New insights into the process of peer review for EFL writing: A process-oriented socio-cultural perspective

Learning and Instruction - Tập 58 - Trang 263-273 - 2018
Huahui Zhao1
1School of Education, Hillary Place, University of Leeds, LEEDS, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aljaafreh, 1994, Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development, The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.x Berry, 2011, Assessment trends in Hong Kong: Seeking to establish formative assessment in an examination culture, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18, 199 Chang, 2016, Two decades of research in L2 peer review, Journal of Writing Research, 8, 81, 10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.03 Cheng, 2000, Asian students' reticence revisited, System, 28, 435, 10.1016/S0346-251X(00)00015-4 Cho, 2010, Student revision with peer and expert reviewing, Learning and Instruction, 20, 328, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 DE Guerrero, 2000, Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision, The Modern Language Journal, 84, 51, 10.1111/0026-7902.00052 Ellis, 2010, A framework for investigating oral and written corrective feedback, Stud. Sec. Lang. Acquis., 32, 335, 10.1017/S0272263109990544 Foster, 2005, Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms, Applied Linguistics, 26, 402, 10.1093/applin/ami014 Gielen, 2010, Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning, Learning and Instruction, 20, 304, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 Hu, 2010, Issues of cultural appropriateness and pedagogical efficacy: Exploring peer review in a second language writing class, Instructional Science, 38, 371, 10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1 Lantolf, 2000 Lantolf, 2003 Lantolf, 1995, Second language learning in the zone of proximal development: A revolutionary experience, International Journal of Educational Research, 23, 619, 10.1016/0883-0355(96)80441-1 Lee, 2007, Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning?, Assessing Writing, 12, 180, 10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003 Lee, 2015, Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students' perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback, System, 55, 1, 10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003 Lei, 2017, Salience of student written feedback by peer-revision in EFL writing class, English Language Teaching, 10, 10.5539/elt.v10n12p151 Lockhart, 1995, Analysing talk in ESL peer response groups: Stances, functions and content, Language Learning, 45, 605, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00456.x Lundstrom, 2009, To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing, Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30, 10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002 Nelson, 1998, ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups, Journal of Second Language Writing, 7, 113, 10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90010-8 Nelson, 2009, The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance, Instructional Science, 37, 375, 10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x Rahimi, 2013, Is training student reviewers worth its while? A study of how training influences the quality of students' feedback and writing, Language Teaching Research, 17, 67, 10.1177/1362168812459151 Ruegg, 2015, The relative effects of peer and teacher feedback on improvement in EFL students' writing ability, Linguistics and Education, 29, 73, 10.1016/j.linged.2014.12.001 Storch, 2002, Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work, Language Learning, 52, 119, 10.1111/1467-9922.00179 Swain, 2000, The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue Swain, 2002, Peer-peer dialogue as a means of second language learning, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 171, 10.1017/S0267190502000090 Villamil, 1996, Peer revision in the L2 classroom: Social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behaviour, Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51, 10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90015-6 Villamil, 1998, Assessing the impact of peer revision on L2 writing, Applied Linguistics, 19, 491, 10.1093/applin/19.4.491 Villamil, 2006, Socio-cultural theory: A framework for understanding the socio-cognitive dimensions of peer feedback Vygotsky, 1978 Weissberg, 2006, Scaffolded feedback: Tutorial conversations with advanced L2 writers Wigglesworth, 2012, What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback, Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 364, 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.005 Wood, 1976, The role of tutoring in problem solving, Ournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x Yang, 2006, A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class, Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179, 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 Yang, 2013, The effects of online feedback on students' text revision, Language, Learning and Technology, 17, 220 Yu, 2014, An analysis of Chinese EFL students' use of first and second language in peer feedback of L2 writing, System, 47, 28, 10.1016/j.system.2014.08.007 Yu, 2015, Understanding EFL students' participation in group peer feedback of L2 writing: A case study from an activity theory perspective, Language Teaching Research, 19, 572, 10.1177/1362168814541714 Yu, 2016, Exploring Chinese students' strategy use in a cooperative peer feedback writing group, System, 58, 1, 10.1016/j.system.2016.02.005 Zhang, 1999, Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback, Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 321, 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80119-2 Zhao, 2010, Investigating learners' use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom, Assessing Writing, 15, 3, 10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002 Zhao, 2014, Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing, ELT Journal, 68, 105, 10.1093/elt/cct068 Zhao, 2018, Exploring tertiary English as a Foreign Language writing tutors' perceptions of the appropriateness of peer assessment for writing, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1 Zhu, 2012, Participation in peer response as activity: An examination of peer response stances from an activity theory perspective, Tesol Quarterly, 46, 362, 10.1002/tesq.22 van Zundert, 2010, Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions, Learning and Instruction, 20, 270, 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004