Number of books at home as an indicator of socioeconomic status: Examining its extensions and their incremental validity for academic achievement

Social Psychology of Education - Tập 25 - Trang 903-928 - 2022
Birgit Heppt1, Melanie Olczyk2, Anna Volodina3
1Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2Institute of Sociology, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
3University of Bamberg, Bamberg, Germany

Tóm tắt

The present study investigates the incremental validity of the traditional books-at-home measure and selected extensions (i.e., number of children’s books and number of ebooks) for explaining students’ academic achievement as measured by their academic language comprehension. Using multiple linear regressions, we additionally explore the role of the source of information (i.e., whether information is given by parents or children). Based on cross-sectional data of a German sample of 2353 elementary school children from Grades 2 through 4, we found that parents’ information on the number of books and children’s books contributed to students’ academic language comprehension over and above parental occupation and education. Children’s information on the number of books did not further increase the amount of explained variance, and the effects were smaller than those for parents’ information. Yet, when investigated separately, both parents’ and children’s information on the number of books and children’s books at home predicted students’ academic language comprehension and mediated the relationship between more distal structural features of socioeconomic status (i.e., parents’ occupational status and education) and the outcome variable. No effect emerged for the number of ebooks. Our findings point to the robustness of the traditional books-at-home measure when used in parent questionnaires.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Achugar, M., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2005). Beyond connectors: The construction of cause in history textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 16(3), 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2006.02.003 Bailey, A. L. (Ed.). (2007). The language demands of school. Putting academic English to the test. Yale University Press. Baydar, N., & Akcinar, B. (2015). Ramifications of socioeconomic differences for three year old children and their families in Turkey. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 33(4), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.05.002 Berendes, K., Vajjala, S., Meurers, D., Bryant, D., Wagner, W., Chinkina, M., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Reading demands in secondary school: Does the linguistic complexity of textbooks increase with grade level and the academic orientation of the school track? Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(4), 518–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000225 Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. E. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory of research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenword Press. Bukodi, E., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). Decomposing ‘social origins’: The effects of parents’ class, status, and education on the educational attainment of their children. European Sociological Review, 29(5), 1023–1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcs079 Burgess, S. R., Hecht, S. A., & Lonigan, C. J. (2002). Relations of the home literacy environment (HLE) to the development of reading-related abilities: A one-year longitudinal study. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(4), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.37.4.4 Carbonaro, W. J. (1998). A little help from my friend’s parents: Intergenerational closure and educational outcomes. Sociology of Education, 71(4), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673172 Chatterjee, S., & Simonoff, J. S. (2013). Handbook of regression analysis. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-0931 Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6(4), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284 Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120. Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C.-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.6.4.330 Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175–199. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085551 Engzell, P. (2018). What do books in the home proxy for? A cautionary tale. Sociological Methods & Research, 50(4), 1487–1514. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119826143 Engzell, P., & Jonsson, J. O. (2015). Estimating social and ethnic inequality in school surveys: Biases from child misreporting and parent nonresponse. European Sociological Review, 31(3), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcv005 Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Explaining class inequality in education: The Swedish test case. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 1–64). Westview Press. Eriksson, K., Lindvall, J., Helenius, O., & Ryve, A. (2021). Socioeconomic status as a multidimensional predictor of student achievement in 77 societies. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.731634 Erola, J., Jalonen, S., & Lehti, H. (2016). Parental education, class and income over early life course and children’s achievement. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 44, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2016.01.003 Evans, M. D. R., Kelley, J., Sikora, J., & Treiman, D. J. (2010). Family scholarly culture and educational success: Books and schooling in 27 nations. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 28(2), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2010.01.002 Fitzgerald, J., Elmore, J., Relyea, J. E., & Stenner, A. J. (2020). Domain-specific academic vocabulary network development in elementary grades core disciplinary textbooks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 855–879. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000386 Fitzgerald, J., Relyea, J. E., & Elmore, J. (2022). Academic vocabulary volume in elementary grades disciplinary textbooks. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000735 Ganzeboom, H. B. G., de Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0049-089X(92)90017-B Grolig, L., Cohrdes, C., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Schroeder, S. (2019). Effects of preschoolers’ storybook exposure and literacy environments on lower level and higher level language skills. Reading and Writing, 32(4), 1061–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9901-2 Gustafsson, J. E., Hansen, K. Y., & Rosén, M. (2011). Effects of home background on student achievement in reading, mathematics, and science at the fourth grade. TIMSS and PIRLS Relationship Report, 4, 181–287. Hair, J. F. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall. Hällsten, M., & Thaning, M. (2021). Wealth as one of the “Big Four” SES dimensions in intergenerational transmissions. Social Forces, 100(4), 1533–1560. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/soab080 Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of economics of education (pp. 89–200). Elsevier. Harel, B. T., Cillessen, A. H. N., Fein, D. A., Bullard, S. E., & Aviv, A. (2007). It takes nine days to iron a shirt: The development of cognitive estimation skills in school age children. Child Neuropsychology, 13(4), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297040600837354 Harlaar, N., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2007). Reading exposure: A (largely) environmental risk factor with environmentally-mediated effects on reading performance in the primary school years. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(12), 1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01798.x Harwell, M., Maeda, Y., Bishop, K., & Xie, A. (2017). The surprisingly modest relationship between SES and Educational Achievement. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2015.1123668 Heppt, B., & Stanat, P. (2020). Development of academic language comprehension of German monolinguals and dual language learners. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101868 Heppt, B., Köhne-Fuetterer, J., Eglinsky, J., Volodina, A., Stanat, P., & Weinert, S. (2020). BiSpra 2–4. Test zur Erfassung bildungssprachlicher Kompetenzen bei Grundschulkindern der Jahrgangsstufen 2 bis 4 [BiSpra 2–4. Test for the assessment of academic language skills for elementary school children from grades 2 through 4]. Waxmann. Hovestadt, T., & Schneider, T. (2021). Liefern Jugendliche valide Informationen zum Bildungsstand ihrer Eltern in standardisierten Erhebungen? Befunde zu Schülerinnen und Schülern der 9. Jahrgangsstufe in Deutschland [Can adolescents provide valid information on parents’ educational attainment in standardized surveys? Results from a survey conducted in Grade 9 in Germany]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(3), 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-021-01016-5 International Labour Office. (2012). International standard classification of occupations: Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables, vol. 1. International Labour Organization. James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning with application in R. Springer. Jerrim, J., & Micklewright, J. (2014). Socio-economic gradients in children’s cognitive skills: Are cross-country comparisons robust to who reports family background? European Sociological Review, 30(6), 766–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu072 Johnston, R., Jones, K., & Manley, D. (2018). Confounding and collinearity in regression analysis: A cautionary tale and an alternative procedure, illustrated by studies of British voting behaviour. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1957–1976. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0584-6 Kinder-Medien-Studie. (2018). https://kinder-medien-studie.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/KMS2018_Berichtsband_v2.pdf. Klein, D. (2011). MIVIF: Stata module to calculate variance inflation factors after mi estimate regress. Statistical Software Components, S457254. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457254.html. Krcmar, M., & Cingel, D. P. (2014). Parent–child joint reading in traditional and electronic formats. Media Psychology, 17(3), 262–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2013.840243 Leszczensky, L., & Wolbring, T. (2022). How to deal with reverse causality using panel data? Recommendations for researchers based on a simulation study. Sociological Methods & Research, 51(2). 837–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124119882473 Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2013). TIMSS and PIRLS 2011: Relationships among reading, mathematics, and science achievement at the fourth grade—Implications for early learning. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. McElvany, N., Becker, M., & Lüdtke, O. (2009). Die Bedeutung familiärer Merkmale für Lesekompetenz, Wortschatz, Lesemotivation und Leseverhalten [The meaning of family characteristics for reading proficiency, vocabulary, reading motivation and reading behavior]. Zeitschrift Für Entwicklungspsychologie Und Pädagogische Psychologie, 41(3), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.41.3.121 McMullin, P., McGinnity, F., Murray, A., & Russell, H. (2020). What you do versus who you are: Home-learning activities, social origin and cognitive skills among young children in Ireland. European Sociological Review, 36(4), 610–625. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa012 Meneses, A., Uccelli, P., Santelices, M. V., Ruiz, M., Acevedo, D., & Figueroa, J. (2018). Academic language as a predictor of reading comprehension in monolingual Spanish-speaking readers: Evidence from Chilean early adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.192 Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890 Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012a). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Drucker, K. T. (2012b). PIRLS 2011 international results in reading. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2019). Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Muthén & Muthén. Myrberg, E., & Rosén, M. (2009). Direct and indirect effects of parents’ education on reading achievement among third graders in Sweden. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(4), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709909X453031 OECD. (1999). Classifying educational programmes: Manual for ISCED-97 implementation in OECD countries. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/1962350.pdf. OECD. (2009). Appendices. In OECD (Ed.), PISA 2006 Technical Report. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264048096-en. OECD. (2014). PISA 2012. Technical Report. OECD Publishing. OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume II): Where all students can succeed. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b5fd1b8f-en. Pagel, L. (2016). Die Bücherfrage als Indikator des kulturellen Kapitals in der Bildungsforschung. Lässt sich die Validität durch eine differenziertere Erfassung erhöhen? [The book question as an indicator of cultural capital in educational research. Can validity be increased by a more differentiated recording?] Unpublished master’s thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin. Park, H. (2008). Home literacy environments and children’s reading performance: A comparative study of 25 countries. Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(6), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610802576734 Richter, D., Böhme, K., Bastian-Wurzel, J., Pant, H. A., & Stanat, P. (2014). IQB-Ländervergleich 2011. Skalenhandbuch zur Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente [The IQB national assessment study 2011. Scale manual of the assessment instruments], vol. 6. Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, IQB. https://doi.org/10.18452/3127. Rideout, V. (2014). Learning at home: families’ educational media use in America. The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. Robitzsch, A., Kiefer, T., & Wu, M. (2021). TAM: Test Analysis Modules. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=TAM. Rodgers, D. (1974). Which connectives? Signals to enhance comprehension. Journal of Reading, 17(6), 462–466. Ross, K. M., Pye, R. E., & Randell, J. (2016). Reading touch screen storybooks with mothers negatively affects 7-year-old readers’ comprehension but enriches emotional engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01728 Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling. Lawrence Erlbaum. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610317 Schuth, E., Köhne, J., & Weinert, S. (2017). The influence of academic vocabulary knowledge on school performance. Learning and Instruction, 49, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.01.005 Schwippert, K. (2019). Was wird aus den Büchern? Sozialer Hintergrund von Lernenden und Bildungsungleichheit aus Sicht der international vergleichenden Erziehungswissenschaft [What’s about the books? Social background of students and educational opportunities from the perspective of international large-scale surveys]. Journal for Educational Research Online, 11(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:16789 Sieben, S., & Lechner, C. M. (2019). Measuring cultural capital through the number of books in the household. Measurement Instruments for the Social Sciences, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42409-018-0006-0 Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417 Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597 Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In E. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 290–312). American Sociological Association. https://doi.org/10.2307/270723. Statista. (2021). Statista-Dossier zum E-Book-Markt in Deutschland [Statista dossier on the ebook market in Germany]. https://de.statista.com/statistik/studie/id/6689/dokument/e-books-statista-dossier/ Uccelli, P., Demir-Lira, O. E., Rowe, M. L., Levine, S., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2019). Children’s early decontextualized talk predicts academic language proficiency in midadolescence. Child Development, 90(5), 1650–1663. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13034 van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v045.i03 Volodina, A., Weinert, S., & Mursin, K. (2020). Development of academic vocabulary across primary school age: Differential growth and influential factors for German monolinguals and language minority learners. Developmental Psychology, 56(5), 922–936. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000910 Volodina, A., Heppt, B., & Weinert, S. (2021a). Effects of socioeconomic status and language use on academic language proficiency in children with a migration background: An evaluation using quantile regressions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 101973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101973 Volodina, A., Heppt, B., & Weinert, S. (2021b). Relations between the comprehension of connectives and school performance in primary school. Learning and Instruction, 74, 101430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101430 Warm, T. (1989). Weighted likelihood estimation of ability in item response theory. Psychometrika, 54(3), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294627 Weinert, S., Stanat, P., Heppt, B., Volodina, A., & Eglinsky, J. (2020). BiSpra-Aufgaben: Weiterentwicklung zu einem diagnostisch nutzbaren Testinstrument und Prüfung der Sensitivität für Fördereffekte (Verbundprojekt). Schlussbericht 2019. [BiSpra-Transfer: Development and validation of a standardized test instrument (joint project). Final report 2019]. University of Bamberg. https://doi.org/10.18452/22352.