New Empirical Generalizations on the Determinants of Price Elasticity

Journal of Marketing Research - Tập 42 Số 2 - Trang 141-156 - 2005
Tammo H.A. Bijmolt1, Harald J. van Heerde2, Rik Pieters2
1University of Groningen, The Netherlands
2Tilburg University, the Netherlands

Tóm tắt

The importance of pricing decisions for firms has fueled an extensive stream of research on price elasticities. In an influential meta-analytical study, Tellis (1988) summarized price elasticity research findings until 1986. However, empirical generalizations on price elasticity require modifications because of (1) changes in market characteristics (i.e., characteristics of brands, product categories, and economic conditions) and (2) changes in the research methodology used to assess price elasticities. Therefore, the authors present a meta-analysis of price elasticity with new empirical generalizations on its determinants. Across a set of 1851 price elasticities based on 81 studies, the average price elasticity is −2.62. A salient finding is that over the past four decades, sales elasticities have significantly increased in magnitude, whereas share and choice elasticities have remained fairly constant. The authors find that accommodating price endogeneity has a strong (magnitude-increasing) impact on price elasticities. A striking null result is that accounting for heterogeneity does not affect elasticities significantly. The authors also present an analysis that explains the difference between their findings and Tellis's findings, and they indicate which new price elasticity studies are most desirable.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1016/S0167-8116(99)00010-5

10.1509/jmkg.65.1.44.18130

10.1287/mksc.18.4.504

10.1287/mnsc.44.11.1533

10.1023/A:1011117103381

Bloom Derek, 1980, Journal of the Market Research Society, 22, 221

10.1287/mksc.8.2.153

Bolton Ruth N., 1989, Journal of Retailing, 65, 193

10.1177/002224379403100202

10.1287/mksc.18.3.247

10.1257/000282803321455142

10.1287/mksc.20.4.442.9751

10.1177/002224379703400302

10.1362/026725700784683726

10.1177/002224379202900112

10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00064-5

10.1016/S0167-8116(01)00044-1

10.1177/002224379803500408

Ghosh Avijit, 1983, 1983 AMA Educators' Conference Proceedings, 226

10.1016/0167-8116(93)90001-F

10.1287/mksc.12.3.213

Greene William H., 2000, Econometric Analysis, 4

Grewal Dhruv, 1996, Pricing Strategy & Practice, 4, 4

10.1177/002224379603300401

10.1177/002224378802500402

Hanssens Dominique M., 2001, Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis, 2

10.4324/9781410604118

10.1086/317588

Jain Dipak C., 1994, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12, 317

10.1287/mksc.18.1.1

10.1287/mksc.14.3.G151

10.1007/BF00994104

10.1007/978-1-4615-4050-2

10.1046/j.0039-0402.2003.00252.x

Mason J. Barry, 1980, Journal of Retailing, 56, 56

10.1177/002224379703400205

10.1177/002224379803500210

Monroe Kent B., 2003, Pricing: Making Profitable Decisions, 3

10.1016/S0022-4359(99)80103-1

10.1177/002224299606000202

10.4135/9781848608283.n14

10.1023/A:1007962520455

10.1509/jmkr.39.4.421.19114

10.1287/mksc.18.1.23

10.1016/0167-4870(85)90026-1

10.1177/002224377901600401

10.1016/S0167-8116(00)00023-9

10.1177/002224378802500401

Van Heerde Harald J., 2005, Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 21

10.1509/jmkr.40.4.481.19386

10.1509/jmkr.37.3.383.18782

10.1287/mksc.1040.0061

10.1287/mnsc.45.10.1324

10.1016/0148-2963(95)00149-2

Wittink Dick R., 1988, “The Estimation, Validation, and Use of Promotional Effects Based on Scanner Data,”