New method of cardiac output measurement using ultrasound velocity dilution in rats

Journal of Applied Physiology - Tập 91 Số 3 - Trang 1274-1282 - 2001
Nary Veal1, Frédéric Moal1, Jinhua Wang1, E. Vuillemin1, Frédéric Oberti1, Emmanuel Roy2, Mehdi Kaassis1, Renaud Trouvé2, Jean‐Louis Saumet2, Paul Calès1
1Laboratoire HIFIH and
2Laboratoire de Physiologie, UPRES EA-2170, Université d'Angers, 49033 Angers, France

Tóm tắt

The aim of this study was to validate a new technique for the measurement of cardiac output (CO) based on ultrasound and dilution (COUD) in anesthetized rats. A transit time ultrasound (TTU) probe was placed around the rat carotid artery, and ultrasound velocity dilution curves were generated on intravenous injections of saline. CO by COUD were calculated from the dilution curves for normal and portal hypertensive rats in which CO was known to be increased. COUD was compared with the radiolabeled microsphere method and with direct aortic TTU flowmetry for baseline CO and drug-induced CO variations. CO in direct aortic TTU flowmetry was the ascending aorta blood flow measured directly by TTU probe (normal use of TTU flowmetry). The reproducibility of COUD within the same animal was also determined under baseline conditions. COUD detected the known CO increase in portal hypertensive rats compared with normal rats. CO values by COUD were correlated with those provided by microsphere technique or direct aortic TTU flowmetry (adjusted r = 0.76, P < 10−4 and r = 0.79, P < 0.05, respectively). Baseline CO values and terlipressin-induced CO variations were detected by COUD and the other techniques. Intra- and interobserver agreements for COUD were excellent (intraclass r = 0.99 and 0.98, respectively). COUD was reproducible at least 10 times in 20 min. COUD is an accurate and reproducible method providing low-cost, repetitive CO measurements without open-chest surgery. It can be used in rats as an alternative to the microsphere method and to direct aortic flowmetry.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1590/S0100-879X1997000700013

Barnes RJ, 1983, J Physiol (Lond), 345, 2

10.1152/jappl.1971.31.4.598

Burton RG, 1984, Med Electronics, 15, 68

10.1016/S0168-8278(85)80772-8

10.1002/hep.510280515

10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.6.H2701

10.1152/ajpheart.1995.268.3.H1368

10.1121/1.1913202

10.1152/physrev.1956.36.1.77

10.1007/BF02584272

10.1097/00002480-199809000-00028

10.1053/gast.1996.v110.pm8613060

Gil-Rodriguez JA, 1970, Br J Anaesth, 42, 981

10.1056/NEJM199606203342507

10.1152/ajpgi.1993.265.3.G587

10.1152/ajpheart.1984.246.6.H754

10.1152/ajpheart.1980.239.4.H443

10.1152/ajpheart.1993.265.3.H1007

Krivitski NM., 1994, ASAIO J, 40, 82

10.1097/00002480-199507000-00111

10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80282-6

10.1016/S0168-8278(05)80529-X

10.1111/j.1475-097X.1993.tb00470.x

10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00238.x

10.1097/00002480-199609000-00124

Oberti F, 1998, Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 22, 697

Rader RD., 1976, Med Instrum, 10, 185

10.1111/j.1525-1594.1997.tb03748.x

10.1121/1.398466

10.1113/jphysiol.1897.sp000684

10.1152/ajpheart.1978.235.3.H357

10.1152/ajpheart.1986.250.1.H137

10.1152/ajpgi.1983.244.1.G52

10.1152/jappl.1976.40.5.849

10.1536/ihj.25.1051

Welch WJ, 1993, J Am Soc Nephrol, 3, 528

10.1152/ajprenal.1995.268.1.F175

10.1097/00005344-199604000-00005