Rodríguez, C., & Moro, C. (1998). El uso convencional también hace permanentes a los objetos. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 84, 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1174/021037098760378793.

Rodríguez, C., & Moro, C. (1999). El mágico número tres. Cuando los niños aún no hablan. Paidós.

Rodríguez, C., & Moro, C. (2008). Coming to agreement: object use by infants and adults. In J. Zlatev, T. P. Racine, C. Sinha, & E. Itkonen (Eds.), The shared mind (pp. 89–114) John Benjamins.

Rodríguez, C., & Palacios, P. (2007). Do private gestures have a self-regulatory function? A case study. Infant Behavior and Development, 30(2), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.02.010.

Rodríguez, C., Benassi, J., Estrada, L., & Alessandroni, N. (2017). Early social interactions with people and objects. In A. Slater & G. Bremner (Eds.), An introduction to developmental psychology (3rd ed., pp. 213–258). Wiley.

Rodríguez, C., Basilio, M., Cárdenas, K., Cavalcante, S., Moreno-Núñez, A., Palacios, P., & Yuste, N. (2018). Object pragmatics: culture and communication, the bases for early cognitive development. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of socio-cultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 223–244). Cambridge University Press.

Rolla, G. (2019). Reconceiving rationality: situating rationality into radically enactive cognition. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02362-y.

Rosch, E. (1999). Reclaiming concepts. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(11–12), 61–77.

Ross, B. H. (1997). The use of categories affects classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(2), 240–267. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2515.

Ruba, A. L., Johnson, K. M., Harris, L. T., & Wilbourn, M. P. (2017). Developmental changes in infants’ categorization of anger and disgust facial expressions. Developmental Psychology, 53(10), 1826–1832. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000381.

Ruff, H. A. (1978). Infant recognition of the invariant form of objects. Child Development, 49(2), 293–306. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128690.

Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Hutchinson House.

Saffran, J. R., Pollak, S. D., Seibel, R. L., & Shkolnik, A. (2007). Dog is a dog is a dog: infant rule learning is not specific to language. Cognition, 105(3), 669–680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2006.11.004.

Sakharov, L. S. (1990). Methods for investigating concepts. Soviet Psychology, 28(4), 35–66.

Säljö, R. (2018). Conceptual change, materiality and hybrid minds. In T. G. Amin & O. Levrini (Eds.), Converging perspectives on conceptual change. Mapping an emerging paradigm in the learning sciences (pp. 113–120). Routledge.

Schlesinger, I. M. (1982). Steps to language: toward a theory of native language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schmuckler, M. A. (2001). What is ecological validity? A dimensional analysis. Infancy, 2(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327078IN0204_02.

Schwitzgebel, E. (2013). A dispositional approach to attitudes: thinking outside of the belief box. In N. Nottelmann (Ed.), New essays on belief (pp. 75–99). Palgrave Macmillan.

Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2003). Research methods in psychology (9th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Smith, E. E., & Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Harvard University Press.

Spelke, E. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1233–1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1233.

Stavans, M., & Baillargeon, R. (2018). Four-month-old infants individuate and track simple tools following functional demonstrations. Developmental Science, 21(1), e12500. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12500.

Striano, T., & Stahl, D. (2005). Sensitivity to triadic attention in early infancy. Developmental Science, 8(4), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00421.x.

Tapparel, S. (2014). Se développer en situation éducative dans une institution de la petite enfance: Le rôle de l’objet matériel en situation peinture. In C. Moro & N. Muller Mirza (Eds.), Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique (pp. 141–158). Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.

Tilley, C. (2006). Objectification. In C. Tilley, W. Keane, S. Küchler, M. Rowlands, & P. Spyer (Eds.), Handbook of material culture (pp. 60–73). SAGE.

Toulmin, S. (1999). Knowledge as shared procedures. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki-Gitai (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 53–64). Cambridge University Press.

Vaesen, K. (2012). From individual cognition to populational culture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(4), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11002196.

Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. SAGE.

Vega Encabo, J. (2010). Los saberes de Odiseo. Una filosofía de la técnica. EUdeBA.

von Uexküll, J. (1928). Theoretische Biologie. Springer-Verlag.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1930/1998). Pedology of the adolescent. In R. W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (1896–-1934). Volume 5: Child psychology (pp. 3–186). Springer.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1934/2008). Thought and language. The MIT Press.

Wallon, H. (1942/1970). De l’acte à la pensée. Flammarion.

Wallon, H., & Ascoli, G. (1950). Comment l’enfant sait classer les objets. Enfance, 3(1), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.3406/enfan.1950.2196.

Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2009). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte, Trans). Wiley-Blackwell.