Non-stationarity of tree branching patterns and bifurcation ratios

The Royal Society - Tập 228 Số 1251 - Trang 187-194 - 1986
David A. Steingraeber1, D. M. Waller2
1Department of Botany, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U. S. A.
2Department of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, U.S.A.

Tóm tắt

Branching patterns in organisms have been analysed by using branch ordering and bifurcation ratio techniques originally developed by geomorphologists to study stream drainage patterns. An underlying assump­tion of these methods is that branching patterns are stationary across boundaries of scale so that a subsample will accurately model a larger structure. This assumption of stationarity is not generally valid for tree branching patterns. Data from four species reveal two specific patterns of non-stationarity that are directly related to morphological patterns of shoot development. Average bifurcation ratios appear to be inappropriate descriptions of tree branching patterns, since they are based solely on relative branch position and ignore biologically important details of form and development. ‘Certain assumptions are liable, through long usage, to become part of the recognized currency of thought, although most of those who employ them have never made any effort to test their validity.’ Agnes Arber, 1933

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1111/j.1469-8137.1933.tb07008.x

10.1016/0378-1127(82)90035-4

10.1086/337238

Cheetham A. H., 1980, Branching structure in aborescent animals: models of relative growth. J. theor, Biol., 85, 335

Eyles R. J., 1968, Stream net ratios in west, Soc., 79, 701

Halle F. Oldeman R. A. A. & Tomlinson P. B. 1978 Tropical trees and forests. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

10.1111/j.1469-8137.1969.tb06453.x

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1981.tb07801.x

Horsfield K., 1980, Are diameter, length and branching ratios meaningful in the Iung ? J. theor, Biol., 87, 773

Horton R. E., 1945, Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrological approach to quantitative morphology. Bull. geol, Soc. Am., 56, 275

Leopold L. B., 1971, Trees and streams: the efficiency of branching patterns. J. theor, Biol., 31, 339

10.1038/scientificamerican0775-92

McMahon T. A., 1976, Tree structures: deducing the principle of mechanical design. J. theor, Biol., 59, 443

10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a085449

Oohata S., 1971, Studies on the branching structure of trees. I. Bifurcation ratio of trees in Horton's law, Jap. J. Ecol., 21, 7

10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb03191.x

Ranalli G., 1968, A test of the topological structure of river nets, Hydrol., 13, 142

Robinson G., 1967, The geomorphic irrelevance of some drainage net laws: comment. Aust. geogr, Stud., 5, 81

10.1029/WR002i002p00199

10.1086/627137

Schumm S. A., 1956, The evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New, Soc. Am., 67, 597

10.1029/WR003i003p00773

Smith K. G., 1958, Erosional processes and land forms in Badlands National Monument, South, Soc. Am., 69, 975

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1982.tb13301.x

10.1002/j.1537-2197.1979.tb06243.x

Strahler A. N., 1957, Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology, Un., 38, 913

10.1080/0028825X.1978.10425142

T ukey J . W. 1977 Some th o u g h ts on clinical trials especially problem s of m ultiplicity Science Wash. 198 679-684.

W aller D. M. & Steingraeber D. A. 1985 B ranching and m odular grow th: theoretical models and em pirical p attern s. In Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms (ed. J . B. C. Jackson L. W. Buss & R. E. Cook) pp. 225-257. New H aven: Yale U niversity Press.

1984, The arch itectu re of devil's w alking stick, Aralia spinosa (Araliaceae), J. Arnold Arbor., 65, 403, 10.5962/p.185923

10.2307/2484833