Numeracy task design: a case of changing mathematics teaching practice

Ball, D. L. (2002). What do we believe about teacher learning and how can we learn with and from our beliefs? In D. S. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. Y. White, H. G. Wiegel, R. L. Bryant, & K. Nooney (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th international conference for psychology of mathematics education—North American chapter. Athens: Georgia. Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 2005(Fall), 14–46. Biedermann, H. (2014). (Educational) Psychological perspective on PISA and challenges in PISA. Presentation given at Workshop PISA—More Than Just a Survey? University of Bremen. Chapman, O. (2002). Belief structures and inservice high school mathematics teacher growth. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 177–194). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. London; Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Clandinin, D. J. (1992). Narrative and story in teacher education. In T. Russell & H. Munby (Eds.), Teachers and teaching from classroom to reflection (pp. 124–137). Bristol: Falmer. Cohen, P. C. (2001). The emergence of numeracy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. 23–30). The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation. Cooney, T. (1985). A beginning teacher’s view of problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(5), 324–336. Council of Australian Governments (2008). National numeracy review report. http://www.coag.gov.au/sites/default/files/national_numeracy_review.pdf. Cuban, L. (2001). Encouraging progressive pedagogy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy (pp. 23–30). The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation. Davis, B., & Simmt, E. (2006). Mathematics-for-teaching: an ongoing investigation of the mathematics that teachers (need to) know. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(3), 293–319. De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. In B. Madison & L. Steen (Eds.), Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges (pp. 75–89). Princeton: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines. Evans, J. (2000). Adults’ mathematical thinking and emotions: a study of numerate practices. London: Routledge Falmer. Fernandez, C., Llinares, S., & Valls, J. (2013). Primary school teachers ‘noticing of students’ mathematical thinking in problem solving. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(1 & 2), 441–468. Fosnot, C. (1989). Enquiring teachers, enquiring learners: a constructivist approach for teaching. New York: Teachers College Press. Goos, M., Geiger, V., & Dole, S. (2013). Designing rich numeracy tasks. In C. Margolinas (Ed.), Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (vol.1). London, UK: Oxford. Green, T. (1971). The activities of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill. Greer, B. (2004). The growth of mathematics through conceptual restructuring. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 541–548. Hill, H., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. (2008). Unpacking “pedagogical content knowledge”: conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. Hillyard, C. (2012). Comparative study of the numeracy education and writing across the curriculum movements: Ideas for future growth. Numeracy, 5(2) (article 2). Hoogland, K. (2003). Mathematical literacy and numeracy. Utrecht: APS, National Center for School Improvement. Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202. Jasper, B., & Taube, S. (2004). Action research of elementary teachers’ problem-solving skills before and after focused professional development. Teacher Education and Practice, 17(3), 299–310. Karaagac, K. & Threlfall, J. (2004). The tension between teacher beliefs and teacher practice: The impact of the work setting. In Proceedings of 28th annual conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 137–144). Kazemi, E. (2008). School development as a means of improving mathematics teaching and learning: Towards multidirectional analysis of learning across contexts. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education (pp. 209–230). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Lerman, S., & Zehetmeir, S. (2008). Face-to-face communities and networks of practicing mathematics teachers: Studies on their professional growth. In K. Krainer & T. Wood (Eds.), Participants in mathematics teacher education (pp. 133–153). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. Liljedahl, P. (2007). Reification: Explicating teachers’ tacit knowledge and beliefs. In Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Mathematical Views (MAVI). Gävle, Sweden. Liljedahl, P. (2009). Changing beliefs as changing perspective. In Proceedings of the 6th congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Lyon, France. Liljedahl, P. (2010). Noticing rapid and profound mathematics teacher change. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(5), 411–423. Liljedahl, P., Rolka, K., & Rösken, B. (2007). Affecting affect: The re-education of preservice teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning and teaching. In M. Strutchens & W. Martin (Eds.), 69th NCTM yearbook: The learning of mathematics (pp. 319–330). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Little, J. W., & Horn, I. S. (2007). ‘Normalizing’ problems of practice: Converging routine conversation into a resource for learning in professional communities. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth, and dilemmas (pp. 79–92). Berkshire: Open University Press. Lord, B. (1994). Teachers’ professional development: Critical colleagueship and the roles of professional communities. In N. Cobb (Ed.), The future of education: Perspectives on national standards in America (pp. 175–204). New York: The College Board. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Mathematics K to 12: Mathematics curriculum documents. (2008). British Columbia Ministry of Education. http://www.bced.gov.bc.ca/irp/subject.php?lang=en&subject=Mathematics. McAskill, B., Holmes, G., Francis-Pelton, L., & Watt, W. (2004). WNCP mathematics research project: Final report. Holdfast Consulting Inc. https://www.wncp.ca/media/39083/final_report.pdf. McClain, K. & Cobb, P. (2004). The critical role of institutional context in teacher development. In Proceedings of 28th annual conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 3, pp. 281–288). Middleton, J. A., Sawada, D., Judson, E., Bloom, I., & Turley, J. (2002). Relationships build reform: Treating classroom research as emergent systems. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 409–431). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. OECD. (2003). Literacy Skills for the world of tomorrow: further results from PISA 2000. OECD. Orrill, R. (2001). Mathematics, numeracy, and democracy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy (pp. xiii–xx). The Woodrow Wilson national Fellowship Foundation. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Piaget, J. (1968). Six Psychological Studies, Anita Tenzer (Trans.). New York: Vintage Books. Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing: Seeing through teachers’ eyes. New York: Routledge. Skott, J. (2001). The emerging practices of novice teachers: the roles of his school mathematics images. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 4(1), 3–28. South Africa Department of Education. (2003). National curriculum statement, Grades 10-12 (General): Mathematical Literacy. Pretoria: Department of Education. Steen, L. A. (2001). Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy. In L. A. Steen (Ed.), Mathematics and democracy (pp. 1–22). The Woodrow Wilson national Fellowship Foundation. Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press. Tirosh, D., & Tsamir, P. (2004). What can mathematics education gain from the conceptual change approach? And what can the conceptual change approach gain from its application to mathematics education? Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 535–540. Van Es, E. A. (2011). A framework for learning to notice student thinking. In M. G. Sherin, V. R. Jacobs, & R. A. Philipp (Eds.), Mathematics teacher noticing: seeing through teachers’ eyes (pp. 134–151). New York and London: Routledge. Van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 244–276. Vosniadou, S. (2006). Mathematics learning from a conceptual change point of view: Theoretical issues and educational implications. In J. Novotna, H. Moraova, M. Kratka, & N. Stehlikova (Eds.), Proceedings of 30th annual conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 1, pp. 163–165). Vosniadou, S., & Verschaffel, L. (2004). Extending the conceptual change approach to mathematics learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 15(4), 445–451. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York: Cambridge University Press. Wiest, L., Higgins, H., & Frost, J. (2007). Quantitative literacy for social justice. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40(1), 47–55. Wilson, S., & Cooney, T. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development: The role of beliefs. In G. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.), Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education (pp. 127–148). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing.