Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps

Journal of Cell Biology - Tập 176 Số 2 - Trang 231-241 - 2007
Tobias A. Fuchs1,2, Ulrike Abu Abed1,3, Christian Goosmann1,3, Robert Hurwitz4, Ilka Schulze5, V. Wahn5, Yvette Weinrauch2, Volker Brinkmann3, Arturo Zychlinsky1
11Department for Cellular Microbiology
25Department of Microbiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016
32Microscopy Core Facility,
43Protein Purification Core Facility, Max-Planck Institute for Infection Biology, 10117 Berlin, Germany
54Department for Paediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 13353 Berlin, Germany

Tóm tắt

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are extracellular structures composed of chromatin and granule proteins that bind and kill microorganisms. We show that upon stimulation, the nuclei of neutrophils lose their shape, and the eu- and heterochromatin homogenize. Later, the nuclear envelope and the granule membranes disintegrate, allowing the mixing of NET components. Finally, the NETs are released as the cell membrane breaks. This cell death process is distinct from apoptosis and necrosis and depends on the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by NADPH oxidase. Patients with chronic granulomatous disease carry mutations in NADPH oxidase and cannot activate this cell-death pathway or make NETs. This novel ROS-dependent death allows neutrophils to fulfill their antimicrobial function, even beyond their lifespan.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

2002, J. Immunol., 169, 898, 10.4049/jimmunol.169.2.898

2006, Curr. Biol., 16, 401, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.01.056

1997, Blood., 89, 3503, 10.1182/blood.V89.10.3503

2004, Science., 303, 1532, 10.1126/science.1092385

2006, Curr. Biol., 16, 396, 10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.039

1998, Blood., 92, 4808, 10.1182/blood.V92.12.4808

2004, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 2, 820, 10.1038/nrmicro1004

2005, J. Clin. Invest., 115, 3117, 10.1172/JCI22684

2005, Hum. Immunol., 66, 1146, 10.1016/j.humimm.2005.11.003

1998, Blood., 92, 3007, 10.1182/blood.V92.9.3007

2002, J. Leukoc. Biol., 71, 775, 10.1189/jlb.71.5.775

2003, Curr. Opin. Immunol., 15, 578, 10.1016/S0952-7915(03)00109-2

1895, J Physiol., 17, 80.1

1999

1996, J. Immunol. Methods., 192, 173, 10.1016/0022-1759(96)00049-X

1992, J. Immunol., 148, 1561, 10.4049/jimmunol.148.5.1561

1999, J. Leukoc. Biol., 65, 196, 10.1002/jlb.65.2.196

1975, J. Clin. Invest., 55, 561, 10.1172/JCI107963

2006, Nat. Rev. Microbiol., 4, 242, 10.1038/nrmicro1399

2006, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 6, 173, 10.1038/nri1785

2000, Cell Biochem. Funct., 18, 127, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0844(200006)18:2<127::AID-CBF865>3.0.CO;2-V

2002, Nature., 416, 291, 10.1038/416291a

2002, Nat. Immunol., 3, 1129, 10.1038/ni1202-1129

2005, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 17, 183, 10.1016/j.ceb.2005.02.004

2005, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 23, 197, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115653

1995, J. Leukoc. Biol., 57, 2, 10.1002/jlb.57.1.2

1996, J. Leukoc. Biol., 59, 229, 10.1002/jlb.59.2.229

2005, Cell., 121, 667, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.016

2005, Nat. Genet., 37, 1130, 10.1038/ng1639

1980, J. Cell. Physiol., 105, 327, 10.1002/jcp.1041050215

1980, Inflammation., 4, 371, 10.1007/BF00916048

2006, Cell. Microbiol., 8, 668, 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00659.x

2002, Nature., 417, 91, 10.1038/417091a

1988, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 85, 8531, 10.1073/pnas.85.22.8531

1994, Physiol. Rev., 74, 139, 10.1152/physrev.1994.74.1.139