Nocturnal Relative Humidity Maxima above the Boundary Layer in the U.S. Midwest: A Diagnostic for the Mountain–Plains Solenoidal Circulation

Monthly Weather Review - Tập 146 Số 2 - Trang 641-658 - 2018
Amanda Mercer1, Rachel Y.‐W. Chang1, Ian Folkins1
1Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Tóm tắt

Measurements from the Aircraft Communications, Addressing, and Reporting System (ACARS) dataset between 2005 and 2014 are used to construct diurnal vertical cross sections of relative humidity in the lower troposphere at six airports in the U.S. Midwest. In summer, relative humidity maxima occur between 2 and 3 km during the overnight hours of 0300–0900 local solar time (LST). These maxima coincide with negative anomalies in temperature and positive anomalies in specific humidity. Vertical winds from the Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for Research and Applications, version 2 (MERRA-2), reanalysis dataset show that the height and diurnal timing of these positive relative humidity anomalies are consistent with the regional diurnal pattern of vertical motion. During the day, there is rising motion over the Rocky Mountains and subsidence over the Midwest, while conversely at night, there is sinking motion over the mountains and rising motion over the Midwest. The nocturnal relative humidity maxima over the Midwest are the strongest direct observational evidence to date of this mountain–plains solenoidal circulation, and provide a useful diagnostic for testing the strength of this circulation in climate and reanalysis models. There is significant interannual variability in the strength of the nocturnal relative humidity maxima. In 2011, the relative humidity maxima are very pronounced. In 2014, however, they are almost nonexistent. Finally, the relative humidity maxima are discussed in relation to the low-level jet (LLJ). The LLJ appears to be too low to directly contribute to the nocturnal relative humidity maxima.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.5194/acp-13-6965-2013

10.1175/1520-0434(1999)014<1032:AOAWAT>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00719.1

10.1175/1520-0477-38.5.283

10.1175/1520-0450(1989)028<0590:AORSFI>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/2008JCLI2275.1

10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0758.1

GMAO, 2015: MERRA-2 inst3_3d_asm_Np: 3d, 3-hourly, instantaneous, pressure-level assimilation, assimilated meteorological fields, version 5.12.4. Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (GES DISC), accessed 4 April 2017, doi:10.5067/QBZ6MG944HW0.

10.1175/1520-0442(1997)010<0481:IOTGPL>2.0.CO;2

Holton, J., 2004: An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology. Academic Press, 535 pp.

10.1175/JHM560.1

10.1175/2010JAS3423.1

Mamrosh, R., R. Baker, and T. Jirikowic, 2002: A comparison of ACARS WVSS and NWS radiosonde temperature and moisture data. Sixth Symp. on Integrated Observing Systems, Orlando, FL, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 6.1.4, https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/30088.pdf.

10.1175/BAMS-84-2-203

10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.09.019

10.1175/1520-0450(1962)001<0043:TLLJAR>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0350.1

10.1175/JAMC-D-14-0114.1

10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010<0528:ACOTAW>2.0.CO;2

Smith, A., N. Lott, T. Houston, K. Shein, J. Crouch, and J. Enloe, 2017: U.S. billion-dollar weather and climate disasters 1980–2017. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (NCEI), 13 pp. https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/billions/events.pdf.

Stull, R. B., 1988: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology. Kluwer Academic, 666 pp.

10.1002/2016JD025229

10.1175/MWR-D-11-00041.1

10.1175/2009JAS3247.1

10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0273:NSOAOO>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/JAS-D-12-0181.1

10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1363:LLJCFE>2.0.CO;2

10.1175/1520-0493(1994)122<1490:TMPCEO>2.0.CO;2

10.5194/acp-14-10741-2014