Neuropsychological Prediction of Decline to Dementia in Nondemented Elderly

Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology - Tập 12 Số 4 - Trang 168-179 - 1999
Alan Kluger1, Mary Sano, James Golomb, Mary Mittelman, ‌Barry Reisberg
1Department of Psychiatry, William and Sylvia Silberstein Aging and Dementia Research Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York 10016, USA.

Tóm tắt

This study examined whether baseline neuropsychological performance in elderly assessed at a research clinic could accurately predict subsequent decline to dementia. Logistic regression analyses were applied to (1) 213 nondemented elderly with a Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) score of 1, 2, or 3, of whom 74 (35%) subsequently declined to any diagnosis of dementia, and (2) a diagnostically more restricted subset of this sample (N = 179), of whom 56 (31%) declined to a diagnosis of probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). The mean follow-up intervals were 3.8 and 3.7 years, respectively. A small set of baseline neuropsychological measures (especially a Paragraph Delayed Recall Test) significantly differentiated decliners from nondecliners to dementia or AD, after accounting for the contribution of age, sex, education, follow-up interval, and the rating of global clinical status. When examined in combination with the other factors or alone, the cognitive tests produced reasonably high specificities (91%-97%) and sensitivities (73%-89%). Using the obtained regression model, a similar level of classification accuracy was replicated on an independent sample of 119 nondemented elderly. A subanalysis of the high-risk GDS 3 subgroup indicated that cut scores from the paragraph test distinguished nondecliners from decliners (overall accuracies 87%-91%), implying that this assessment may accurately predict future cognitive status in elderly with mild cognitive impairment. (J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 1999; 12:168-179).

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1002/ddr.430150203

10.1212/WNL.39.9.1159

10.1001/archneur.1984.04050170043013

10.1001/jama.1985.03350290076029

10.1212/WNL.38.6.900

10.1001/archneur.1989.00520380041011

10.1002/gps.930060409

10.1001/archneur.1991.00530150046016

10.1001/archneur.1994.00540210088017

10.1212/WNL.44.5.867

10.1093/geronb/52B.1.P28

10.1080/13825589608256620

10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136

10.1192/bjp.140.6.566

10.1212/WNL.41.7.1006

10.1001/archneur.1989.00520400037017

10.1001/archneur.1989.00520400033016

10.1212/WNL.41.4.469

10.1093/arclin/4.4.323

10.1093/arclin/6.1-2.49

10.1016/0278-5846(86)90026-6

10.1177/089198879300600205

10.1016/0197-4580(94)92568-2

Dal Forno G., 1995, Neurology, 45, A171

10.1212/WNL.46.3.661

10.1111/j.1532-5415.1997.tb00947.x

10.1212/WNL.44.8.1427

10.1080/87565648609540348

10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb05565.x

10.1001/jama.1989.03430180093036

10.1212/WNL.43.1_Part_1.13

Mortimer JA, 1993, Neurology, 43, S39

10.1001/jama.1994.03510370056032

American Psychiatric, 1994, Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4

10.1212/WNL.34.7.939

10.2466/pms.1968.27.1.277

10.2466/pr0.1980.47.3f.1315

Wechsler D., 1955, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale

Ferris SH, Crook T., Flicker C. Assessing cognitive impairment and evaluating treatment effects: psychometric performance tests. In: Poon LW, ed. The handbook for clinical memory assessment of older adults. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association , 1986:108-128.

10.1007/978-1-4615-6805-6_20

10.1017/S1041610296002657

Folstein MF, 1975, J Psychiatr Res, 12, 189, 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

10.1001/archneur.1993.00540090066012

Golomb J., 1994, Learning and Memory, 1, 45, 10.1101/lm.1.1.45

10.1212/WNL.47.3.810

de Leon MJ, 1993, Am J Neuroradiol, 14, 897

10.1126/science.1896849